The Intentional Torts, Definitions, Factors, Defenses Flashcards

1
Q

Def. of Battery

A

The intentional, unlawful, harmful or offensive, touching of another, whether direct or indirect, without justification or excuse

i. Direct: no agent
ii. Indirect: you have an agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Public Policy of Battery

A

Public Policy

a. Protects bodily integrity !!!
b. Personal dignity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Requirements of Battery

A

a. Def. Committed the act intentionally
b. Def. reasonably foreseen (general or specific intent) that his act will bring about a harmful touching or injurious contact
c. Plantiff does not have to be consciously aware of the contact for a battery to occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rules of Battery

A

a. Touch must be either harmful or offensive
i. From the eyes of an objectively reasonable person
ii. ONLY argue one of the elements (harmful OR offensive) No pts if you argue both !!!
b. If person has known sensitivity, and you still act with intent ! Battery

c. Injury not required (offensive)
d. Awareness not required (doctors touch while patient under anesthesia)

e. The mere touching of another in anger is battery.

i.Typically you don’t have to
prove angry, rude, or insolent manner.

ii.Your motive does not negate intent

f. Touching others is often a result of “this busy world”
Without this, there would be a lawsuit for everything

g. One does not have to be consciously aware of the contact for a battery to occur!!
h. Contact may be satisfied by agency theory

 i. Children's Privilege 
 i. Children may not be liable if the touching is characteristic of children's activities & play
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Touch as it relates to Battery

A

Accomplished by touching something DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY intimately connected to that person

Indirect: using another party or object to commit a tort. Setting in motion a chain of events that brings
about harmful or offensive touching to another. (Ex. Shooting a gun, throwing a rock)

Direct: using my own body to commit a tort

If someone hits a plate out of your hand it is intimately connected it is therefore direct touching
(Ex. Punching in the face, knocking a plate out of someone’s hand because it is intimately
connected to their person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Agency Theory as it relates to Torts

A

Agency Theory:

one who uses an implement of something to accomplish a tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Def. of Assault

A

Intentional, unlawful, placing of another in apprehension of imminent bodily contact with the apparent ability to carry out the contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Requirements for Assualt

A

The key is that the person HAS to be in mental apprehension

  1. Apprehension is not fear, it is something less than fear
    ii. Mental discomfort
    iii. Seizing of the mind

AND

  1. Awareness
  2. Immediate Imminence
  3. No contact needed

AAIN (all assault is negative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rules for Assault

A

a. Leering and puckering is NOT assault

b. Mere preparation is not enough
i. Gathering sticks to hit people
ii.There must be more of an OVERT ACT
1. Extent of the activity
Apprehension and ABILITY to Follow through

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Negations of Assault

A

i. Future threats must be an immediate threat
ii. Conditional Threats
1. Unless under unlawful condition or duress “$ or your life”
2. “I would punch you in the eye if you weren’t already blind in one eye”

iii.Words
1. Offensive words do not constitute assault unless
a. One is aware of another sensitivity and seeks to exploit it, then there is assault
b. Someone says look behind you, there is a clown and they know that you are
afraid of clowns, but there is not a clown really there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Assault and Apprehension

A

Mere apprehension is not enough, must have the ability to carry out the assault as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Def. of False imprisonment

A

a. Intentional, unlawful, restraint of another to a bounded or confined area by force or threat of force, where one is aware of the confinement or harmed by it (w/out justification or excuse)
i. Awareness needs to be at the time of imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Public Policy considerations for False Imprisonment

A

your dignity is important

Your freedom to move about is important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Requirements for false imprisonment

A

a. Restraint of an individual against their will

b. Unlawfulness of such restraint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rules for false imprisonment

A

a. π must be unaware of any and all reasonable existing escapes
b. π must indicate desire to leave
c. Majority Rule: FI if you are confined or harmed
d. Minority Rule: Awareness only

e. Scope:
i. A country is too vast for FI
ii. Only arises when one cannot leave and not if one cannot enter
iii. May occur if one has the duty to do so, but does not provide the means of leaving
f. Escape
i. If there is a means of escape and P is unaware, D is still liable
ii. Defendant is not liable if P takes dangerous means of escape and is injured, when able to remain in safe confinement
iii. D is liable if the P is injured in taking a dangerous means of escape if there is also danger in remaining in confinement
iv. If there is an unsafe means of a escape, the P does not have to take it, and D is still held liable g. Duress
i. You feel compelled & they put pressure on you that you feel you cannot leave
ii. Rules
1. Restraint needn’t be physical
2. Keeping valuable property–>Duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Negations for false imprisonment

A

a. Plantiff No awareness
c. Future threats
i. But words one is afraid to disregard may be FI
d. Voluntarily detained
e. Good faith DOES NOT negate offense

17
Q

Actual Confinement for FI

A

Actual physical bearing

b. Overpowering force or actual physical force
c. Submission to a threat to apply physical force
d. Submission under duress of physical force (EX “if you don’t come, I’ll kill your family”)

18
Q

Moral Persuasion for FI

A

a. Does not constitute restraint
b. When one willfully stays for confrontation/questioning of their own volition (No FI) - c. Internal Force
i. One remains under one’s own rule- FI
d. External Force
i. Present if no moral persuasion

19
Q

Quantify Confinement for FI

A

a. Actual physical barriers
b. Submission to a threat of physical force
c. Force or threat of force
d. Actual physical force
e. Submission to duress
f. Take someone into custody under legal authority

20
Q

False arrest (is a sub tort of what)

A

When one is taken into custody by a person who claims, but does not have, the proper legal authority to do so

FI

21
Q

What are the Public Policy considerations for FA

A

i. Protects personal dignity
ii. Protects individual freedom
iii. Protects liberty to move about
iv. Protects independence & autonomy

False arrest

22
Q

What are negations for false arrest?

A

NEGATED WHEN
i.Conviction for the crime for which one is arrested is a defense to false arrest claim,: regardless of unreasonableness of the arrest
ii.If officer has Probable cause
iii.Officer requests private citizens help, they are not liable unless citizen knows arrest is unlawful 1. A private citizen who aids an officer in making a false arrest when there has been no
request, the citizen can be held liable for false imprisonment or false arrest
2. No claim if one has proper claim or warrant