The Lawyer-Client Relationship Flashcards
What is considered competent representation?
Possessing the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
Rule 1.1
Who has the ultimate authority to determine the purposes of litigation?
The client. Rule 1.2(a).
Who decides the objectives of representation and what do these include?
The client. Includes whether or not to settle (civil cases) and whether to plead, waive jury trial, or testify (criminal trial).
Rule 1.2(a)
When can a lawyer limit the scope of representation?
If the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives** informed consent.**
Rule 1.2(c)
Who has the right to determine the technical, legal, & tactical means to pursue the objective?
The attorney, but must consult with the client and if there is a disagreement, seek a mutually acceptable solution.
Rule 1.2, comment 2
Who has the right to decide** expenses **and dealings with third persons who might be adversely affected? (ex. witnesses)
The client. Rule 1.2, comment 2.
If the client has a** fundamental disagreement** with the lawyer’s objectives and vice versa, what actions can either take?
The client may discharge the lawyer and vice versa. See Rules 1.16(b)(4) and 1.16(a)(3) for more.
Can the scope of representation be limited?
Yes, by either party as long as the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances. Limitation does not exempt a lawyer from the duty to provide competent representation, but is a factor to be considered when determining the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
Rule 1.2, comment 7
If a client proposes a criminal or fraudulent course of conduct, what is the lawyer allowed to do under the Rules
A lawyer cannot counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.
But, a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel client as to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law.
Rule 1.2(d)
What must a lawyer do if they become aware that their client is acting criminally or fraudulently?
The lawyer must stop assisting the client and withdraw from the representation.
Rule 1.2, comment 10
⚠️ In some cases, withdrawal alone might be insufficient. It may be necessary for the lawyer to give notice of the fact of withdrawal and to disaffirm any opinion, document, or affirmation. See Rule 4.1.
Can a lawyer disclose a client’s wrongdoing?
No, unless allowed by Rule 1.6.
True or false: When a client is of diminished capacity, the lawyer does not need to maintain a normal lawyer-client relationship.
False. The lawyer must, as far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.
Rule 1.14(a)
For example, the client may wish to have family members participate in discussions with the lawyer. The lawyer must keep the client’s interest foremost and look to the client, and not family members, to make decisions on the client’s behalf. Rule 1.14, comment 3.
What actions can a lawyer take if she reasonably believes that the client has diminished capacity, is at risk of substantial physical, financial or other harm unless action is taken and cannot adequately act in the client’s own interest?
Take reasonably necessary protective action, including:
- Consulting with family members or other individuals/entities that have the ability to take action to protect the client;
- Seeking the appointment of a guardian; and
- Using a reconsideration period to permit clarification or improvement of circumstances
Rule 1.14(b)
When taking protective action for a client with diminished capacity, can a lawyer reveal protected information about the client?
Yes, the lawyer is impliedly authorized under Rule 1.6(a) to reveal information about the client, but only to the extent** reasonably necessary** to protect the client’s interests.
The lawyer should determine whether it is likely that the person consulted will act adversely to the client’s interests before discussing matters related to the client.
Rule 1.14(c)
A lawyer cannot charge unreasonable fees. What factors determine whether a fee is reasonable?
The factors determining whether a fee is reasonable are:
- The** time and labor** required, the **novelty and difficulty **of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly;
- The likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer;
- The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;
- The amount involved and the results obtained;
- The time limitations;
- The nature and length of the professional relationship with the client;
- The experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and
- Whether the fee is fixed or contingent
Rule 1.5(a)