The Interactionist Approach Flashcards
The diathesis-stress model: Vulnerability + trigger = SZ
Diathesis means vulnerability. Stress in this context refers to negative experiences that trigger the vulnerability
The diathesis-stress model says both a vulnerability and a trigger are needed to develop SZ. Individually may not create SZ - it is the interaction that is key
The diathesis-stress model: Meehl’s model, diathesis is genetic
In the original diathesis-stress model, diathesis was entirely the result of a single ‘schizogene’
Meehl (1962) argued that someone without this gene should never develop SZ, no matter how much stress they were exposed to
But a person who does have the gene is vulnerable to the effects of chronic stress (especially schizophrenogenic mother)
The schizogene is necessary but not sufficient for the development of SZ
The diathesis-stress model: Modern understanding of diathesis
It is now believed that diathesis is not due to a single ‘schizogene’. Instead it is thought that many genes increase vulnerability
Also, diathesis doesn’t have to be genetic. It could be early psychological trauma affecting brain development
For example, child abuse affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system, making a child vulnerable to stress
The diathesis-stress model: Modern understanding of stress
A modern definition of stress includes anything that risks triggering SZ. Can be psychological (e.g. parenting) or biological (e.g. cannabis use)
Cannabis use can increase the risk of SZ up to 7x depending on the dose because it interferes with the dopamine system
Treatment according to the interactionist model: Antipsychotic medication and CBT
Antipsychotic drugs taken in combination with CBT
But this requires adopting an interactionist model - it is not possible to adopt a purely biological approach, tell patients that their condition is purely biological and then treat them with CBT (Turkington et al. 2006)
Treatment according to the interactionist model: UK adopts more interactionist approach compared to US
In Britain it is increasingly standard practice to treat patients with a combination of drugs and CBT
In the US there is more of a conflict between psychological and biological models of SZ and this may have led to slower adoption of the interactionist approach