The Judiciary Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define the judiciary

A

-Group of judges
-Work on diff levels, functions similar to but power different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legislation for judges

A

-Courts and legal services act 1990 laid down criteria for appointment of each level of judge
Amended by constitutional reform act 005 and Tribunal courts and enforcement act 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two different types of judges?

A

-Inferior and superior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the types of inferior judges?

A

-District
-Recorder
-Circuit
-tribunal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Superior judges

A

-High court judge
-Lord/lady justices of appeal
-justices of the Supreme Court
-Head of judiciary is the lord chief justice
-those who have more power and can make decisions on appeals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where do the inferior judges sit?

A

-Circuit: cc and county
-Recorders: part time, cc and county
-District: small claims in county, also magistrates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Justice of Supreme court (how to become)

A

-judge in coa or qualified to appear in senior courts for 15 yrs
-constitutional reform act 2005, max of 12 justices
-hear final appeals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Selection of justices of the Supreme Court

A

-up to 2005 lord chancellor selected. Lord chancellor political appointment - not independent
-changed by constitutional reforms act
-judicial appointments commission
-select 500 a year
-can’t be appointed unless recommended by commission
-must consult w lord chief justice and another judge before recommending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Role of justices of sc

A

-hear 100 appeal cases a year
-civil or criminal
-maj civil appeal
-complicated areas of law
-min 3 on panel
-brexit case 2016 11 judges
-any decision become precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lord justice of appeal (how to become)

A

-qualified as barrister or solicitor, experience for 7 yrs or be HC judge
-appointed by queen
-sit in civil coa and hear appeals from county or high court
-sit in crim coa hear appeals from crown court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

High court judges (how to become)

A

-qual as barrister or solicitor for 7 years or circuit for 2 years
-appointed by queen
-assigned to one of divisions of high court and hear claims
-deputy HC judges also appointed like this
-majority in practice for 20 or 30 yrs
-expected to have prev judicial experience
-sit alongside lord justices in coa to hear appeals relating to their divisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Circuit judge (how to become)

A

-solicitor or barrister, right of audience for 10 years
-served part time as recorder in criminal cases or full time as district in civil before appointed
-hear crim and civil cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Recorder

A

-part time for qualified barristers or solicitors who have 7 yrs experience
-recorder in training then recorder
-less serious civil cases and criminal cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

District judge (how to become)

A

-full time
-qual as barrister or solicitor for 5 yrs or been deputy district judge
-majority are former solicitors
-Tribunals courts and enforcement act 2007 allow culex to be deputy district judge
-civil and criminal cases, county and mag court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Role of inferior judges in civil court

A

-county and HC sit on own to deal with aspects of case
-deal with pretrial matters (management and timetable)
-trial, hear evidence, listen to legal arguments, look at case papers, decide facts and how law applies, make decision who has won.
-in contract and tort, decide damages payable or other remedy
-decide who should pay legal costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Role of superior judges in civil cases

A

-appeal court judges and sc hear argument on legal points in case, decide if decision should stand or appeal be allowed
-against liability or remedy
-only to SC if important point of law or issue of general public importance

17
Q

Role of inferior judges in criminal cases

A

-mag court district sits on own to decide if dft guilty or not, sentence.
-CC: judge sits w jury when dft pleads NG to TEW or indictable. Decide legal issues, sentence when found or pleaded guilty, take legal submissions into account

18
Q

Role of superior judges in criminal court

A

-Appeal to COA against sentence and conviction. 3 judges hear legal arguments, confirm or vary decision or sentence
-further appeal to sc, only if leave to appeal granted. 5 will hear legal arguments, no evidence. Either agree or overrule coa.

19
Q

How is separation of powers maintained?

A

3 arms of state by Montesquieu
1. Legislature: parliament. Law making
2. Executive: government. Body administering law. Puts forward ideas on how to run country, P votes so can’t overstep
3. Judiciary: judges, decide cases and apply relevant laws

20
Q

Where is there overlap?

