The Demon Drummer of Tedworth case in more detail Flashcards

1
Q

When was the Demon Drummer of Tedworth case?

A

1662.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was Drury accused of?

A

Accused by the landowner of casting a spell over his house, having taken his drum, which he was banging to draw attention to himself for raising alms for poor- w/forged pass. House became attraction- visited by king’s representatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Joseph Glanvill do?

A

Investigated house, claimed there was evidence that Drury had cast a spell. As member of Royal Society, he encouraged them to explore the scientific foundations of witchcraft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happened in 1663?

A

Drury found guilty of theft + sentenced to deportation. Glanvill wrote disturbances stopped immediately, but Drury escaped deportation to Virginia by raising storms at sea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Details of Drury’s escape and acquittal

A

Escaped his ship but recaptured + tried in Salisbury where he was acquitted of witchcraft for 2nd time. Once again deported for theft. Disturbances began again, reportedly continued for several years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why was there scepticism about the case?

A

Webster claimed locals told him the case was fraudulent and Mompesson decided it was witchcraft due to locals’ influence. Bekker claimed the servants were responsible- causing noise to preserve their jobs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the impact of the case?

A

Continually revisited in 17th century + used as argument for sceptics. Numerous publications, involvement of Royal Society elevated notoriety of case, spread scepticism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How was the approach taken in the case significant?

A

Logical, empirical approach taken to case- sceptics investigated Mompesson, looked for other causes of disturbances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Did the case lead to any real change?

A

No, but it provoked debate on reality of supernatural- key members of intelligentsia involved- Glanville, Webster, VP of Royal Society, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How was the impact of the case limited?

A

Overall consensus at time was that supernatural forces were to blame- little disbelief in witchcraft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly