The Executive Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

The presidents powers

A
  • execute laws
  • commander and chief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Youngstown

A

facts: steel mill workers about to strike, the president ordered that they not because steel is important to wars and he is commander and chief

Rule of law: The presidents power to issue executive orders must come from either an act of Congress or the Constitution.
- Justice Jackson analysis: this had nothing to do with the war!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hamdi

A
  • facts: Congress passed an act that granted power to the president to use force when we were at war. American citizen who was in Afghanistan was taken into custody by the US and alleged an enemy combatant. He was sent to Guantanamo Bay and not given the chance to prove himself innocent.

Rule of law: Due Process guarantees that US citizens held as enemy combatants must be given due process.

The court uses the Matthew balancing test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Matthew Balancing Test

A
  1. the gravity of a person being deprived of an interest
  2. risk of erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedure being used
  3. how much harm the gov will face if we give more process?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Thomas Dissent in Hamdi

A

Should be left up to congress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Scalia Dissent in Hamdi

A

we are weighing Hamdi’s rights over the the governments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Boumediene v. Bush

A

Facts: Petitioners are aliens designated as enemy combatants and held at Guantanamo.

Rule: Writ of habeas can be given to foreigners.
The Suspension Clause states that the writ of habeas corpus may be suspended only in cases of rebellion or invasion when public safety requires it. Courts must provide detainees held as unlawful alien combatants a writ of habeas corpus to challenge their detention, or, if a writ of habeas corpus is not available, provide an adequate substitute process for detainees that includes the same procedural protections and opportunities that would be provided in a writ of habeas corpus

habeas corpus can only be withdrawn by the suspension clause .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Three facts are relevant when determining the scope of the suspension clause.

A
  1. The citizenship status of the detainee and the adequacy of the process that determines the status.
  2. The nature of the sites where apprehension and then detention took place.
  3. The practical obstacles inherent in resolving the prisoner’s entitlement to the writ.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dissents in Boumedience

A

Roberts, Thomas Alito Scalia

i. Roberts- writ of habeas corpus is not necessary for detainees as they are given hearings to contest.
ii. Scalia- suspension clause is only for us citizens.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Pre Trump v. Hawaii, we have:

Korematsu

A
  • racist ruling stating that upheld the constitutionality of internment camps during World War II
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Trump v. Hawaii

A

Rule: S court reviewing a presidential order restricting entry into the US of a person from specific nations is ground for rational basis review. which means that they can basically get away with it because it is not strict.

facts - trump trying to keep muslims out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Majority in trump v Hawaii

A

majority- Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Thomas
i. This does not have to do with equal protection because it does not identify a racial group, sexual group, or economic group. This was about keeping Muslim c countries out of the country, but the majority tried to get around that by saying it was never called a “Muslim ban” even though that is what Trump alluded to during his candidacy.
1. He brings up Korematsu and says that the ruling here is completely different. He even overrules Korematsu (to save face perhaps).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

concurrence in Trump v. Hawaii- Clarence Thomas

A

does not believe in universal injunctions.
universal injunction- this does not stop just stop the gov from implementing a rule at those in the suit, but at everyone it could apply to. `

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dissent in trump v. Hawaii

A

Sotomayor, kagan, Breyer, RBG

THIS IS KOREMATSU ALL OVER AGAIN. WE ARE GLAD KOREMATSU IS OVERRULED BUT THIS IS TERRIBLE TOO.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly