The English Legal System - Criminal Courts (Chapter 4) Flashcards
In criminal law, which are the courts of first instance and which are the appellate courts?
First instance
Magistrates’ Courts
Crown Courts
Appellate Courts
Crown Courts
High Court
Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
How are the judges at the Magistrates’ Court called?
Justices (lay magistrates) or District Judges
In terms of qualification, what is the difference between Justices and District Judges?
Justices are not legally qualified and will therefore be advised on points of law, practice and procedures by a legally qualified or experienced court clerk.
District Judges are properly qualified solicitors or barristers who sit as full-time or part-time judges at the Magistrates’ Court.
Finish this sentence
Justices are the tribunal of …
District Judges are the tribunal of … and …
Fact
Fact and law
How is a Magistrates’ Court composed?
Up to three Justices or District Judges
In Central London only, most cases will be heard by a single District Judge
Over what kind of offences does the Magistrates’ Court exercise jurisdiction over?
Summary criminal offences (Ordnungswidrigkeiten)
Offences triable only summarily may only be tried in the Magistrates’ Court. What does that mean?
The defendant does not have the right to be tried before a jury
What are the three types of criminal offences in UK law? What is considered a separate type?
1) Summary offences
2) Either way offences
3) Indictable only offences
4) Contempt of court
What are the three main differences between the types of offences in UK law?
Sentence period
Type of court
Authority
Type of court
Sentence period
Authority
For summary offences
Magistrates’ Court, if attached to another crime in either-way or indictable category it may, in limited circumstances, be dealt with in the Crowns Court
A summary offence normally carries a maximum sentence of 12 month’s imprisonment or a fine. The Magistrates’ Court can also give punishments such as a ban or community service.
Cases in the Magistrates’ Court are usually heard either by a District Judge sitting alone, or by a bench of three Magistrates (District Judges or Justices).
Type of court
Sentence period
Authority
For either way offences
An either way offence can be heard in either the Magistrates Court or the Crown Court. The range of offences within this category is very wide in terms of the level of seriousness. The main factor in deciding which court will deal with an either way offence is the likely sentence the defendant will face if found guilty.
The maximum sentence for an either-way offence dealt with by the Magistrate’s Court is 6 months. If the case is referred to the Crown Court the maximum penalty is whatever the maximum for that offence is by law.
Either way offences dealt with by the Magistrates’ Court will be decided by a District Judge sitting alone, or by a bench of three Magistrates (District Judges or Justices). Cases dealt with by the Crown Court will be decided by a judge and jury.
Type of court
Sentence period
Authority
For indictable only offences
Indictable only offences are the most serious category of criminal offence and can only be dealt with in the Crown Court.
As this is the most serious category of offence, the maximum sentences are long. Many indictable only offences carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
If the case proceeds to a trial, the jury will decide on the defendant’s innocence or guilt. It is always for the judge to pass sentence.
What power does the Magistrates’ Court have in deciding over cases when a person is charged with an either way offence?
A person charged with an either way offence must first appear before a Magistrates’ Court where they will be asked to submit their plea. The Magistrates’ Court will hear the facts of the case and decide where the case should be allocated for trial or sentence.
What decides if a either way offence will be tried before the Magistrates’ Court or the Crown Court?
The facts of the individual offence will determine how serious it is and hence whether the sentence will be within the powers of the Magistrates (a maximum of 6 months for a single either-way offence) or whether it will need to go to the Crown Court where higher penalties can be given.
In court, a judge may find an individual in contempt of court if they are?
- Disrespectful - insulting the judge, a court officer, lawyer or witness
- Disobedient - not complying with the lawful order of the court
- Disruptive - being rude or noisy in court
What are the punishments for Contempt of Court?
If someone is found in contempt of court, there are a few different punishments that can be handed down. The most common is a fine, which can range from a small amount to a maximum of £2,500. In some cases, especially if the person is unable to pay the fine, they may be sentenced to jail time for a maximum of 1 month in the magistrates’ court, or up to 2 years in the Appeal Court and Crown Court.
What is the difference between civil and criminal contempt of court?
Criminal contempt is a serious offence that can result in a jail sentence.
Civil contempt of court is conduct that is not a crime in itself, but is punishable by the court in order to ensure that its orders are observed.
What are examples of criminal contempt?
- Refusing to be sworn in as a witness
- Failing to answer questions during cross-examination
- Disrupting proceedings by making noise or speaking out of turn
- Interfering with witnesses or jurors
- Refusing to hand over evidence when ordered to do so by the court
- Threatening, assaulting or intimidating anyone involved in the court case such as lawyers, witnesses or jury members
- Publishing material that could prejudice a fair trial such as identifying jurors before they have retired to consider their verdict
What are examples of civil contempt?
