The Course of Evidence Flashcards
What is the role of a judge in a trial jury
- decide all questions concerning the admissibility of evidence
- explain and enforce the general principles of law applying to the point at issue
- instruct the jury on the rules of law by which the evidence is to be weighed once it has been submitted
What is the difference in oaths/affirmations for those 12yrs and over v those under 12yrs
- 12 or over - must take an oath or affirmation
- under 12 - must be informed by the judge of the importance of telling the truth and not telling lies, and must make a promise to tell the truth
Who may comment on the fact that the defendant did not give evidence at their trial
(right to silence)
- defendant
- defendant’s counsel
- judge
What is the purpose of evidence in chief
To elicit testimony that supports the case of the party calling the witness
What is the definition of a leading question
A question that directly or indirectly suggests a particular answer to the question
What are the three reasons why leading questions are generally not permitted
- .there is a natural tendency for people to AGREE with suggestions put to them by saying “yes” even if those suggestions do not precisely accord with their own view of what happened
- counsel asking leading questions of their own witnesses can more easily ELICIT the answers which they wish to receive, thereby reducing the spontaneity and genuineness of the testimony
- danger that leading questions will result in the MANIPULATION or CONSTRUCTION of the evidence through collusion, conscious or otherwise, between counsel and the witness
Leading questions must not be asked in evidence in chief or re-examination unless…..
- question relates to introductory or undisputed matters
- question is put with the consent of all other parties
- judge allows the question, in exercise of the judges discretions
In what circumstances is it likely that leading questions will be allowed by the judge in exercise of the judges discretion
- identification evidence
- assisting memory
- hostile witness
- young persons, english second language, limited intelligence
What must be done if a witness wishes to consult a document to refresh their memory while giving evidence in court
- leave of the judge must be obtained
- the document must be shown to every other party in the proceeding
- the document must have been made or adopted by a witness at a time when their memory was fresh
How may a witness refresh their memory out of court
Referencing statements which they may have made before. The requirement is that the document relates to matters which are within the witnesses own knowledge
When is a previous consistent statement is admissible
- responds to a challenge to the witness’s veracity or accuracy, based on a previous inconsistent statement of the witness or on a claim of recent invention on the part of the witness
- forms an integral part of the events before court
- consists of the mere fact that a complaint has been made in a criminal case
If an application is granted to declare a witness “hostile”, what questions can they be asked
- leading questions
- questions designed ato probe the accuracy of memory and perception
- questions at to prior inconsistent statements
- challenges to veracity, including evidence from other witnesses
What is the definition of a hostile witness
Means the witness:
- exhibits/appears to exhibit, a lack of veracity when giving evidence unfavourable to the party who called the witness on the matter about which the witness may reasonably be supposed to have knowledge
- gives evidence that is inconsistent with a statement made by that witness in a manner that exhibits, or appears to exhibit, an intention to be unhelpful to the party who called the witness
- refuses to answer questions or deliberately withholds evidence.
What are the two purposes of cross-examination
- elicit information supporting the case of the party conducting the cross-examination
- challenge the accuracy of the testimony given in evidence in chief
When is there a duty to cross examine
- the cross examination deals with significant matters in the proceeding
- the matters are relevant and in issue in the proceeding
- the matters contradict the evidence of the witness
- the witness may reasonably be expected to be in a position to give admissible evidence on those matters