The idea of a Social Contract Flashcards
What is Political authority?
Right to rule
- right to legislate
- right to impose taxation
- right to encore the law etc.
What is a social contract?
Mutual consent to confer political authority to a person or a small set of persons establishes their right to rule
Hobbes distinguishes between two types of social contract?
Commonwealth by institution
Commonwealth by Acquisition
What is common wealth by institution?
Mutual consent (by majority) to obey a common political authority
What is commonwealth by acquisition?
Promising obedience to a conqueror
Why does Hobbes think that both types of social contract are equally legitimate?
Both are grounded in consent
Commonwealth by acquisition is also grounded in consent of those subjected, not in rights associated with victory
Hobbes understands parents authority over their children as a case of authority by acquisition
Hobbes affirms a natural (liberty) right to secure one’s self-preservation. (What is this liberty right?)
“The right of nature… is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature, that is to say, of his own life, and consequently of doing anything which, in his own judgement and reason, he shall conceive to be the aptest means thereunto”
How do people give up their right to all things?
Through the social contract, individuals give up their right to all things, thus creating obligations for themselves
Giving up a liberty right?
To law down a man’s right to anything is to divest himself of the liberty of hindering another of the benefit of his own right to the same
Giving up right either through renouncing or transferring.
Renouncing means?
Renouncing is general
Transferring means?
transferring is to a specific person or assembly of persons
Political obligation
Conseting to social contract creates obligations towards the state
The rationality of cooperation?
Hobbes intends to argue that because state of nature is so grim, it is rational for us to consent to a social contract
How is this argument supposed to work?
Rationality interpretation/ Problems
It shows that avoiding the state of nature is desirable
However it also shows that not cooperation, is rational
Therefore, the conclusion that consenting to obey a political authority is rational does not follow
In addition, it seems wrong: surely, co-operation is rational?
Passion interpretation/problems
Passion interpretation shows that it is rational to cooperate
If cooperation is rational, however, why is the state of nature so bad?
Do we not have, even in the state of nature, resources to avoid a war of all against all
This interpretation thus does not seem to support the need for political institutions