The Eurozone Flashcards
The Eurozone
The Eurozone is a common currency area or a monetary union.
» Eurozone also referred to as the European Monetary Union (EMU).
The Eurozone is a variant of a fixed exchange rate regime. Therefore, when looking at the Eurozone:
» monetary policy in an open economy under fixed exchange rates.
The theory of the optimum currency area
The theory of an optimum currency area (Mundell, 1961):
» points to the costs and benefits of a country giving up independent
monetary policy and an independent exchange rate. Considerations of joining a common currency area.
For example, why did the following countries join the Eurozone?
» Germany:
‘Level playing field’ where other European countries could not gain a competitive advantage.
» Italy, Spain and Greece: Low and stable inflation.
Microeconomic benefits of joining a common currency area
higher trade and investment due to elimination of foreign exchange rate risk
resource savings
increased competition
increased liquidity in financial markets
- it is argued that monetary integration stimulates higher trade and investment, due to the fact that adoption of a single currency eliminates foreign exchange rate risk.
- Real resource savings arise from eliminating transactions costs that are incurred by cur- rency conversion.
- Competition in goods and labour markets would be expected to increase due to greater ease of price and wage comparisons. More competition, in turn, would be expected to produce both static and dynamic efficiency gains
- Monetary union is expected to increase the liquidity of financial markets. This is of par- ticular benefit for small member countries. More liquid financial markets can also bring dangers of resource misallocation
Macroeconomic benefits of joining a common currency area
reduction in exchange rate volatility
delegation authority for monetary policy: importation of stable inflation
avoidance of competitive devaluation by members of a CCA
costs joining a common currency area
giving up an independent monetary policy and exchange rate regime
The Eurozone’s performance in its first 10 years
Eurozone’s performance as a whole prior to the GFC was good. Monetary policy:
» ECB’s performance was broadly successful. Fiscal policy: less successful.
Member countries individual performance pre-GFC was heterogeneous.
Indicators of imbalances
The real exchange rate.
Current account balances.
Public sector debt.
Private sector debt.
Variation in inflation in member countries.
The Eurozone policy regime
Maastricht Treaty 1992.
» Monetary policy - ECB responsible for:
responding to Euro-area wide (common) shocks.
delivering low and stable inflation in the Eurozone (Euro area).
» Fiscal policy - National governments responsible for:
fiscal sustainability and stabilising country-specific & asymmetric
shocks.
the Stability & Growth Pact (SGP) - specifies limit on national budget deficits (< 3%) and on government debt–to–GDP ratio (< 60%). SGP aims to prevent policies that threaten the ECB’s inflation objectives.
» Supply-side policy
National labour & product markets and supply-side policies determine equilibrium unemployment.
The Eurozone policy regime
Maastricht Treaty 1992.
» Monetary policy - ECB responsible for:
responding to Euro-area wide (common) shocks.
delivering low and stable inflation in the Eurozone (Euro area).
» Fiscal policy - National governments responsible for:
fiscal sustainability and stabilising country-specific & asymmetric
shocks.
the Stability & Growth Pact (SGP) - specifies limit on national budget deficits (< 3%) and on government debt–to–GDP ratio (< 60%). SGP aims to prevent policies that threaten the ECB’s inflation objectives.
» Supply-side policy
National labour & product markets and supply-side policies determine equilibrium unemployment.
Interest rate differentials
UIP condition with default risk
he risk-adjusted UIP condition says that a CCA member’s interest rate will be above the CCA interest rate to the extent that its nominal exchange rate is expected to depreciate and its risk of default on government debt exceeds that of the benchmark CCA government.
ln the Eurozone, the benchmark government debt is that issued by Germany (so-called German Bunds) and exchange rate risk is zero (as exchange rates are fixed between members). Hence, the difference between German and, for example, Greek interest rates on ten-year bonds reflects only the difference in default risk.
During the Eurozone’s first decade, interest differentials with Germany on long-term gov- ernment bonds were very small. How can this be explained?
- The markets viewed the likelihood of a default by a Eurozone government as being very low. For example, they considered the risk of a systemic banking crisis in a Eurozone member that would require a government rescue of banks as a very low probability event.
- The markets did not connect the divergent performance among Eurozone members with the possible implications for government solvency.
- The markets did not believe the Eurozone’s ‘no bail-out clause’ and took the view that any problem in one member government’s ability to service its debts would be solved by the ECB and/or by the other Eurozone governments.
In terms of the relationships among member governments and between them and the ECB, the central elements were:
- Government to government: the ‘no bail-out’ clause stated that other member govern- ments could not be called upon to bail out a government in trouble.
- ECB to government: the ‘no monetary financing’ clause stated that the ECB would not provide credit to governments {i.e. it would not be the lender of last resort to govern- ments).