- Failing to pay child support
- Not complying with a visitation schedule
- Not following the terms of a divorce decree
- Refusing to obey a court order to turn over property
- Violating the terms of a restraining order
What are the requirements for a either-way offence to be tried before the Magistrates’ Court?
They require the Magistrates’ Court to determine the mode of trial.
If the Magistrates decide that the summary trial is more suitable for the either-way offence, it also requires the defendant’s consent.
If the defendant does not consent, the case is sent to the Crown Court.
What is an Indictment?
The indictment is simply the document that contains the charge or charges faced by the defendant at trial in the Crown Court.
What is a trial on indictment?
A trial in the Crown Court is also known as ‘trial on indictment’ and offences which can or must be tried in the Crown Court are known as ‘indictable offences’.
What does the Magistrates’ Court base its decision on when imposing fines?
(1) Standard scale
(2) Severity of the offence
How many levels of offences are there? Does it have an effect on fines?
5 levels
1-4 certain limits on fines
5 no limit
The upper cap for level 5 offences has recently been lifted. Which law was responsible and how was the limit before?
Sentencing Act 2020
5000 GBP
What is the difference between conviction and sentence?
A conviction refers to the outcome of a criminal trial. It is the act of proving or declaring a person guilty of a crime. A sentence, on the other hand, is the formal declaration by a court imposing a punishment on the person convicted of a crime.
What are the three activities of the Crown Court?
1) Deals with the most serious offences that will be tried by judge and jury
2) Appeals from the Magistrates’ Court (dealt with by a judge and at least two Magistrates)
3) Convictions in the Magistrates’ Court that are referred to the Crown Court for sentencing
Why could it be favorable for a defendant to go to the Crown Court?
They can invoke the sympathy of the jury.
What is the trade-off between the Magistrates’ Court and the Crown Court for defendants?
The punishments in the Crown Court are more severe.
But the defendant can only invoke the sympathy of the jury in the Crown Court.
Jury and judge have different roles. Which are they?
Judge: Finding law
Jury: Finding facts
What are the judge’s tasks in the trial?
a) Describe the burden of proof
b) Sum up the evidence of both the prosecution and the defence
c) Define the law concerning the particular offence or offences
Can a judge express an opinion during the trial?
No, he can only comment on the evidence and point out implausibility or contradictions.
While the jury has retired in a case, what does the judge have to do?
He must be available to answer questions the jury might have. These questions need to be asked openly in court.
How can a judge acquit a case?
If he decides that in the LAW the prosecution’s evidence has failed make out a case against the defendant. He will direct the jury to acquit the case.
How are jurors selected for the jury?
Selected randomly in an electronic registry.
What are the criteria to be in the electronic registry for jurors?
What registries are there?
Age 18 to 75
Have lived in the UK for at least 5 years since age of 13
Parliamentary register
Local government register
What are reasons for exclusion from jury duty?
Sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years or more
Received prison sentence or community service in the previous 10 years
Placed on probation in the previous 5 years
Currently on bail in criminal proceedings
Persons lacking mental capability within the meaning of the Mental Capability Act 2005
Persons restricted under the Mental Health Act 1983
In the past, certain professions were exempt from jury duty. Which? Which law has repealed this exception?
Lawyers, judges, police officers, clergy
Criminal Justice Act 2003
What are three ways how the parties can challenge jurors?
1) Stand by for the crown (prosecutor)
2) Challenge for cause (prosecutor or defendant)
3) Challenge to the array (prosecutor or defendant)
What is “stand by for the crown”?
It’s a legal option for the prosecution to exclude a member of the jury. No reason need to be given.
However, the Attorney General announced in 1998 that this right would only be used to remove a juror considered to be “manifestly unsuitable” or to remove a juror in a terrorist or security trial where jury vetting has been authorized
What are the requirements for the defence or prosecution to “challenge for cause”?
Can be challenged for many reasons. It may occur when a juror is known to have made racially offensive remarks regarding a particular racial or ethnic category of the defendant.
However, it is not sufficient for a juror to be challenged just because of his race, religion, political beliefs or occupation.
The test for apparent bias is the “real danger” test described by Lord Goff in R vs Gough [1993] AC 646
What is the “real danger” test?
This test is used to used for apparent bias when challenge for a cause - a way to remove a juror from the jury based on bias.
It is described in Lord Goff in R vs Gough [1993] AC 646