The Course of Evidence Flashcards
Essential features of the adversarial justice system:
- the facts of the case, and relevant evidence, emerge by questions
- each party decides what witness to call, the order, and the questions put to them
- each party has the right to test a testimony through cross-examination
- the judge’s function is to ensure the evidence is produced according to the rules
- neither the judge or jury is entitled to pursue enquiries of their own
- judge should only ask questions when requires
- the defendant does not have to give evidence
- facts may be judicially noticed when known, accepted, and cannot reasonably be questioned.
Sequence of jury trials?
- jury empanelled, foreperson selected, judge gives opening instructions
- crown provides opening address including detailed explanation of the charges and summary of the case
- the case for the crown is presented
- defence opens its case by making an open address to the jury
- defence presents case
- crown concludes by making a closing address
- defence makes closing address to the jury
- the judge summarises before the jury retires to consider its verdict.
Commenting on a defendants right of silence
In a criminal proceeding, no person other than the defendants counsel or the judge may comment on the fact that the defendant did not give evidence at trial
s32 of the Evidence Act:
provides that no person may invite the fact-finder to draw an inference that the defendant is guilty from a failure to answer questions, respond to statements, or disclose a defence before trial. The judge must direct the jury that it may not draw an inference of guilt from the failure.
What is the purpose of evidence in chief?
to elicit testimony that supports the case on the party calling that witness
given orally after witness has taken oath or affirmation
may be given in written form if both parties consent
What is a leading question?
One that directly or indirectly suggests a particular answer to a question
Three reasons for the prohibition of leading questions?
- there is a natural tendency for people to agree with suggestions put to them, even if they do not precisely accord with their own view
- counsel asking leading questions of their own witnesses can more easily elicit the answers they wish to receive, thereby reducing the spontaneity and genuineness of the testimony
- danger that leading questions will result in the manipulation of construction of the evidence through collusion
In what circumstances may a leading question be allowed?
- to direct a witnesses attention to the subject of identification evidence
- to jog a witnesses memory
- to assist in eliciting evidence in chief of very young people, have limited english, or have limited intelligence
- where the witness as been declared hostile.
If a witness wants to refresh memory by consulting a document, what conditions must be satisfied?
- the leave of the judge must be obtained
- document must be shown to every other party in the proceeding
- document must have been “made or adopted” by the witness “at a time when his or her memory was fresh”.
Previous consistent statements
Are generally inadmissable, because the mere repetition of an allegation does not increase its truthfulness.
Prevents the parties from inundating the courts with voluminous amounts of repetitive material
Three exceptions to previous consistent statements rule
- the statement responds to a challenge made on the witnesses veracity or accuracy
- the statement forms an integral part of the events before the court
- the statement consists of the mere fact that a complaint has been made in a criminal case.
Definition of hostile witness (as per s4):
a hostile witness means the witness:
- exhibits or appears to exhibit a lack of veracity when giving evidence, or
- gives evidence that is inconsistent with a statement made by that witness in a manner that exhibits, or appears to exhibit, an intention to be unhelpful
- refuses to answer any questions or deliberately withholds evidence.
If a judge declares a witness hostile, what types of questions may now be asked?
- ask leading questions
- ask questions designed to probe accuracy of memory and perception
- challenge veracity, including evidence from other witnesses (provided it is “substantially helpful”
What are the two purposes of cross-examination?
- to elicit information supporting the case of the party conducting the cross-examination
- to challenge the accuracy of the testimony given in evidence-in-chief
Who has the right to cross-examine?
All parties, other than the one calling the witness