The First Amendment Flashcards
Free speech methodologies
- Content-based v. content-neutral restrictions
- Prior restraints
- Vagueness and overbreadth
- Symbolic speech
- Anonymous Speech
- Speech by the government
Content-based restrictions
Content-based restrictions on speech generally must meet strict scrutiny.
Two type of content based laws:
- subject matter restrictions (application of the law depends on the topic of the message)
- viewpoint restrictions (application of the law depends on the ideology of the message)
Content-neutral laws
Content-neutral laws burdening speech generally need only meet intermediate scrutiny
(law applies to all speech the same)
Prior restraints
- Judicial order stopping speech before it occurs
- Court orders suppressing speech must meet strict scrutiny.
- Procedurally proper court orders must be complied with until they are vacated or overturned.
- A person who violates a court order is barred from later challenging it.
- The government can require a license for speech only if there is an important reason for licensing and clear criteria leaving almost no discretion to the licensing authority.
- Licensing schemes must contain procedural safeguards such as prompt determination of requests for licenses and judicial review
Vagueness
A law is unconstitutionally vague if a reasonable person
cannot tell what speech is prohibited and what is allowed
Overbreadth
A law is unconstitutionally overbroad if it regulates
substantially more speech than the constitution allows to be regulated.
Fighting Words
Fighting words laws are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad
Symbolic speech
The government can regulate conduct that communicates
if it has an important interest unrelated to suppression of the message and if the impact on communication is no greater than necessary to achieve the government’s purpose
Examples of Protected & Unprotected Symbolic Speech
- flag burning is constitutionally protected speech
- draft card burning is not constitutionally protected speech
- local governments may prohibit nude dancing
- burning a cross is protected speech unless it is done with the intent to threaten
- contribution limits in election campaigns are generally constitutional, but expenditure limits are unconstitutional, even when applied to corporations
Anonymous speech
Anonymous speech is protected
Speech by the government
Speech by the government cannot be challenged as violating the First Amendment.
What speech is unprotected or less protected by the First Amendment?
- Incitement of illegal activity
- Obscenity and sexually-oriented speech
- Commercial speech
- Defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress
- Privacy
- Speech by government employees
- Violent Speech
Other government restrictions based on the content of speech must meet strict scrutiny.
Incitement of illegal activity
The government may punish speech if there is a substantial likelihood of imminent illegal activity and if the speech is directed to causing imminent illegality.
The Test for Obscenity and sexually-oriented speech
- The material must appeal to the prurient interest
- The material must be patently offensive under the law prohibiting obscenity
- Taken as a whole, the material must lack serious redeeming artistic, literary, political or scientific value
Prurient Interest
Local/comm Standard:
shameful or morbid interest in sex (lustful or insidious does not rise to prurient)
patently offensive under the law
prohibiting obscenity
Local/State Standard
lack serious redeeming
artistic, literary, political or scientific value
Value determined by national, not local standard
Regulation of Obscenity Rules
- The government may use zoning ordinances to regulate the location of adult bookstores and movie theaters
- Child pornography may be completely banned, even if not obscene
- (To be child pornography, children must be used in production of the material).
- The government may not punish private possession of obscene materials; but the government may punish private possession of child pornography
- The government may seize the assets of businesses convicted of violating obscenity laws
- all of the assets, even if not obscene