The Arab Israeli Conflict Flashcards

1
Q

Long Term Causes of 1948 War

A

– Zionism
– International Relations
– Anti-Semitism
– Arab Rejectionism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Short Term Causes of 1948 War

A

– Arab armies attacked along the borders of the Jewish State
o Response to UN 181 – Partition of Palestine
o Declaration of Independence by Israel
– Jews willing to defend the State of Israel (even under the partition guidelines) and Arabs willing to defend the whole of western Palestine as their independent state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Consequences of 1948 War

A

Ramifications for Jews outside of Palestine

Palestinian Refugees

Armistice not Peace

–	There were also irreconcilable goals of both parties
o	Existence of Israel
o	Border issues
o	Refugees
o	Jerusalem
o	Access to water
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Consequences for the War for Israel and Palestine to 1967

A
  • Refugees
  • Nationalsim
  • Ongoing conflict (Suez Crisis)
  • Fedayeen Raids
  • Unresolved Issues (Border Issues, Refugees & right of return, Water, Jerusalem)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Political and Social Issues in Arab-Israeli Relations in 1967

A
  • Right of return or compensation for Palestinian refugees
  • The burdens on the new state of Israel
  • Support and involvement by international players
  • Superpowers sphere of influence
  • The Palestinians and the Arab World
  • Pan-Arabism and its consequences
  • Israel under threat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Long term causes of 1967 War

A

• Water disputes and formation of United Arab Command
• Border raids based in Syria, Egypt + Jordan = counter raids
• Egypt economic problemsEgypt mobilises army because the Soviets fed information into Egypt, that Israel was mobilising on the Syrian border, and Egypt had a pact with Syria. (Legitimate excuse they had been waiting for to mobilise)
• Soviet also told Syria and the US. All surveillance suggested the Soviets were wrong
- IN MIDST OF COLD WAR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Creation of PLO

A

• By Nasser in 1964, to control the Fedayeen groups, as he didn’t want Egypt dragged into another war
• He wanted to take Palestinian nationalism and use for Pan-Arab purposes
• Functioned as an umbrella organisation, working from diverse smaller groups
• Was set up with the help of the Arab League, and funded by Arab countries
• 1967 was impetus for change → Growth in Palestinian nationalism, as Arab states could not solve the Palestinian problem – own self interest
o Focused on Statehood aspirations
o Leadership change from Nasser to Arafat in 1969

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Aims of PLO

A
  • Liberate Palestine from Zionist ‘colonial oppressors’

* Use a method of armed struggle to create an independent state → do this through the destruction of Israel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Methods pre–1967 of PLO

A

• Conquer Israel through a untied Arab front and through force → traditional military methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Methods post–1967 of PLO

A

Terrorism

o Change in methods intrinsically linked to their power → terrorism is the ‘weapon of the weak’ (Robert Goodin)
o No viable alternatives → indication of their desperation and hopelessness of the situation
o Results → elevated conflict from a regional to international level, gave the Palestinians a tool for negotiations, and made the ‘Palestinian problem’ and international problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Method post-1974 of PLO

A

• The international attention of the Palestinian cause as a result of terrorism tactics saw the apparent turn to diplomacy, especially through Yasser Arafat
• Apparent strategy changes
o Opportunities for diplomacy
o 1974 Phases Plan → opportunity for any land would be taken, even if it involved negotiating with Israel.
o Moving away from Arab rejectionism (still didn’t accept Resolutions 181, 242, 338)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Effectiveness of PLO 1964-1967

A

o Ineffective → dominated by Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia
o Most guerilla operations were conducted by the Fatah, and though large, it was not coordinated with other groups and not largely effective → posed real but limited threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Effectiveness of PLO 1968-1974

A

o Effective → Fatah and Arafat emerged as legitimate leadership, Formed under Palestinian Nationalism → unified goal, represented themselves
o Terrorism put the Palestinian problem on the international stage.
• Granted recognition in the Arab League in 1974
• 1974, Arafat was the first leader of a national movement to address the UN General Assembly, that lead to the granting of the PLO as an UN observer status
• 1975, General Assembly invited the PLI to participate in debates concerning the Arab-Israeli conflict
• 1975, US State department acknowledged the ‘legitimate interests of the Palestinian Arabs’ must be taken into consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Long Term Causes of 1973 War

A

o Egypt’s desire to regain lost territory, military honour and to defeat Israel, particularly after the fiasco of the 1967 war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Course of 1967 War

A
  • Independence Day, Egypt Mobilised (Soviets fed information of Israeli mobilisation)
  • Rumour spread, removed UNEF, Israel mobilised (stop entire country)
  • Driven by fear and pragmatism - pre-emptive strike
  • Egyptian air forces bombed and destroyed within 30 minutes, Israel could focus on Sy & Jor
    6 days, 2000 Eg died fighting, 10000 in retreat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Short Term Causes of 1973 War

