The Course of Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

WHAT IS A JUDGES ROLE IN TRIAL BY JURY?

A
  • decide all questions concerning the admissibility of evidence
  • explain and enforce the general principles of law applying to the point at issue
  • instruct the jury on the rules of law by which the evidence is to be weighed once it has been submitted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS - AGE AND REQUIREMENTS

A

Witnesses who are 12 years of age or older must take an oath or affirmation before giving evidence (s77). Witnesses under the age of 12 must:

  • be informed by the judge of the importance of telling the truth and not telling lies and
  • make a promise to tell the truth, before giving evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCE IN CHIEF?

A

To elicit testimony that supports the case

of the party calling that witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DEFINE LEADING QUESTION

A

One that directly or indirectly suggests a particular answer to the question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

REASONS FOR FORBIDDING LEADING QUESTIONS

A
  • There is a natural tendency for people to agree with suggestions put to them by saying “yes”, even if those suggestions do not precisely accord with their own view of what happened.
  • Counsel asking leading questions of their own witnesses can more easily elicit the answers which they wish to receive, thereby reducing the spontaneity and genuineness of the testimony.
  • There is a danger that leading questions will result in the manipulation or construction of the evidence through collusion, conscious or otherwise, between counsel and the witness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RULES AROUND LEADING QUESTIONS

A

Leading questions may not be asked during evidence in chief or re-examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CIRCUMSTANCES LEADING QUESTIONS ARE PERMITTED - SECTION 89

A
  • the question relates to introductory or undisputed matters
  • the question is put with the consent of all other parties
  • the Judge, in exercise of the Judge’s discretion, allows the question.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

WHAT DOES SECTION 90(5) PROVIDE REGARDING REFRESHING MEMORY?

A

for the purposes of refreshing his or her memory while giving evidence, a witness may, with the prior leave of the judge, consult a document made or adopted at a time when his or her memory was fresh.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

WHEN IS A PREVIOUS CONSISTENT STATEMENT ADMISSIBLE?

A

If the statement:

  • responds to a challenge that will be or has been made to the witness’s veracity or accuracy, based on a previous inconsistent statement of the witness or on a claim of invention on the part of the witness
  • forms an integral part of the events before the court
  • consists of the mere fact that a complaint has been made in a criminal case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

O/C CASE - GIVING EVIDENCE

A
  • Take care that you actually answer the question being asked.
  • Say you do not know, rather than guess.
  • Do not be flippant.
  • Address the judge as “Your Honour“ or “Sir/Ma’am”.
  • Address the prosecutor and defence as “Sir/Ma’am”.
  • Advise the judge of any mistakes you have made as soon as possible, or advise the prosecutor, if you have finished giving evidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WHEN IS A WITNESS DEEMED TO BE HOSTILE ?

A
  • Displays active hostility
  • Refusing to answer questions or withholds information

Leave is sought to declare as hostile witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

WHAT QUESTIONS CAN BE ASKED TO A HOSTILE WITNESS?

A
  • leading questions
  • questions designed to probe the accuracy of memory and perception
  • questions as to prior inconsistent statements
  • other challenges to veracity, including evidence from other witnesses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DEFINE HOSTILE WITNESS

A

Section 4 - Evidence Act 2006

means the witness
- exhibits, or appears to exhibit, a lack of veracity when giving evidence unfavourable to the party who called the witness on a matter about which the witness may reasonably be supposed to have knowledge; or

  • gives evidence that is inconsistent with a statement made by that witness in a manner that exhibits, or appears to exhibit, an intention to be unhelpful to the party who called the witness; or
  • refuses to answer questions or deliberately withholds evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

WHEN DOES THE DUTY TO CROSS EXAMINE ARISE?

A
  • the cross-examination deals with “significant matters” in the proceeding
  • the matters are “relevant” and “in issue” in the proceeding,
  • the matters “contradict the evidence of the witness”
  • The witness may “reasonably be expected to be in a position to give admissible evidence on those matters”.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

SECTION 85 - UNACCEPTABLE QUESTIONS

A

Questions that are:

  • improper
  • unfair
  • misleading
  • needlessly repetitive
  • expressed in language that is too complicated for the witness to understand
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

WHAT MAY THE JUDGE TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FOR DISCRETION FOR AN UNAACEPTABLE QUESTION?

A
  • the age or maturity of the witness
  • any physical, intellectual, psychological, or psychiatric impairment of the witness
  • the linguistic or cultural background or religious beliefs of the witness
  • the nature of the proceeding; and
  • in the case of a hypothetical question, whether the hypothesis has been or will be proved by other evidence in the proceeding.
17
Q

Sequence of jury trials ( 8 points)

A
  • jury is empanelled an foreperson selected
  • prosecution gives their opening address
  • prosecution case is presented
  • defence give their opening address
  • the defence case is presented
  • prosecution make their closing statement
  • defence make their closing statement
  • judge sums up
  • jury retires to decide the verdict