The Bank-Customer Relationship Flashcards
What Regimes of Law govern the Bank-Customer Relationship?
A contractual debtor-creditor relationship,* which is governed by statute and, under minor exceptions, equity.
Foley v Hill (1848) 2 HLC 28.
What is the Bank’s Mandate?
The authority for the Bank to act in particular way, as derives from its contract with the Customer. Ultra Vires acts are not binding on the Customer.
When does the Bank-Customer Relationship begin?
When the Bank agrees to open an account for the Customer,* which it shall do on the Customer’s instruction.**
Ladbroke v Todd [1914] 30 TLR 433; Woods v Martins Bank [1958] 3 All ER 166
The FCA’s Banking Conduct of Business and the Lending Code suggest proper conduct be owed even to non-accountholders, as well as impose further duties alongside FSMA 2000 and other legislations.
Do Customers have a Right to a Bank Account?
Yes.
The Payment Accounts Regulations 2015.
Once deposited, does the Customer’s money continue to belong to him?
No. At that point, the Bank owns the money, and the Customer only possesses a claim against the Bank for the relevant sum.
Foley v Hill (1848) 2 HLC 28.
Is the Money deposited in a Bank subject to a Trust in favor of the Customer?
No.
Joachimson v SBC [1921] 3 KB 110.
In Retail Banking, what Services does the Bank provide the Customer?
Primarily, Banks provide Customers with:
- Current and Savings Accounts;
- Credit;
- Investment advice; and
- Proprietary trading services.
More sophisticated customers may have access to the Bank’s fee-earning businesses, i.e. M&A, IPOs, Underwriting, etc.
Under its Contract with the Customer, what are the Bank’s Core Obligations to the Customer?
To honor payments and repay credited sums, naturally under the relevant terms and conditions.
What happens if a Bank Dishonors a Payment without Just Reason?
It is liable to pay damages for breach of contract,* and potentially for defamation,** although this is harder.
*Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 AER 119; **Jayson v Midland Bank [1968] 1 WLR 956
Damages may be nominal or substantive, depending on the case.
When will a bank be taken to have Just Reason for Dishonoring a Payment?
If the Customer:
- Is Dead.
- Gives ambiguous instructions.
- Lacks funds or access to overdraft.
- Countermands a set of earlier instructions.
- Delivers out-of-date payment instructions (6 months).
- Account subject to a Third Party Debt Order or Freezing Order.
- Has petitioned for bankruptcy, insolvency, or voluntary liquidation (§127 – IA 1986).
- Gives the Bank reasonable grounds to believe the instructions are without authority, i.e. fraudulent.*
- Is under suspicion for a possible crime and would therefore cause the Bank to breach §328 POCA 2002.
*Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale [1991] 2 AC 548
Does the Bank owe the Customer a Duty of Care?
Yes, both in contract* and in tort.** It must foremost strictly adhere to the Customer’s Mandate, amongst other things.
*CRA 2015 – §49; **Henderson v Merrett [1994] UKHL 5.
The Bank-Customer relationship is an Agent-Principal relationship. The FCA Principles impose further duties on the Bank.
Does the Customer owe the Bank a Duty of Care?
Yes. It must foremost issue clear and unambiguous instructions* and inform the bank of real or potential fraudulent activity on its account(s), amongst other things.
*Midland Bank v Seymour [1955] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 147
Is the Bank the Customer’s Fiduciary?
Almost certainly not.* Only when the Bank assumes a duty of trust, confidence, and loyalty to the Customer will it become a Fiduciary.**
*Wright v HSBC [2006] EWHC 1473; **Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] EWCA Civ 533.
Material to demonstrating a Fiduciary Duty is mutual understanding of a relinquishment of self-interest or the exercise of unilateral powers which can expose another to vulnerability.
What are the Three Tests for Ascertaining the Existence of a Fiduciary Duty of Care?
Evincing:
- A mutual understanding of a relinquishment of self-interest and promise to act only on behalf of another;
- The exercise of unilateral powers which can expose another to vulnerability; or
- The provision of advice in a confidential relationship which, when relied upon, results in the Defendant realizing some gain.
Scavarelli v Bank of Montreal [2004] OTC. 36 (SC), utilized in Lloyds v Bundy [1975] EWCA 8.
It is critical to emphasize the abnormality of cases like Bundy.
Can a Fiduciary Duty arise when a Bank provies a Customer with Investment Advice?
Extremely exceptionally.
Woods v Martins Bank [1959] 1 QB 55; Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Smith [1991] FCA 481.
Frankly, unless such an Arrangement was specifically requested by the Customer and sanctioned by the Bank, then there’s virtually no chance.
Do Banks generally owe a Duty of Care to advise on the Merits of a Transaction?
No, but if one is assumed, it must be carried out with reasonable care and skill.”
Thornbridge Ltd. v Barclays Bank [2015] EWHC 3430, referencing Hedley Byrne.
Is the mere Giving of Advice sufficient to give rise to an Advisory Duty of Care?
No. The Bank must go beyond the, “normal recommendations…given in the daily interactions,” between it and its Customers, and speak of a particular product or service on offer, not just generally.
Thornbridge Ltd. v Barclays Bank [2015] EWHC 3430.
How does the FCA distinguished between Advice and Information?
Advice, “requires an element of opinion,” on the Advisor’s part, whereas Information, “involves statements of fact or figures.”
FCA PERG – 8.28.1G
“In general terms, simply giving information without making any comment or value judgment on its relevance to decisions which an investor may make is not advice.”
FCA PERG – 8.28.2G.
Can the Bank contractually Disclaim a Fiduciary Duty?
Yes.
Henderson v Merrett [1994] UKHL 5; IFE v Goldman Sachs [2006] EWHC 2887 (Comm).
When should a Banker act upon a Suspicion of Fraud?
“[When] a reasonable and honest Banker, aware of the facts, would have concluded that there was a serious or real possibility, albeit not a probability, that its customer was being defrauded.”
Selangor Rubber v Craddock (No 3) [1968] 1 WLR 1555.
Does the Bank have a Duty to Explain the Nature and Effect of a Security to a Customer?
Yes.
Cornish v Midland Bank [1985] 3 All ER.
What are a Bank’s potential Liabilities in Tort?
See Legal Aspects: Syndicated Lending.
Does a Bank owe a Duty of Care when providing Investment Advice?
Yes,* although not if the investment was independently appraised and the Customer relied thereon.**
*Woods v Martins Bank [1958] 3 All ER 166; **Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society [1999] UKHL 28.
Having assumed an Advisory Duty, what denotes the Bank’s Duty of Care?
An obligation to act with the skill and care to be expected of a reasonably competent financial adviser,* with reference to the extent of responsibility assumed by the Bank.**
*Matrix Securities v Theodore Goddard [1998] PNLR 290; **Property Alliance Group v RBS [2018] EWCA Civ 355
Therefore, the boundaries of any given advisory duty may vary greatly based on the circumstances.