The basic principles of neuropharmacology Flashcards
Ligand
Any chemical that binds to/combines with a receptor
Receptor
A cellular macromolecule/assembly of macromolecules concerned directly and specifically in chemical signalling between cells
Binding of ligands to receptors 1
Active process, happens due to alignment of 3D shape and biophysical properties (forces) between the ligand and binding site of the receptor
Binding of ligands to receptors 2
Multiple points of interaction may be needed within a binding site for binding to occur
Hydrophobic and hydrophilic charge sites
Van der waal, electrostatic and covalent
Binding of one part of the molecule can facilitate/prevent the binding of another part (e.g through shape change)
Endogenous ligands
Ligands produces naturally by the body e.g neurotransmitters
Exogenous ligands
Endogenous ligands that are synthesised in the lab or modified to change their properties
Specific binding
Calculated as the difference between total and nonspecific binding and reflects the amount of radiogland bound to a specific binding site
Non-specific binding
Represents the nonsaturable portion of binding that is presumably not associated with specific binding under investigation
Total binding
The amount of binding observed
Comprised of 2 components:
1. Specific binding (saturable)
2. Nonspecific binding
Quantification of radioligand binding
When a ligand is at equilibrium with the receptors, it is quantified according to:
1. The affinity of the biding, which is expressed as a dissociation constant (Kd)
2. The amount of binding (Bmax)
Agonists
Evoke (produce) effects in biological tissue
- they can be full, partial of inverse
Antagonists
Do not have effects on their own biological tissue but can block effects evoked by agonists
- thus their effect is to antagonise the action of an agonist
- can be competitive and non-competitive
When plotting quantification of agonist effect, which graph is preferred? Why?
The logarithmic plot is preferred for visualising concentration response relationships as it becomes easier to accurately determine the potency of the ligand
Partial agonist
When it binds to a receptor it elicits only a small response because it lacks a portion of the molecule enquires for the full physiological effect/it binds to a slightly diffferent sight on the receptor
- whilst being less efficacious, they can be more potent than a full agonist
Partial vs. Full agonist
- in the presence of a full agonist a partial agonist will act as a functional agonist, competing with the full agonists for the same receptor
- this reduces the ability of the full agonist to produce its maximal effect