A

o Change in the Egyptian president
o Egyptian and Syrian preparations → large number of troops trained, Sadat sought assistance from the Soviets who supplied Egypt and Syria with large quantities of Military assistance
o Failure of Israeli military intelligence
• Military and intelligence hubris → continuing build up of Egyptian troops on the border → not taken seriously as attacks never came
• Between 1972-73, Egyptians/Syrians mobilised 22 times & Israel had to decide whether to mobilise, knowing that their economy would stagnate

16
Q

Consequences of 1967 War

A

Israel - WIN, hubristic, important territory, clear borders, US ally, increase in P under I rule
Annex of Jerusalem
Growth of Palestinian nationalism
PLO
International Relations - UN Resolution 242
Arab Rejectionism

17
Q

Course of 1973

A

23rd Mobilisation - Israel didn’t mobilise (Ramadan)
Eg (smaller objective war - told Sy) Sy (wanted destruction of Israel)
Israel not prepared, initial substantial losses - Arab SUCCESS, (almost got Golan Heights)
Israel called for armistice, Arab refused, got excited, continued fighting, drove Syria out of Golan Heights, claimed back Sinai & got troops on Eg side of Suez Canal
US & Soviets called UN Resolution 338 - ceasefire, accepted by Eg, Sy, Is

18
Q

Consequences of 1973 War

A

High Human Cost
Military Victory for Israel, Political victory for Arabs
Israel realisation for need for peace
Oil became a new weapons - oil embargo during 10 days of war (if country supported Israel)
Continued US support for Israel
PLO recognised as sole representatives of Palestinians by Arab League
UNEF on Egyptian front and UN truce observers on Syrian front -
Egypt guaranteed Israeli shipping safety in Suez, Israel retreated from the Sinai
Shuttle Diplomacy - Sinai Disengagement 1, 2 & 3
Camp David Accords I & II

19
Q

Camp David Accords I & 2

A

1979 Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty in 1979
- Visited Knesset - ‘durable and just’ peace with Israel, wanted pre-1967 borders, & Palestinian statehood. Is Returned Sinai
- Egypt needed to focus on internal problems e.g. economy & population, wanted resources from war to go into reconstruction and widening of Suez Canal and free Eg from Soviet influence, recovery of territory and honour
- Israel achieved peace with their perceived ‘biggest threat’ at little-to-no cost - Sinai was always negotiable. Sinai was now neutralised and patrolled by foreign troops
- US gave huge economy and military aid (Is $3b, Eg $2b of financial/military assistance) (not including foreign aid allocations)
- West hailed Sadat a hero, Arab states called him traitor - PLO rejected accords, Arab league imposed sanctions, & suspended, expelled from other Arab institutions
SIGNIFICANT - first Arab country to recognise/sign peace treaty with Is, end of Pan-Arab nationalism, framework for peace

20
Q

Shortcomings for Camp David Accords I & II

A

Disagreements immediately over exact agreements,
Begin began settlements (after 3 months) saying the accords allowed him to
Knesset proclaimed Jerusalem was capital
Israel annexed the Golan Heights (1981) (1967 territory)
Major issued unresolved
Only first accord was implemented
Consequences – leads to 1982 lebanon invasion, increased Arab suspicion of Israel & other Arab states, refused to be drawn into peace process, and Israel hardened attitude towards Arabs,
1981, Sadat assassinated by Islamic Jihad
Accord II, though not implemented, provided a legal framework for Pa self-determination in WB & Gaza

21
Q

Role & objectives of Superpowers in relation to events in the Middle East

A

Part of the broader Cold War conflict
Significance of Middle East
USA - driven by concerns for global supremacy and economic considerations
USSR - supplier of arms, wanted to maintain their hegemony among Arab countries

22
Q

Avi Shlaim argues what?

A

that Likud is driven by ideology and Labour is rooted by security. By trying to establish land for people, they are trying to secure people. Likud is actually focused on the ideological aspirations for Israel

23
Q

Attitudes & Policies of Labour

A

Attitudes: LEFT WING - supported by European Jews
Policies: Supported ‘Land for Peace’
- Willing to withdraw from WB & Gaza in exchange for peace with Palestinains
- Did endorse settlements in OT but only after they lost so many seats in 1974, and not to the extent of Likud

24
Q

Attitudes and policies of Likud

A

Attitudes: RIGHT WING - supported by the 2nd tier in society, the Middle Eastern Jews
Policies: Opposed the return of territory and policies emphasised the security & establishing settlements
- Greatly increased settlements in the OT

25
Q

Rise and Significance of Israeli settler movement in the OT

A
Creeping annexation/facts on the ground
Growth under Likud Government
Conflict
Impact on the lives of Palestinians
Biblical/Greater Israel
Entanglement and cantonisation (aka. Bantustans --> little areas, divided from each other)
Problems for Israel