TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES Flashcards
INTRODUCTION
- Testimonial privileges permit a person to refuse to disclose, & prohibit others from disclosing, certain confidential info in judicial proceedings.
Exam Approach
- On the bar, privileges are usually tested in a straightforward manner & you’ll apply general rules covered.
- However, you may be asked to determine whether federal/ state privilege law should be applied in a particular case in fed ct.
- The answer to this question is as follows:
(1) In a federal court case arising under federal substantive law (all civil cases arising under Constitution/federal statutes, & all criminal cases), privileges are governed by federal CL.
(2) In a fed ct case based on diversity jurisdiction, where state substantive law applies to parties’ claims & defenses (the Erie doctrine, covered in Federal Civil Procedure), fed ct must apply privilege law of the state.
Federal Common Law Privileges
- The Federal Rules have no specific privilege provisions; privilege in federal cts is governed by CL principles as interpreted by the cts.
- Fed cts currently recognize the following major privileges:
(1) Attorney-client privilege;
(2) Spousal immunity;
(3) Privilege for confidential marital communications;
(4) Psychotherapist/social worker-client privilege;
(5) Clergy-penitent privilege; and
(6) Governmental privileges - Other privileges not listed above (such as physician-patient, accountant-client, professional journalist) are only recognized by certain states.
Persons Who May Assert Privilege
- A privilege is personal to holder; meaning, it generally
can be asserted only by holder. - Sometimes the person w/ whom the confidence was shared may assert privilege on holder’s behalf.
Confidentiality
- To be privileged, a communication must be shown/ presumed to have been made in confidence (not intended to be disclosed to third parties).
Comment on Privilege Forbidden
- Neither counsel for the parties nor judge may comment
on someone’s claim of privilege
Waiver
- Any privilege is waived by:
(1) failure to claim privilege;
(2) voluntary disclosure of privileged matter by privilege holder; or
(3) a contractual provision waiving in advance the right to claim a privilege.
Tip
Privilege is not waived when someone wrongfully discloses info w/o privilege holder’s consent. Similarly, waiver by one joint holder does not affect right of other holder to assert privilege.
Eavesdroppers
- Privilege based on confidential communications is not destroyed b/c it was overheard by someone whose presence is unknown to parties.
- Under the modern view, in absence of negligence by person claiming privilege, even eavesdropper would be prohibited from testifying.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
- Communications between an attorney & client, made during professional consultation, are privileged from disclosure.
- The privilege applies to:
(1) Confidential communications,
(2) Between attorney & client (or reps of either),
(3) Made during professional legal consultation,
(4) Unless privilege is waived/exception is applicable
-The important elements of this privilege are discussed in more detail below.
Attorney-Client Relationship
- An “attorney” is a member of the bar, or someone the client reasonably believes to be a member of the bar.
- The “client” must be seeking professional services of attorney at the time of the communication.
- Disclosures made before attorney accepts/declines the case are covered by privilege.
Corporate Clients
- Corporations are “clients” statements made by corporate officials/employees to an attorney are protected if employees were authorized/directed by corporation to make such statements.
Confidential Communication
- Privilege applies to communications only; it does not apply to underlying info, pre-existing docs, or physical evidence.
- To be protected, communication must be confidential (not intended to be disclosed to 3rd parties); communications made in known presence & hearing of a stranger are not privileged.
- However, reps of attorney/client may be present w/o destroying privilege.
Communications Through Agents
- Communications made to 3rd persons (admin assistants, messengers, or accountants) are confidential & covered by privilege if necessary to transmit info between attorney & client.
Tip
A favorite exam topic involves communications
between client & doctor during an examination
made at attorney’s request (this is usually done to help attorney evaluate extent of client’s injuries). Be careful—the physician-patient privilege (infra) does not apply because no treatment is contemplated.
However, attorney-client privilege will apply to these
communications between client & consulting doctor, if doctor is not called as testifying expert.
Joint Client Rule—No Privilege Where Attorney Acts
for Both Parties
- If 2/more clients w/ common interest consult same
attorney, their communications w/ attorney concerning common interest are privileged as to 3rd parties. - But if joint clients later have a dispute w/ each other
concerning common interest & one client sues the
other, privilege does not apply as between them.