A

-Between the legislature and executive as ministers in government also sit in parliament and active in law making
-Lord chancellor involved in all three but role in relation to judiciary reduced. Little overlap w judiciary and others, important as executive don’t overstep

21
Q

How does security of tenure support independence of the judiciary?

A

-superior judges can’t be dismissed by gov, only monarch after petition from both houses. Protection from politics and can be independent in judgement without fear of being dismissed
-inferior don’t have same. Lord chancellor w consent of lord chief justice has power to dismiss them for incapacity or misbehaviour

22
Q

Act which supports judicial independence

A

-s3 Constitutional reform act 2005
-Lord chancellor and others in gov must uphold continued independence of judiciary
-Lord chancellor and gov minsters not to influence particular decisions

23
Q

How does immunity from suit support independence of the judiciary

A

Judges given immunity from prosecution for any judicial acts.
-can perform duties without fear of repercussions
-can’t be sued in civil cases
-includes defamation claim for anything said abt parties or witnesses

24
Q

Case for immunity from suit

A

-Sirros v Moore
-Wrongly ordered detention. Claimed false imprisonment against judge. COA decided detention unlawful but no action against judge as acted in good faith

25
Q

Independence from legislature

A

Judges not involved in law making
Full time judges can be MP’s
Recorders can be MP’s
Creation SC in 2009 to separate judiciary from legislature, used to be judges in HL when HL was final court
Salaries from consolidated fund, no authority by P
But p can change retirement ages and qualifying periods for pensions

26
Q

Independence from the executive

A

Gov can’t dismiss sup judges
Don’t have to agree w gov
Judicial appointment commission appoint

S3 Constitutional reform act 2005 - Lord chancellor and other members relating to jud must uphold independence
Lord chancellor must not seek to influence

27
Q

Independence from case

A

-Judges mustn’t hear cases if they have any interest

28
Q

Case for independence from case

A

-R v Pinochet: HL judges heard appeal. Extradite to chile for torture and death while head of state the. Amnesty allowed to pp. HL decided to extradite. Lord Hoffman director of amnesty. Not fair. Need to be completely unbiased

29
Q

Judicial review

A

-Shows independence
-Hearing in DC of QBD, decisions of gov ministers can be challenged by a person who has standing.
-R v Home Secretary ex party fire brigades (changes to crim injuries comp scheme by Home Secretary unlawful)

30
Q

Human rights

A

-Able to hear cases abt human rights
-H rights act 1998 incorporates ECHR into uk law, judges have power to declare act is incompatible with convention
H v Menta health review tribunal

31
Q

Advantages of judiciary

A

-diversity grad improving. 1967 2.7% female now over 50%. Only 10% BAME. In 1990s no BAME
-Judicial appointment council aware, 5 yr plan to inc diversity
-highly educated
-lots of judges middle aged, lost of experience with law
-more women. 2020 32% court judges, 26% superior judges, SC 2 female members.

32
Q

Disadv of judiciary

A

-White upper class men. Not modern Britain, mistrust
-Many educated at private school and oxford/cambridge 90% of HL/coa went to Oxbridge but inferior penny derbyshire, no district went to private. 1997-99 73% to public. Only 1/6 district oxbridge (mag)
-middle age when appointed, out of touch w society. Need a lot of experience. Late 40s for HC
-only 23% women in coa and 27% HC. Not rep of female pop

33
Q

Advantages of judicial independence

A

-protects liberty of indiv from abuse of power by exec. If gov could control judge decisions, opponents of gov imprisoned
-Gov can’t force to resign if gov disagrees. Judicial review judges have to decide if an act by govv is reasonable, important to be carried out without fear Sirros v Moore. Detention.
-public confidence, impartial only evidence, pinochet
-reinforces sep of powers - overlap between P and gov so good judiciary more separate, protects rule of law

34
Q

Disadvantages of judicial independence

A

-can protect against unlawful acts of gov, judges independent, decisions are made based on facts and case law
-p sovereignty, can’t be challenged
-bias judge personal opinion
-tenure judges not challenged
-inferior judges removed by lord chancellor or chief justice. Overlap with other arms