Textbook/Readings Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

evidence-based treatment

A

therapies based on research & supported by research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

empiricism

A

using evidence from the senses (or instruments that assist senses) as the basis for conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

weight of the evidence

A

collection of studies (& replications) of the same theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

falsifiability

A

a hypothesis that, when tested, could fail to support the theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

probabalistic

A

findings don’t explain all cases all of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

average inter-item correlation (AIC)

A

average of all correlations

all calculated for each item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

cronbach’s alpha

A

combines AIC & number of items in scale

closer to 1.0 => better reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lamm et al. (2018) study 1 results

A

Success=> 69.7% Nso vs. 28% German
Tasted/Ate=> 28.9% Nso vs. 49.6% German
Avg delay times=> 7.73 min Nso vs. 4.56 min German

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Brown & Greenfield (2021) results

A

Communication Changes
-79% reported change in at least 1 form with family & 76% with friends
-Moreso women than men (76% vs. 69.6%; 79.6% vs. 64%)

Communcation & Well-Being
-Increase in communication with family/friends => Increased life satisfaction & positive emotions
-Increased with friends associated with life satisfaction (but not with family)

Age & Communication Shifts
-Younger age associated with video communication
-No age association with phone calls/texts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

possible patterns of results for cross-lag measures:

A
  1. Early x with later y
  2. Early y with later x
  3. Both true
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

using Beta

A

-One for each predictor variable
-Positive => Positive correlation btwn predictor & outcome
-Negative => Negative correlation ^^
-Regression doesn’t = causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

parsimony

A

degree to which a scientific theory provides the simplest explanation of some phenomenon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lamm et al. (2018) study 2 results

A

-alpha = 0.0055
-German parents rated psychological autonomous goals > hierarchal relation goals (most significant to personal interests & developing preferences)
-Nso parents rates hierarchal > autonomous (obedience & respect of elders)
-Nso mothers structured play more often than German mothers (0.82 vs. 0.52)
-More breaks with German mothers (0.18 vs. 0.08)
-Wait time average=> 7.44 min Nso vs. 4.81 min German

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

systematic variability

A

certain things only work in one condition (random assignment issue)

needs to by UNsystematic for internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

combined threats

A

-Selection history threats
-Selection attrition threats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

selection history threats

A

an outside event/factor affects only those in one level of an IV

17
Q

selection attrition threats

A

only one of the experimental groups experiences attrition

18
Q

double-blind study

A

neither Ps nor researchers (who evaluate them) know who is in the treatment vs. comparison groups

19
Q

masked design

A

Ps know which group they’re in, but observers do not