The existence of God and revelation Flashcards
The Design Argument- what do theists argue?
- Most agree that the universe and life was created for a purpose by God and that the universe was not a result of an accident or random chance.
- They argue that nature is so intricate and complex that God must have designed it.
Genesis 1 account of creation- most Christians believe this supports the design argument because it shows God developed the universe
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Genesis 1:1
The Design Argument- what would an atheist argue?
- The universe has evolved naturally and was not created.
- Theists are not able to produce God as evidence for their argument.
The Design argument- what would an agnostic say?
-It is impossible to know for certain that God exists.
Theist definition
A person who belives in God
atheist definition
a person who believes there is no God
agnostic definition
someone who thinks there is not enough evidence for belief in God
William Paley’s Design Argument
- If we found a watch which we knew nothing about, its intricate workings would show that it had been put together deliberately for a purpose.
- It’s pieces could not have come together by themselves so someone must have designed it- a watchmaker
- Like the watch there is evidence for design in the natural world eg: the eye for sight (just right for its purpose).
- the universe is far more complicated than a watch and like it, it must have a designer-God
Isaac Newton’s Design argument
- Your thumb gives your hand precise and delicate movement only found in humans and some primates
- every thumbprint is different and unique to the individual
- Therefore, the design of the thumb is sufficient evidence of God’s existence
Thomas Aquinas’ Design Argument
- Thomas Aquinas said that only an intelligent being can keep things in regular order.
- The planets, sun, moon and stars rotate in the solar system in a set way because God holds them in place.
A modern Design Argument
- F.R. Tennant argued that God designed the world so that everything was just right for human life to develop.
- If the strength of gravity and the power and speed of the explosion caused by the Big Bang has been even a little bit different, life would not exist.
- Appears to have been deliberate.
Objections to the Design Arguments
- since the process of natural selection happens by chance, species designed themselves over time. Everything is a result of evolution, not a designer God
- If God designed the universe, why is there so much suffering in the world?
- the order in the universe is necessary to support life, so it merely gives the appearance of design.
Isaac Newton Design Argument quote
“In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God’s existence.”
Buddhism beliefs about God
- non-theistic religion
- Buddhists aim to liberate themselves from suffering by moving towards enlightenment
- Buddhist traditions acknowledge the presence of many kinds of spirits and gods but not a creator God who is responsible for everything.
The first Cause argument -theists
- some theists would use the existence of the universe to prove that God exists
arguments: - everything that exists or begins to exist must have a cause
-the universe exists and began to exist, so must have a cause too - there had to be something eternal that was not caused by anything
-therefore God exists
-the universe had a beginning and God was the start of the chain of events, which led to the present/ If the universe had no beginning - no explanation for its existence.
What is the first cause argument also called?
The Cosmological argument
What does the first cause argument depend on?
-the belief that the universe had a beginning and a cause like all other things that exist.
Scientists belief- first cause argument
- most accept the universe began as a result of the Big Bang
- what existed before the Big Bang?
- there must have been a cause for the Big Bang and the start of the universe
What would modern theists argue for the Big Bang?
God was the eternal, uncaused cause of the Big Bang
What would a theist argue about the First Cause Argument?
- The universe had a beginning and God was the start of a chain of events, which led to the present
- universe had no beginning then there would be no adequate explanation for its existence
Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument
- argued that everything we observe is caused to exist
- nothing can become something by itself unless something is added to it
- since nothing we observe can cause itself to exist, there are only two possibilities:
. there is an infinite chain of effects preceded by causes
. there must be a first cause which by definition must be uncaused. - however, an inifinite sequence of causes and effects is impossible because it would have taken us an infinite amount of time to reach
- so there must be a first cause which by definition is uncaused, and Aquinas believed that this was God. The universe exists so Aquinas argued that it must have had a creator to begin with, God.
What are objections to the First Cause Argument?
- Atheists say the argument contradicts itself: if everything we see in the world has a cause, what caused God
- If you say that God is eternal and has always existed, why couldn’t the universe have always existed too?
- Just because events and things have causes does not mean the universe has a cause
- the Big Bang was a random, spontaneous event, not an action by God
- Religious creation stories are just myths ( tell spiritual, rather than truth)
- although we generally think everything must have a cause, perhaps there are some things we don’t know about that don’t have causes.
- even if there was a such thigng as an uncaused cause, this does not prove that the cause was God.
