The Courts and Tribunals System Flashcards
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is the final appeal court for UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies. It is also the final appeal court for those Commonwealth countries which have retained the appeal to ‘His Majesty in Council’ or, in the case of those which are
republics, have retained appeal to the Judicial Committee. The purpose of the Judicial Committee is to advise the Crown, so in theory it never decides a case
but instead ‘humbly advises His Majesty’. In practice, however, the monarch never refuses the advice of the Judicial Committee.
The Judicial Committee hears both civil and criminal matters. It consists of senior members of the judiciary, usually from the Supreme Court (previously from the House of Lords). In addition, senior members of the judiciary from Commonwealth jurisdictions are members of the Judicial
Committee. The decisions of the Privy Council are not binding on the English courts, but its opinions can be highly persuasive. Some decisions are viewed as almost as authoritative as decisions of the House of Lords or the Supreme Court. This is because the Privy Council is made up of the same Justices that sit in the Supreme Court.
The Criminal Cases Review Commission
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is a statutory body responsible for reviewing alleged miscarriages of justice in the United Kingdom. It has power to send a case back to the Court of Appeal for review, if it considers there is a ‘real possibility’ that the Court of Appeal will overturn the conviction or sentence. If the decision to be reviewed was made in the Magistrates’ or Youth Court, the CCRC can send it
back to the Crown Court for review. This review takes the form of a re-hearing, in which all the evidence is heard again.
In order to refer a case for appeal, the Commission usually has to identify new evidence or a new legal argument that makes the case look significantly different. This evidence or argument must not have been considered at the time of the trial, at the initial appeal, or in an earlier application
to the Commission.
(There is an ‘exceptional circumstances’ caveat that allows the Commission to refer cases with no new evidence or argument, but such instances are extremely rare.)
Judges in the County Court
There are three levels of Judge in the County Court:
* Deputy District Judges (DDJs) are the most junior. They are often ‘fee paid’ ie paid a daily rate, rather than a salary.
* District Judges (DJs) are the next level up. Most judges in the County Court are District
Judges. They hear some final hearings, but the majority of their work is procedural.
* Circuit Judges (CJs) are the most senior. There are also Circuit Judges in the Crown Court (see your separate materials). The more complex cases in the County Court will be heard by a Circuit Judge. They will also hear appeals from decisions by DJs and DDJs.
Appeals from the County Court
An appeal against a decision by a Deputy District or District Judge will remain in the County Court to be decided by a Circuit Judge. The decision of a Circuit Judge can be appealed to the High Court, and subsequently to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) but only with permission. In principle, a decision of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) can be appealed to the Supreme Court, but only if it deals with a point of law of general public importance. See later materials on the Senior Courts for further details on appeals. Note too that the County Court does not create precedent. It is bound by the higher courts.
What are tribunals?
Tribunals are specialist judicial bodies dealing with administrative and regulatory cases. They do not have any jurisdiction in criminal matters. Cases may be started in a Tribunal or transferred between the County Court and the High Court, and tribunals (and vice versa). There are two Tribunal levels: the First-tier Tribunal, and the Upper Tribunal. The Upper Tribunal is a senior court and is equivalent to the High Court. The Upper Tribunal hears appeals from the
First Tier Tribunal. The current tribunals system was created by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, which consolidated the previous system.
First-tier Tribunal
There are seven first-tier tribunals, known as ‘chambers‘. The chambers in the First-tier Tribunal hear appeals from citizens against decisions made by government departments or agencies, although proceedings in the Property Chamber are on a private law basis, as are proceedings in
the Employment Tribunal.
* War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber
* Social Entitlement Chamber
* Health, Education and Social Care Chamber
* General Regulatory Chamber
* Tax Chamber
* Immigration and Asylum Chamber
* Property Chamber
The Employment Tribunal is also at ‘first tier’ level but is not a ‘Chamber’ of the First-tier Tribunal.
Upper Tribunal
There are four chambers in the Upper Tribunal, hearing appeals from the First Tier. The Employment Appeals Tribunal is at Upper Tribunal level but sits separately.
Administrative Appeals Chamber:
* War Pensions and Armed Forces
Compensation Chamber
* Social Entitlement Chamber
* Health, Education and Social Care
Chamber
* General Regulatory Chamber
Tax and Chancery Chamber:
* Tax Chamber
Immigration and Asylum Chamber:
* Immigration and Asylum Chamber (FTT)
Lands Chamber:
* Property Chamber
Senior President and judicial personnel
The Senior President of Tribunals is the independent and statutory leader of the tribunal judiciary. This office was established under the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. Just as the Lord Chief Justice heads the judiciary in England and Wales, the Senior President heads the tribunals judiciary, although his or her remit extends to Scotland and Northern Ireland depending on the jurisdiction concerned (Immigration and Asylum as well as Tax are UK-wide).
