The Decline of Infectious Diseases Flashcards
Guha’s appraisal of the debate about the decline of infectious diseases and mortality decline?
- McKeown thesis weakened, but Szreter’s alternative thesis is also inadequate.
What was McKeown’s thesis and where did he publish it?
- the modern rise of population can be explained by a mortality decline commencing in the eighteenth century, this decline being ex- plicable, until at least 1900, mainly in terms of the improved living conditions and the better nutrition of the population
What was Szreter’s critique of McKeown’s work?
not only challenged the nutritional improvement hypothesis, but also developed an alternative explanation in- dicating that public health measures played a primary role in combating the early nineteenth-century upsurge of diseases resulting from the insanitary environment created in the course of industrialization
Szreter’s attach on the demographic underpinnings of McKeown’s work
- The 18th century decline in mortality was ‘within the bounds of previous pre-industrial fluctuations in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.’
- McKeown’s thesis ‘that there had been a single movement of continuous and uninterrupted mortality decline across the last three centuries, can no longer be considered valid’
Guha’s view of demgographic changes, and critique of szreter?
Wrigley and Schofield’s ‘The Population History of England’ charts a decline in mortality from 1740s.
If Public Health measures contributed to decline in mortality in mid 19th, what happened from 1740s to 1850s?
How did contemporaries view the improved morality rates in London in the late 18th and early 19th centuries?
- Dr Heberden, 1807:
- ‘cleanliness and ventilation’
- ## ‘variety of vegetables’ (nutrition)
Szreter’s attack on McKeown’s use of evidence, and Guha’s response
Szreter attacks the significance McKeown attached to airborne diseases (which, in their decline indicated the importance of nutrition). (Alternatively, a decline in water/food borne diseases would indicate the importance of public health and hygiene measures)
Guha: McKeown never juxtaposes the two groups of disease
McKeown on the decline in mortality
[t]he decline of mortality was due essentially to a reduction of deaths from infectious diseases
McKeown on the significance of public health intervention
The other major influence on the trend of the infections was reduction of exposure. As a primary influence, this was delayed until the second half of the nineteenth century, when men began to improve the quality of the environment. The initial advances were the purification of water, efficient disposal of sewage, and food hygiene, which together led to a rapid decline of intestinal diseases spread by water and food.
evidence on decline in cause of death in London
W. Farr 1881-1835: deaths by consumption per 100 000 fall from 1121 to 567
H. T. Bullstrode 1838-1851: TB falls 39.9 to 27.3
Guha on the fall in women’s mortality rates
since the exposure to TB was nearly universal in the late nineteenth century, the increased female resistance to this infection is more adequately explained by better nutrition than by any other cause.
Guha on the evidence needed to prove Szreter right
So mortality statistics—the final outcome of the struggle between man and micro-organism, are more adequate to prove McKeown’s case than they are for Szreter, who has the much harder task of demonstrating that it was a fall in exposure that was filtering through to the death rates and causing them to fall.
Guha on Szreter’s treatment of water borne diseases
The reduction in enteric fever mortality is almost certainly one of the triumphs of those local initiatives in water supply and sewage disposal eulogized by Szreter.
In the reports submitted to the Local Government Board, we frequently find reports of local inquiries into out- breaks of this disease accompanied by recommendations for sanitary improve- ments.
Indirect evidence of low exposure to typhoid in late-Victorian England is also supplied by the very high attack rates of this disease among British soldiers posted to India, where it was the leading cause of death in the 1890s
Guha on consensus between McKeown and Szreter, and persistent problems with both
McKeown and Szreter would seem to agree in attributing it to public health activities, and particularly to the improvement in water supply and sewage disposal.
But such an argument presumes that deaths were fewer because illnesses were fewer as a consequence of a reduction in exposure to infection; and this hypothesis is contradicted by the persistently high death rates below five, and especially below one
- resistance lower in young age?
Guha: conclusions
improvement cannot be explained by sanitary measures having prevented the encounter of human and micro-organism, but rather by a change in the outcome of that encounter. There was a shift, as Riley puts it ‘toward re- covery’. So, even as regards the food and water-borne infections public health measures cannot take all, or perhaps even most of the credit for the reduction in mortality.
it is most unlikely that the role of changes in real income, living standards and nutritional status will be found to be a minor one.