Testimony Flashcards

1
Q

when is a witness eligible and when are they compellable

A

a witness is eligible if they are lawfully able to give evidence on behalf of both prosecution and defence. A witness is compellable if they can be required to give evidence against their will for both prosecution and defence. Once a witness has entered the witness box and been sworn, they are under a compellable obligation to answer all questions put to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

s71(1)

A

any person is eligible to give evidence and a person who is eligible to give evidence is compellable to give that evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

compellability of a spouse

A

a spouse in no longer compellable to give evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

judges, jurors and counsel

A

s72 - judge in a proceeding is not eligible to give evidence in that proceeding.

Unless given permission by a judge, a person acting as a juror or counsel in a proceedingis ineligible to give evidence in that proceeding.

If juror is given permission they would be discharged from the jury and trial proceeds with 11 jurors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

who is not compellable to give evidence

A
  • the defendant in proceeding
  • an associated defendant is not compellable to give evidence against a defendant
  • judges in respect of their conduct as a judge, the sovereign, governor general, and sovereign head of state of a foreign country
  • bank officers where the bank is not a party to the proceedings no bank officer is compellable to produce banking records if the contents can be proven under the “business records” exception to the hearsay rule (s19) or to prove the matters recorded in the bank records
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

s73(2) an associated defendant is not compellable to give evidence for or against a defendant unless what

A

a) associated defendant is being tried separately from the defendant; or
b) proceedings against the associated defendant has been determined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the meaning of an associated defendant

A

s73(4) associated defendant means:

in relation to a defendant in a criminal proceeding, means a person against whom a prosecution has been instituted for

(a) an offence that arose in relation to the same events as did the offence for which the defendant is being prosecuted; or
(b) an offence that relates to, or is connected with, the offence for which the defendant is being prosecuted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

privilege in relation to giving of evidence is what

A

privilege in relation to giving of evidence is the right to refuse to disclose or to prevent disclosure of what would otherwise be admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

categories of privilege

A
  • communication with legal advisors
  • solicitors trust accounts
  • preparatory materials for proceedings
  • settlement negotiations or mediation
  • communications with ministers of religion
  • information obtained by medical practitioners and clinical psychologists
  • privilege against self incrimination
  • informer privilege
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when may privilege be waived

A

privilege may be waived at any time by the person entitled to rely on it, does not necessarily mean that privilege has been waived for all purposes. Despite a waiver under s25, an interested person may still apply for an order that the privileged material remains inadmissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

when would communication with a legal adviser be privileged

A
  • the communication must be intended to be confidential

- the communication must be made for the purposes of obtaining or giving legal services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

communications with legal advisers further

A
  1. communications must be intended to be confidential
  2. comms must be made for purpose of obtaining/giving legal services
  3. privilege is vested in the person seeking or receiving the legal services. If that person waives privilege judge may still order evidence of communication not to be given
  4. privilege does not extend to communications made for any dishonest purpose or to enable or aid anyone to commit an offence
  5. if communication was intended to be confidential, the fact that it is inadvertently over heard by others does not abrogate the privilege, even if no precautions were taken to preserve confidentiality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is required under s58 for communications with ministers of religion to be protected as privilege

A
  • must be made in confidence and within ministers capacity as minister of religion
  • made for the purpose of the person obtaining or receiving from the minister religious or spiritual advice, benefit, or comfort.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

s59 of EA 2006 Privilege with regards to medical practitioner and clinical psychologist

A

s59

(1) This section -
(a) applies to a person who consults or is examined by a medical practitioner or a clinical psychologist for drug dependency or any other condition or behaviour that may manifest itself in criminal conduct; but

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when does privilege not apply with regards to communications with medical practitioner or clinical psychologists

A

s59(1)(b) does not apply in the case of a person who has been required by an order of a Judge, or by other lawful authority, to submit himself or herself to the medical practitioner or clinical psychologist for any examination, test, or for any other purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is self incrimination

A

self incrimination is defined by the act as the provision by a person of information that could reasonably lead to or increase the likelihood of, the prosecution of that person for a criminal offence (s4 EA 2006)

This will apply not only to information directly admitting criminal acts, but also to matters forming links in the chain of proving such acts

17
Q

what offences listed under s121 of EA 2006 require corroboration

A
  • perjury
  • false oaths
  • false statements and declarations
  • treason
18
Q

what is corroboration

A

it is independent evidence that tends to confirm or support some fact of which other evidence is given and implicates the defendant in the crime charged

19
Q

what is an informer

A

s64 of EA 2006

(2) A person is an informer for the purposes of this section if the person—

(a)
has supplied, gratuitously or for reward, information to an enforcement agency, or to a representative of an enforcement agency, concerning the possible or actual commission of an offence in circumstances in which the person has a reasonable expectation that his or her identity will not be disclosed; and

(b) is not called as a witness by the prosecution to give evidence relating to that information.

20
Q

with regards to corroboration, where there is a jury what is not necessary for the judge to do under s121(2) of EA 2006

A

a) warn the jury that it is dangerous to act on uncorroborated evidence or give warning to the same or similar effect
b) give a direction relating to the absence of corroboration

21
Q

what two offences require corroboration as a matter of law

A

for the offences of perjury and treason, the unsupported evidence of one witness is insufficient to support a conviction