The Forsaken Wife - Line-by-Line Explanation & Analysis Flashcards
Lines 1-4:
Methinks ‘tis strange you can’t afford
One pitying look, one parting word;
Humanity claims this as its due,
But what’s humanity to you?
How does the poem begin?
Lines 1-4 begin the poem on a note of sarcastic anger.
Lines 1-4:
Methinks ‘tis strange you can’t afford
One pitying look, one parting word;
Humanity claims this as its due,
But what’s humanity to you?
What is the main idea in Lines 1-4?
The title character, “The Forsaken Wife,” shames her unfaithful husband—the man who has forsaken, or abandoned, her—for leaving without any kind of proper goodbye:
Lines 1-4:
Methinks ‘tis strange you can’t afford
One pitying look, one parting word;
Humanity claims this as its due,
But what’s humanity to you?
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
Using bitter understatement (and the archaic words “Methinks ‘tis,” meaning “I think it is”), she tells him that she finds his icy behavior “strange.”
It soon becomes clear later in the poem, that she finds it a lot more than strange: she finds it “Cruel” and heartless.
Lines 1-4:
Methinks ‘tis strange you can’t afford
One pitying look, one parting word;
Humanity claims this as its due,
But what’s humanity to you?
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
He could, of course, “afford” a compassionate “look” or a “word” of goodbye; he just chooses not to spare them.
He’s broken his marriage vows and dumped her cold.
The /w/ and /p/ alliteration of line 2 (“One pitying look, one parting word”) underscores her outrage at his behavior.
Lines 1-4:
Methinks ‘tis strange you can’t afford
One pitying look, one parting word;
Humanity claims this as its due,
But what’s humanity to you?
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
In the speaker’s view, everyone feels they’re owed at least some pity, or some kind of goodbye, when their romantic partner leaves them.
It’s just a basic expectation of “Humanity.”
Lines 1-4:
Methinks ‘tis strange you can’t afford
One pitying look, one parting word;
Humanity claims this as its due,
But what’s humanity to you?
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
She then asks a sharp rhetorical question.
The question implies that the husband doesn’t care about “humanity” at all.
Notice that this word can have two meanings: humankind or humane behavior.
In a kind of pun, the speaker implies that the selfish husband has no interest in either.
Lines 1-4:
Methinks ‘tis strange you can’t afford
One pitying look, one parting word;
Humanity claims this as its due,
But what’s humanity to you?
What does the opening lines (Lines 1-4) establish?
These opening lines establish that the poem will consist of rhyming couplets stacked up to form larger stanzas.
They also provide a succinct, powerful introduction to the voice of the speaker, who is not identical with the poet but rather a character in a dramatic monologue.
The poem captures this character at a moment of intense emotion, as her anger at her cheating husband boils over.
Lines 5-8:
Cruel man! I am not blind,
Your infidelity I find;
Your want of love my ruin shows,
My broken heart, your broken vows.
What is the main idea in Lines 5-8?
In lines 5-8, the speaker’s bitter sarcasm turns to blunt anger.
She condemns her husband for his “Cruel[ty]” and “infidelity,” portraying him as heartless and dishonest
Lines 5-8:
Cruel man! I am not blind,
Your infidelity I find;
Your want of love my ruin shows,
My broken heart, your broken vows.
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
“I am not blind” means, in effect, “I’m not deceived” or “I see who you really are.”
Lines 5-8:
Cruel man! I am not blind,
Your infidelity I find;
Your want of love my ruin shows,
My broken heart, your broken vows.
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
She’s found out about her husband’s cheating (“infidelity”); in other words, she knows he’s leaving her for someone else, not just abandoning the marriage.
Lines 5-8:
Cruel man! I am not blind,
Your infidelity I find;
Your want of love my ruin shows,
My broken heart, your broken vows.
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
She declares that “my ruin shows”—that is, her wrecked life proves—the husband’s “want of love” (“want” here means lack), her own “broken heart,” and his “broken [marriage] vows.”
(The inverted syntax in line 7—”Your want of love my ruin shows” rather than “My ruin shows your want of love”—is a common technique in older poetry.)
All in all, she feels devastated and betrayed.
Lines 5-8:
Cruel man! I am not blind,
Your infidelity I find;
Your want of love my ruin shows,
My broken heart, your broken vows.
In these lines, what shows her vehement anger and outburst of emotion?
The emphatic repetitions in this passage, including the “Your”/”Your” anaphora in lines 6-7 and the two “broken”s in line 8, help convey the speaker’s vehement anger.
The exclamation point after “Cruel man” is the only one in the poem, and seems to represent an outburst of emotion after the relatively restrained verbal irony of the first stanza.
Lines 9-12:
Yet maugre all your rigid hate,
I will be true in spite of fate;
And one preeminence I’ll claim,
To be forever still the same.
What is the main idea in lines 9-12?
There’s an emotional shift in lines 9-12, signaled by the word “Yet” in line 9.
As devastated as the speaker feels, she’s settled on a path forward, at least in terms of her emotional response to her husband’s betrayal.
Lines 9-12:
Yet maugre all your rigid hate,
I will be true in spite of fate;
And one preeminence I’ll claim,
To be forever still the same.
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
The word “maugre” is an archaic synonym for “despite,” so the speaker means that despite her husband’s “rigid hate” (unshakable hostility toward her), she will remain “true” to her marriage vows.
Lines 9-12:
Yet maugre all your rigid hate,
I will be true in spite of fate;
And one preeminence I’ll claim,
To be forever still the same.
Explain and analyse the part in “bold”.
She will do so “in spite of fate,” meaning in spite of her misfortune, or in spite of whatever fortune might still hold in store.
(In the strictly patriarchal society of 18th-century England, women abandoned by their husbands typically faced financial hardship, social ostracism, and other difficulties.)