The 14th Amendment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the rule from the Slaughter-House Cases (1873)?

A

The Privileges or Immunities clause only affords protection against the Federal Government, not any state government.

NOT GOOD LAW.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the rule from Saenz v. Roe (1999)?

A

A state violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause by limiting welfare benefits based on a person’s status as a new resident.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the rule from Brown v. Mississippi (1936)?

A

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that state action be consistent with fundamental principles of liberty and justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the rule from Twining v. New Jersey (1908)?

A

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that state action be consistent with fundamental principles of liberty and justice.

NOT GOOD LAW.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the rule from Palko v. Connecticut (1937)?

A

A state law allowing the prosecution to appeal the results of a criminal conviction by jury trial does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

NOT GOOD LAW.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the rule of Duncan v. Louisiana (1968)?

A

The Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial applies to state court proceedings through the Fourteenth Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the rule of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)?

A

Subject to certain safety limitations, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution creates an individual right to keep and bear arms apart from any military purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the two prongs of incorporation?

A

1) A moral prong

2) A historical prong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the three prongs of the Due Process Clause?

A

1) Life

2) Liberty

3) Property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can the state provide greater protections than required by the Federal Constitution?

A

Yes, the Federal Constitution sets a floor of behavior, not a ceiling.

Exception: If the increased protections would infringe on another protected right, that would be impermissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the Lochner era?

A

The Lochner era was a period of time where the Supreme Court was highly protective of economic freedoms through the Due Process clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When did the Lochner era end?

A

The Lochner era ended at roughly the same time the Laissez Faire approach to the Commerce Clause ended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the rule of Allgeyer v. State of Louisiana?

A

The freedoms protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment include economic freedoms and prohibit a state from preventing its citizens from contracting with foreign insurance companies to insure property located within the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the rule of Lochner v. New York (1905)?

A

A state may not regulate the working hours mutually agreed upon by employers and employees as this violates their Fourteenth Amendment right to contract freely under the Due Process Clause.

THIS IS NOT GOOD LAW.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the rule of Nebbia v. New York (1934)?

A

Without the presence of other constitutional prohibitions, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not prevent states from enacting economic policies such as price regulations to further the public good as long as those policies are not unreasonable or arbitrary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the rule of West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937)?

A

A state may regulate the minimum wage paid to female employees when that regulation is for the purpose of promoting employees’ health, safety and general welfare.

17
Q

What is the rule of United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938)?

A

Congressional legislation of common commercial products will be scrutinized under a rational-basis test.

18
Q

What is the rule of Williamson v. Lee Optical Co. (1955)?

A

A state may regulate a business if its legislature determines there is a particular health and safety problem at hand and that the regulation in question is a rational way to correct the problem.

19
Q

What is the rule of Meyer v. Nebraska (1923)?

A

A state may not prohibit the teaching of foreign languages to a young child in school when such teaching has been requested by the child’s parent because this interferes with the fundamental liberty interest of a parent to control his or her child’s education.

20
Q

What is the rule of Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)?

A

Requiring children to be educated only by public instruction violates the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

21
Q

What is the rule from Prince v. Massachusetts (1944)?

A

“Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it does not follow they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can make that choice for themselves.”

22
Q

What is the rule from Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)?

A

An implied “right of privacy” exists within the Bill of Rights that prohibits a state from preventing married couples from using contraception.

23
Q

What is the rule from Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972)?

A

Under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a state may not outlaw distribution of contraception to unmarried persons.

24
Q

What is a rational basis test?

A

“[If] a challenged state action [does not] implicate a fundamental right [it will be upheld if it has] a reasonable relation to a legitimate state interest…”

-Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).

25
Q

What is a strict scrutiny test?

A

“[S]ubstantive due process…forbids the government to infringe certain ‘fundamental’ [rights] unless the infringement is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest.”

-Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993).