How would theists counter objections to the First Cause Argument?
- only God is eternal, beyond time and space
- the cause of the Big Bang is not yet known so why couldn’t it be God?
Why did Thomas Aquinas say that God does not have a cause?
Because he is eternal
If God had needed a cause to begin his existence, he would
not be all powerful and so would not be God. Since God is all powerful, he cannot have a cause.
What is a Buddhist response to the First Cause argument?
- the idea of causation and the First Cause argument is based on the idea that the universe is linear: it began and will end
- However, Buddhism presents a vision of the universe that is more like an endless cycle- samsara: endless process of birth, death and rebirth. No absolute beginning and end (like a circle).
- the Buddhist response is that the universe never began
- there was no beginning of time and there will be no end of time, instead there is just endless change
What is a Buddhist response to the Design Argument?
- Buddhism does not teach there is a creator God who designed the universe
- it teaches that all things come into existence when the necessary conditions are there
- life first came into existence when the necessary conditions were present for this to happen
- this process of change happens by itself, without any help from an outside creator or God.
What is the problem with evil and suffering?
- if God really is benevolent and created a good world, how can there be so much evil in it?
- some people argue that God, being good, could not have created a world that allows so much evil
- therefore he didn’t create the world and doesn’t exist
- if he did create a world that allows so much evil, he is not really benevolent or omnipotent (with the power to destroy all evil) as he can not permit all of the evil that goes on in life.
Why is a counter argument to the problem of evil and suffering?
- God gave humans free will
- allows people to choose how they act- good/evil
- he can’t stop people as it would be undermining their free will
What is the problem with the free will argument to account for the evil and suffering in the world?
- this argument does not address evil situations that are not caused by human choice, eg: natural disasters (earthquakes, famines) that cause many people to die
- moreover, some people say the free-will argument does not help to explain why animals suffer (because they do not have free will).
How do some people try to explain that God and evil both exist?
Suffering and evil offer the chance for spiritual growth. Through confronting and overcoming evil, human beings develop spiritually. Suffering also enables people to recognise what is truly valuable.
What are Buddhist viewpoints on evil?
- it is perfectly understandable that evil exists
- According to Buddhism, people act in evil ways because they are in the grip of greed, hatred and ignorance
- Each person has the ability to act in a good or evil way, a lot of the time they do not have enough awareness to be able to make good choices
- Buddhism teaches that people who do evil are not punished by God- suffer consequences of actions because of Kamma.
Why is it sometimes said that Buddhists believe in an ‘ethical universe?’
- it does not necessarily mean that people are always punished by the law for their evil
- it means that, because of kamma, evl actions will always lead to suffering for the person who acts in an evil way
- usually means that others suffer too
What do Buddhists believe about natural disasters?
- not punishments for acting in an evil way
- caused by biological and climatic conditions
famine- not a bad person
What do some people argue about the Buddhist problem to evil and suffering?
- can’t explain the existence of good but can explain the existence of evil
- if all beings are driven by greed, hatred or ignorance, where does the impulse towards enlightenment come from?
- within each person there is the essence of the Buddha that, given the right conditions, can grow into enlightenment.
How do some atheists and humanists use developments in scientic knowledge to challenge belief in God?
- some people use the theory of evolution to argue that God did not create life. Instead, it just happened by chance through the process of natural selection.
What do Buddhists believe about whether science proves or disproves the existence of a creator God?
- they do not believe in a God so this question is not relevant to Buddhism. Buddhists do not regard scientific explanations as presenting a challenge to Buddhist teachings.
If Christians and other theists accept the Big Bang theory, what would they also argue?
God was the cause of the Big Bang.
What is a miracle?
-It is a seemingly impossible event, usually good, that cannot be explained by natural or scientific laws.
What do Christians believe a true miracle is?
An event performed by God. eg: recovering from an illness when doctors had given up hope and avoiding certain death from a freak accident.
What would theists argue a miracle shows?
-That there is religious significance or purpose to the event, such as to strengthen faith or to show God’s love.
Is having a baby a miracle?
No, unless a person is rendered never to have a child and they do. Depends on people’s interpretation.
What are the two types of miracles?
1, events that break natural laws and cannot be explained by science eg: Jesus is said to have turned water into wine at the marriage in Cana
2, Happy coincidences in which no natural laws are broken but a coincidence occurs at just the right moment to cause a good outcome eg: a train stops just in time to prevent an accident.