- The fiscal rules: the entry rules for deficits and debt and the Stability and Growth Pact, which were designed to support {1) and (2).
Stabilisation in the Eurozone: common shocks
Two levels of stabilisation
1. At the Eurozone level (supra-national).
2. At the country-specific level (national).
ECB works as a single monetary policy maker in the Eurozone. ECB responds to common shocks: shocks that affects all members.
» By choosing the real interest rate to achieve its inflation target.
Stabilisation in the Eurozone: country-specific shocks - options available
Eurozone membership & vulnerability to a sovereign debt crisis
Why is a country in the Eurozone (CCA) vulnerable to a sovereign debt crisis?
No need for a fiscal union pre sovereign debt crisis.
What is the problem with this view?
When the government is the borrower, it is relying on its ability to raise tax revenue to provide confidence to the bond market that it will service its debts. it is clear that if the government is being called upon to use tax revenue to support failing banks (or there is a possibility it will have to do so), its ability to service its debt via tax revenue is reduced. This highlights the interconnection between the banks, the government and the bond market. We can see the parallel with the ‘last in line’ liquidity problem for banks (Chapter 5): if fear emerges that the government will not be able to service its debts, holders of bonds will sell them, prices will fall and, reflecting the rise in the risk premium, interest rates will rise.
How can this be prevented?
If the central bank is the lender of last resort to the government, it can be relied upon to step in and buy government bonds.
assume that the flight from government bonds is inconsistent with the underlying ability of the government to service its debts (i.e. the government is solvent) then the government is suffering from a liquidity problem. The central bank can step in by printing money Uust as it does in the case of dealing with the liquidity problem of the banking system) and buying government bonds. The central bank would end up with more government bonds on its balance sheet and the counterpart on the liability side is an increase in high-powered money.
The mutual support of the government and central bank for each other-the taxpayer base is the ultimate guarantee of the solvency of the government and of the central bank’s ability to buy government bonds in unlimited quantities {LOLR)-is shown by the double-ended arrow in Fig. 12.11.
Symptoms of a sovereign debt crisis
» An increase in a government’s default risk.
there are two aspects to this:
first, the member countries were issuing bonds in a currency (the euro) that they did not control and second, the central bank that issues the euros (the ECB) was pre- vented by its mandate from acting as lender of last resort to the governments of member states.
This created the fear of illiquidity of the government, i.e. that it would not be able to rollover its debts as they became due. As a result, interest rates on government bonds increased.
The sovereign-bank doom loop in the Eurozone – the panic
Two types of vulnerabilities to debt crisis in the Eurozone.
1. 1 Private sector debt.
2. 2 Excess government deficits pre-GFC ⇒ sovereign debt crisis.
Private sector debt
» Banking crisis ⇒ fiscal crisis ⇒ sovereign debt crisis.
Evidence is Ireland and Spain when their house bubble burst even though fiscal position was good.
» Fiscal crisis ⇒ exacerbates banking crisis when banks hold lots of their government’s debt.
Possible governance solutions to the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis
- Supporters of a banking union: a banking union’s objective is to avoid banking crises and will provide arrangements for the resolution of failing banks.
o » To deal with the doom loop problem.
o » Single Resolution Mechanism - member countries are jointly responsible for bank solvency.
o » Ensures national governments remain intact. - Supporters of a fiscal union: objective is to have a central government to allow for automatic stabilisation of country specific shocks through automatic stabilisers.
» To provide adequate stabilisation at the supra-national level.
» To deal with the threat to the sovereign banking crises. - Economic and Political Union
The Eurozone crisis – policy steps – monetary policy
» ECB – massive injection of liquidity to support the banks.
» Draghi statement.
» But weak growth and fear of deflation.
» QE (2015 to 2020).
» A Eurozone banking union requires banking reform.
» Banking reform is needed whether or not there is banking union.
Break the doom loop by incentivising banks to diversify. Create a European deposit insurance system (supra national).
Why policy steps were ineffective in reducing public debt
- » Reform is required - some proposals that try to avoid a fiscal union. Create a euro-area fund to stabilise large shocks but with incentives to minimize drawing from it.
Create euro-bonds from a portfolio of national bonds as an alternative to national bonds
.
* » Fiscal union proposals go further: centralising fiscal policy with stabilising fiscal flows like a national government.
» EU recovery fund deal revives hopes for Eurozone banking union.
Current problems affecting the future of the eurozone
» Cyclical recovery - then stalled revealing underlying problems remain.
» Heterogeneity across countries.
Germany has fiscal space but is at high employment.
The countries that need to generate domestic demand such as Italy don’t have fiscal space (pro-cyclical rules).
» Over reliance on blunt and weak common instrument of monetary policy.