A Tribunal or Chamber President is responsible for the day-to-day judicial administration of their tribunal or (within the new simplified, two-tier structure) their Chamber. They act as a vital link between the Senior President of Tribunals, the judicial officers of their tribunal, and the senior judiciary outside the Tribunals Service. Tribunal judges are legally qualified and responsible for ensuring the individual tribunal hearings they chair make the correct decision in law. Tribunal members are the specialist non-legally qualified, ‘lay’ members of the panel hearing the case. Not every panel includes non-legal members.
Coroner’s Courts
Another important part of public decision-making takes places in Coroner’s Courts. Coroners investigate all deaths where the cause is unknown, or where there is reason to think it was not due to natural causes. Coroners’ investigations are called ‘inquests’.
Coroners will hear evidence from people involved in events leading up to the death of the deceased. Inquests are not as formal as court hearings, although the parties may be represented by lawyers and there may be examination of witnesses. Juries will be convened to decide the cause of death in some cases, notably when the deceased died in state custody.
Coroners do require legal experience, but they are not considered to be members of the judiciary. Coroners are barristers, solicitors or medical practitioners of not less than five years standing, who continue in their legal or medical practices when not sitting as coroners. A Coroner’s decision is called a ‘verdict’.
Public inquiries
Public inquiries are major investigations, convened by government departments, that are given special statutory powers to compel testimony and the release of other forms of evidence.
The only justification required for a public inquiry is the existence of ‘public concern’ about a particular event or set of events.
Public Inquiries have addressed topics as wide-ranging as transport accidents, fires, the mismanagement of pension funds, self-inflicted deaths in custody, outbreaks of disease, and decision-making that has led to war.
Notable recent inquiries include the public inquiry into the Grenfell disaster, the public inquiry into under-cover policing, and the public inquiry into the UK’s role in the Iraq War.
Town and Country planning decisions of public importance have long been made following public inquiries. These inquiries take place under separate legislation.
Inquiries happen when the local authority refuses planning permission for a development, and the developer appeals. Inquiries also take place into proposed local plans (plans which set out what kind of development is allowed where in a local area). Inquiries allow members of the public to appear as ‘third parties’ and challenge the evidence given by the local authority and the developer.
Inquiries Act 2005
If a public inquiry is held under this Act, the inquiry has:
* Legal safeguards and procedures.
* Statutory framework for appointment of a chair and other inquiry personnel, the taking of evidence, and production of a report and recommendations.
However, there is nothing to compel the government to act on the recommendations of a statutory
public inquiry.
What are the ‘senior courts’?
The senior courts of England and Wales are:
* The Supreme Court (before 1 October 2009, the House of Lords)
* The Court of Appeal
* The High Court
* The Crown Court (covered in your separate materials)
The structure and jurisdiction of the senior courts are set out in the Senior Courts Act 1981.
The High Court
The High Court is part of the Supreme Court of Judicature created by the Judicature Act 1873. (This followed the merging of the once separate common law and equity court systems.)
Judges of the High Court sit at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, and at number of regional centres outside London called District Registries.
The Administration of Justice Act 1970 re-structured the Court into three divisions:
* King’s Bench Division (KBD)
* Chancery Division
* Family Division
Judges in the High Court
High Court judges are nominally appointed by the monarch on the recommendation of the Lord Chancellor, after a fair and open competition administered by the Judicial Appointments Commission.
Candidates for appointment to the High Court must satisfy the judicial appointment eligibility condition on a seven-year basis or be Circuit Judges who have held office for at least two years.
2: The courts and tribunals system 33
High Court Judges are given the prefix ‘the Honourable’ and referred to verbally as ‘Mr/Mrs/Ms Justice [surname]’. This is abbreviated to: ‘[surname] J’ in writing.
In the High Court there are also procedural judges called Masters. At first instance they deal with all aspects of legal proceedings, from its issue until it is ready for trial by a trial judge – usually a High Court judge. After the trial, the Master resumes responsibility for completion of the case.
The Masters comprise: the Senior Master and nine King’s Bench Division masters; the Chief Master and five Chancery masters.
Regional locations
All the divisions of the High Court also have district registries or regional centres where High Court cases can be heard. As an example, the Administrative Court deals with the majority of its work at the Royal Courts of Justice in London but there are also regional centres in Cardiff, Bristol, Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester. (Collectively, these regional offices account for just over 20% of the overall work of
the Administrative Court.) Cases of real importance, often where the issue is of particular interest locally, are routinely heard in the courts outside London, ensuring litigants, public authorities and the wider community are able to see these matters being decided within their local area.