The Cosmological Argument Flashcards
Inductive argument
Aims to build a case which leads us to a conclusion, it aims to persuade us the conclusion is reasonable not prove it to us.
The book Thomas of Aquinas put forward his five ways in
The Summa Theologica
way 1
Aquinas’ First way or the argument from motion
Way 2
Aquinas’ second way or the argument from causation
Aquinas’ third way
The argument from contingency
Explain the argument from causation
- everything in the world has a cause
- nothing is the cause of itself
- there cannot be an infinite regress of causes
- therefore there has to be a first cause to start the chain if causes
- this first cause we call God
Explain the argument from contingency
- everything in the world is contingent (can either exist or not exist)
- if things cannot exist there must be a time when they didn’t exist
- if everything in the world cannon exist there must have been a time when nothings existed
- things exist now so there must be something which we all depend on which brought us into existence
- this must be a necessary being which all other contingent beings came from
- this necessary being we call God
Explain the argument from motion
- everything in the world is moving or changing
- nothing can move or change by itself
- there cannot be an infinite regress of things changing other things
- there must be a prime mover
- this is called God
Thomas of Aquinas
13th century philosopher
Explain Hume’s first criticism
To move from “everything in the universe is contingent” to “the universe itself must be contingent” isn’t logical and is too big a leap for logic
Explain Hume’s second criticism
Why must there be a prime mover? Could there not be many Gods working on a committee of gods? Why must the prime mover be identified with the Christian concept of God?
Explain Hume’s third criticism
Just because everything in our world is governed by cause and effect it doesn’t mean the universe had to have a cause. Couldn’t the universe be infinite?
Explain How Hume challenge the idea of cause and effect
We perceive causation might just be a statistical conjunction. If a person goes up to someone and pushes them over. We see the first person going and pushing someone, and the second person falling over. Because we have seen this before we interpret the action to be the effect of pushing someone is to cause another person to fall over.
How did Copleston reformulate Aquinas’ argument
Concentrated on the argument for contingency
What was Coplestons argument for contingency?
- There are things in this world that are contingent-they might not have existed
- all things in the world are like this: everything depends on something else for it’s existence
- therefore there must be a cause of everything in the universe which exist outside the universe
- this cause must be a necessary being: one which contains reason for existence wishing itself
- this necessary being is God