The Exclusive Rules of Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Exclusive Rules of Evidence

A
  • Veracity, propensity, opinion, hearsay, identification, improperly obtained evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Veracity - Substantially Helpful

A

VERACITY RULES (S37) - SUBSTANTIALLY HELPFUL (judge to consider)

  • Bias on part of the person
  • Any previous inconsistent statements made by the person
  • A motive on part of the person to be untruthful
  • Person has been convicted of 1 or more offences that indicate a propensity for dishonesty/lack of veracity
  • Lack of veracity on part of person when under legal obligation to tell the truth

Not sufficient where prosecution wish to offer evidence about a defendants veracity and where defendant offers veracity evidence about codefendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prosecution May Only Offer Veracity If

A

VERACITY EVIDENCE BY PROSECUTION ONLY IF (S38) -
2(a) Defendant has offered evidence about their veracity or has challenged the veracity of a prosecution witness by reference other than the facts about in issue
2(b) and Judge permits the prosecution to do so.

  • must show veracity is relevant
  • defendant has offered evidence about their veracity/other prosecution witness
  • proposed evidence mets substantial helpfulness test
  • prosecution get permission from judge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In Determining Veracity Evidence

A

JUDGE TO CONSIDER 38(2) TAKE INTO ACCOUNT
38(3) - extent to which defendants or prosecutions witnesses veracity has been put in issue
- time elapsed since any conviction in which prosecution is looking to give evidence
- if any evidence given by the defendant was elicited by the prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Propensity Requirements

A

PROPENSITY ADMISSIBILITY (S40)

  • Shows propensity to act in particular way/state of mind related to evidence of acts/omissions/circumstances which person is alleged to have been involved
  • Have probative value in relation to issue in dispute
  • Have a probative value that outweighs the risk that the evidence may have an unfairly prejudicial effect on defendant

(b) does not include evidence of act/omission that is one of the elements of the offence for which person is being prosecuted or cause of action in the current proceeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Veracity/Propensity and Bail/Sentencing

A

VERACITY/PROPENSITY and BAIL/SENTENCING
- Does not apply unless evidence relates directly/indirectly to sexual experience of the complainant with any other person other than defendant or their reputation in sexual matters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Exclusion of Opinion Evidencs

A

EXCLUSION OF OPINION EVIDENCE/UNRELIABILITY (except S24/S25)

  • Bare opinion holds little probative weight
  • Danger it could usurp function of the tribunal of fact. Could confuse the tribunal of fact (which is to draw inferences from facts presented) and prolong proceedings
  • Opinion may be based on other evidence which if stated expressly would be inadmissible- largely propensity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

General Admissibility of Opinion

A

NON-EXPERT OPINION EVIDENCE
To be admissible under S24:
- Must be the only way which they can effectively communicate the information to the fact finder
- Must be stating an opinion from something they personally perceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Expert Evidence Requirement

A

EXPERT EVIDENCE ADMISSIBILITY S25

  • Be that of an expert
  • Comprise of expert evidence
  • Offer SUBSTANTIAL HELP to the fact-finder in understanding other evidence or ascertaining any fact in the proceeding that is of consequence in the determination of the proceeding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Qualification of an Expert (S4)

A

QUALIFICATION OF EXPERT
Expert is required to demonstrate to court they have specialised knowledge/skill based on study/training/experience.
Judge to decide if properly qualified - expert is required to demonstrate they have requisite qualification in their field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hearsay Circumstances Reliability

A

HEARSAY RELIABILITY (S16(1) CIRCUMSTANCES)

  • Nature of the statement
  • Contents if the statement
  • Circumstances around making of the statement
  • Circumstances to veracity if person making statement
  • Circumstances regarding accuracy of the observations of the person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hearsay Rule

A

HEARSAY RULE (S17(1))

  • (a) Hearsay not admissible except as provided by this subpart or by the provisions of any other Act
  • (b) Or in cases where the Act provide that this subpart does not apply and the hearsay statement is relevant and not otherwise admissible under this Act.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is Hearsay Generally Excluded

A

HEARSAY EXCLUSION

  • Where statement maker is not a witness there is no opportunity to cross-examine regarding content
  • Juries can’t evaluate evidence properly without being able to see demeanour of original statement maker
  • Danger that witnesses will make mistakes about content/meaning of statement made by other people e.g. Chinese whispers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly