Test2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

The Fundamental Human Motive

A

Search for success,
Superiority,
Freedom from helplessness,
Escape from fear,
& perfection and personal completeness!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Basic Adlerian Assumptions

A

All behavior has social meaning
All behavior has a purpose and is goal-directed
Behavior represents “unity” and has a pattern
Behavior is designed to overcome feelings of inferiority and move toward feelings of superiority
Behavior is the result of our subjective perceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Freud vs. Adler

A

While Freud focused on:
– Sexual and aggressive pleasure-seeking
Adler focused on:
– The striving to compensate for one’s own PERCEIVED inferiorities, for one’s enforced states of helplessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inferiority and Compensation

A

Inferiority Complex
– Overcome by a feeling of lack of worth which leads to the impossibility for self-improvement
– If repressed, this may be felt as a superiority complex
Behave arrogantly (which personality disorder?)
Exaggerate their achievements
– E.g., people who claim telepathic powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Organ inferiority

A

– ALL people succumb to “disease” in the most poorly
developed organ
We may compensate for poor development (e.g., stutterer orator)
– Early states (more biological) later (subjective)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Aggressive drive

A

– People develop a hostile reaction to their perceived helplessness (e.g., baby’s first cry)
– Aggression may be expressed outright (e.g., fighting, cruelty) or may be transformed (e.g., competition, striving for dominance or mastery)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Superiority & Perfection Striving

A

– Masculine protest leads to “mask” of compensatory traits designed to spark self-improvement
– People create “fictional goals” and strive to attain them
This is more “realistic” than it may sound; NOT perfectionism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Masculine protest

A

– “Masculinity” implies greater competence or superiority
People strive for competence & superiority
Adler generally rejected gender roles
– Marks shift from biology to psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Three Tasks of life

A

– Societal Tasks
To be interested in others; to make friends
– Work Tasks
Interest in cooperative activity for the benefit of others; provides a sense of worth in society
– Love
Ability to take more interest in another than self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Style of Life

A

– Each of us sculpts our own personality
– Established by 4 or 5
Individual’s attitudes toward society, work, and love
– The individual’s choice! The creative life force tries to lead to fulfillment!
Begins as a compensatory process
– People develop consistency in personality while trying to make up for an inferiority
Law of Movement:
– Direction taken by the person that originates in his or her ability to exercise free choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mistaken Styles of Life

A

Ruling Type
– Dominate others; Confront problems in a selfish way.
– May be high achievers, but are generally vain and overly competitive
Getting Type
– Dependent; Adopt a passive attitude towards others.
– More likely to be depressed
Avoiding Type
– Tend to isolate themselves, and seem “cold” to others
– Hide a subtle, and fragile, superiority belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Appropriate Style of Life

A

Socially Useful Type
– Act in a way that benefits others
Not just in an economic sense; artists and actors help others to “feel,” for example:
Research shows that our Style of Life is generally consistent from childhood to adulthood (Pulkkinnen, 1992)

Early Recollections (usu. about age 3 ½)
Commonly used by Adlerian therapists
Used to assess people’s lifestyles
– Indicates how a person views himself, his/her personal strivings, and others
Fact is not important!
– The present determines the past
– A first memory remains because it has been thought about repeatedly during life: It is subjectively important to that person . . .
Emotional content is the most important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does one’s family impact personality development?

A

Mother is greatest influence
– Guides development of social interest
Father is second greatest influence
– Provides encouragement to pursue interests
Birth order
– Family size and sex of siblings cause individual differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Adlerian Advice to Parents

A

Encourage the child rather than punish
Be firm, but do not dominate
Show respect to the child
Emphasize cooperation
Don’t give the child TOO much attention (pampering)
– But do not neglect the child!
Do not struggle for power with the child
Do not show excessive sympathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Birth Order: Adler’s Hypotheses

A

First-Born
– Will not do well with “dethronement”
More likely to act antagonistically against others
Will “seek others”
Second-Born
– Stimulated to higher achievement via competition with older siblings
Most likely to be successful
Will likely isolate themselves in pursuit of success
Later-Born
– Tend to be pampered and spoiled
More likely to be “getting type”
Expect over-indulgence from others
Only Children
– Exaggerated sense of self-importance
Must be center of attention
Most differences are between first-born and others
– 1st born are higher in achievement motivation
– Tend to have higher levels of success
– Tend to be more self-centered (narcissistic)
– Tend to be Type A, especially if female
– Tend to be anxious, especially if male

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Adlerian Therapy

A

Stages:
– Empathy and relationship
Establish a working relationship
– Information Gathering
Client’s history, early memories, and current functioning
– Clarification
Client’s core beliefs about self, others, and life
– Encouragement
Encourage progress towards a new Style of Life
– Interpretation and recognition
Helping client to reconsider their fictional finalism *
– Knowing
Client can monitor their behavior with less input from therapist
– Emotional Breakthrough
Old patterns are discarded via imagery and roleplay
– Doing Differently
Client behaves differently in life
– Reinforcement
Client begins to pay more attention to others’ needs rather than their own
– Social Interest
A sense of community is established
– Goal Redirection
A new goal to strive for
– Support and Launching
Client strives towards new goal in the spirit of social interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fictional Finalism

A

The Psychology of “As If”
The nature of goals
– Imagined goals
– Determining how to achieve them
As always, in the spirit of social interest!
Guided Self-Ideal
– Subjective and personally meaningful
– Created by the individual to navigate through life’s obstacles
(Adler argued that human beings envision desirable goals for the future, and even though these goals may not be real, they serve as an incentive for individual action and help people overcome difficulties. Such goals are not just for the benefit of the individual, but for the benefit of the wider society.)
Memento Mori (What can you do before you die)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Developmental Stages

A

Universal – All people encounter them
But culture organizes the experience of its members
Cultures not only provide the setting in which crises are encountered but provide continuing support for the ego development that has occurred
– Especially when threatened in later life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Crisis

A

Rise to the surface when the environment makes demands of us: Called a crisis
– Involves a shift in perspective new strengths can develop
– Can choose adaptive or maladaptive solutions
More adaptive responses lead to “virtues”
Passage is not automatic, and environment can help or hinder our progress
– Ritualizations help resolve a conflict
E.g., social opportunities to support growth
– Ritualisms don’t: They are too rigid
E.g., elitism
Stage 1: Trust vs. Mistrust
Basic trust: The sense that others are dependable and will provide what is needed
– Food, milk, and sensory stimulation
Otherwise, basic mistrust is formed
– Some sense of mistrust is inevitable, as no parent can provide exactly what is needed exactly when it is needed! (Trust me)
Stage 2: Autonomy(自主移动) versus Shame/Doubt
Child becomes adequate (autonomous: able to move) in:
– Toilet training (emphasized by Freud)
– Ambulation(Able to move)
– Interpersonal relationships
Otherwise, there is shame in Self
– Some degree of Shame is necessary and good, but a high degree of autonomy should prevail
Stage 3: Initiative(自主能动性) versus Guilt
The child begins determining what type of person they are going to be, as they begin to interact more with others (“intruding others’ space”)
Child develops a conscience (Freudian)
If the child is supported and acts appropriately, they will have more initiative than guilt
Stage 4: Industry(创造) versus Inferiority(自卑)
The child “learns to win recognition by producing things.”
– If the child perseveres and creates good, quality objects, they will become industrious
– If not, this leads to a feeling of inferiority
Stage 5: Identity versus Identity Confusion(自我认知和自我困惑)
In adolescence, the task is to answer the question, “Who am I?”
– Must be agreed upon by individual and society
Identity confusion occurs when a coherent identity cannot be established
A negative identity may also be established
– Based on social norms
A moratorium may be established(某些活动的暂停)
– Adolescents are encouraged to explore possibilities (e.g., change majors, etc.)
Fidelity(忠诚): Sustaining loyalties despite possible aversive(讨厌的) consequences
Stage 6: Intimacy (亲密) versus Isolation(孤独)
Cannot occur until identity has been established!
Intimacy is the fusion or merging of identities with a friend or lover
– One’s own identity is not threatened, however
NOT the same as sexual intimacy
RESEARCH: Intimacy increases during early adulthood (Reis et al., 1993)
Stage 7: Generativity(动力) versus Stagnation(停滞)
Generativity is the interest in guiding the next generation
– Highly involved in their work and the growth of young people
– Concerned about broad social issues
– Are able to strike a balance between self-serving and societal-serving needs
– E.g., parenting, teaching, mentoring
Alternative is stagnation
Stage 8: Integrity versus Despair
Integrity
– Being able to look back and say that one’s life was meaningful and valuable
– Not wishing that things had been different
The alternative is despair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Cross-cultural differences in psychosocial stages

A

– McClain (1975): South African blacks scored lower on identity development than whites
To Erikson, an indication of ritualism – namely, racism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Male and Female identities

A

– Differences
Women emphasize interpersonal issues
Men emphasize occupational issues
– Similarities
Men and women do not differ in their level of achieved identity
– It appears that, while the result is the same, the process is different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Erikson‘s Contributions

A

– Role of culture and lifelong development, as previously discussed
– Identity is dynamic!
Limitations
– Some descriptions are somewhat ambiguous
Willpower
Wisdom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Erikson: Differences from Freud

A

De-emphasized the importance of unconsciousness
– Focused on psychosocial stages
Decreased role of sexual stages
“Fixation” does not cause “stagnation,” generally speaking
– But identity must be established for intimacy to occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Normal Personality Development

A

Children develop “basic confidence” in themselves and others
Most likely when parents convey:
– Predictable warmth
– Interest
– respect

24
Q

Abnormal Development

A

Child feels . . .
– Small, helpless, deserted, and endangered
– . . . In a world that is out to abuse, cheat, attack, humiliate, and betray
Caused by parents who . . .
– Belittle
– Are indifferent
– Make false promises
– Otherwise abuse . . .
* Leads to Basic Anxiety, the root of neurosis

25
Q

Basic Anxiety

A

A child’s feeling of being isolated and helpless in a hostile world.
– Wants to be helpless/dependent, but can’t
– Wants to be angry/aggressive (basic hostility), but can’t
A reaction to parental neglect or rejection
– Child cannot act in a hostile manner, for fear that it would result in further punishment or neglect
But children also cannot act in a dependent manner, for fear of further rejection
-》Towards increased anxiety!
– Child needs parents and wants to approach them
– But simultaneously hates them and wants to punish them!

26
Q

What should a child do: Three Interpersonal Orientations

A

Means of interpersonal control and coping:
– Moving Toward-> Getting type
Self-effacing solution: more dependence (women more)
Ingratiating; “human doormats”
– Moving Against -> Ruling type
Expansive solution: more aggressive to crush the dominator (man more)
Aggressive and domineering
– Moving Away -> Avoid Type
Resignation solution: move away, being isolated
Avoid people altogether
– See people as being essentially troublesome and demanding
Moving Toward: Self-effacing (more dependence to others)
Morbid dependency: The need for a partner
Feeling weak and helpless
Assuming others are superior to themselves
Sacrificing for others
– So that others will like them
Need for love
– Find self-worth in a relationship
Moving Against: The Expansive Solution
Narcissistic ()
– Love their own high self-image
Perfectionistic
Arrogant
– And vindictive of those who “try” to pull them down
Need to be right
– Argumentative
Need for recognition
Moving Away: The detached personality
Resigned; Strive for little
Desire freedom
– Rebel against any constraints from others
An “on-looker”: Detached from emotional experiences
Self-sufficient and independent
– Remain uninvolved with others
Need for privacy

27
Q

Neuroticism to Horney

A

Everybody changes their stances to others from time to time (move towards to move away) . . .
But neurotic people are unable to shift the posture of the 3 orientations.
– “indiscriminate(毫无例外的对待别人) application to all persons”

28
Q

The Neurotic Needs:

A

-Moving toward
For affection and approval
A partner who will take over one’s life
– Moving Against
For power, control over others, or for omnipotence
To exploit others and get the better of them
For social recognition and prestige
For personal admiration
For personal achievement
For perfection
– Moving Away
To restrict one’s life within narrow borders
For self-sufficiency and independence
The overlap with today’s personality disorders is fairly obvious and Horney spent many years trying to categorize the 10 discrete trends into descriptors of personalities (both normal and abnormal)
None of these “needs” is, by itself, abnormal!
Neurotic needs resemble healthy values, but differ in 4 key ways:
– Disproportionate in intensity
– Indiscriminate in application to all persons
– Evidence extreme disregard for reality (不切实际的想法)
– Provoke intense anxiety when unsatisfied

29
Q

Jealousy

A

The fear of losing a relationship that is viewed as the best available means of satisfying an insatiable need for affection and incessant demand for unconditional love
– Jealousy can be “normal” or pathological(病态的)
Pathological adult jealousy is a carry-over from childhood neurosis involving unresolved basic anxiety and attachment to parents

30
Q

Tyranny of Shoulds

A

Belief that one “should” do things . . .
– Can generate guilt and anxiety
– Is part of the process of turning away from one’s real self and towards their ideal self

31
Q

Fear of Success

A

Belief that women are likely to undermine their abilities because men are competitive and lead women to believe they are bad if they are successful

32
Q

Need for perfection

A

Related: Neurotic Search for Glory: Striving for Idealized Self

33
Q

Major Adjustments to Basic Anxiety

A

Neurotic individuals use defense mechanisms, some of which we have already studied (Freud) But also some new ones!
Eclipsing the Conflict(重叠的解决手段)
– “Eclipse” the conflict by raising the opposite to predominance
Hostile Dependent (moving towards)
Dependent Hostile (moving against)
Detachment
– Moving away from others to reduce the conflict (moving away)
The Idealized Self (For perfection seeking)
– Move away from “real self”
The unique, alive, and personnel center of ourselves
– Moving towards someone “ideal” (e.g., less helpless and more perfect)
For these people, their “real self” is not valuable. Hence, they move towards their “ideal” self
Externalization (like projection)
– Projects inner conflicts onto the outside world
E.g., If one feels rage . . .
– Get irritated easily by others
– Believe that others are irritated with us
– Experience somatic complaints!

34
Q

Secondary Adjustments to Basic Anxiety – Ideal self

A

Blind Spots
– Being unaware of overt behavior that is incompatible with idealized self-image
E.g., patient who “shot at” co-workers using finger
Compartmentalization(Action inconsistent)
– Incompatible behaviors are recognized, but solely within different arenas
E.g., patient who saw “ruthless” behavior at work but not in family

34
Q

Secondary Adjustments to Basic Anxiety – Minimizing Conflict

A

Arbitrary Rightness (你是对的)
– Declaring, arbitrarily and dogmatically, that I am right
Inner doubts are denied and external challenges are discredited
Elusiveness(我不站队我就没有敌人)
– Almost the exact opposite of Arbitrary rightness
– Do not commit to any opinion!
Decreases the chance of experiencing conflict

35
Q

Therapy

A

Therapist provides security to delve into unhappy or painful topics
Therapist encourages patient to explore current relationships, including expectations that affect relationships
Therapist/Client relationship is explored, which
allows patient to understand assumptions about themselves and their parents
Therapist helps patient explore how childhood
experiences influence current expectations,
perceptions, and emotions
Are these images adaptive? If not, must form new
images

36
Q

Bem sex role inventory

A

The Bem Sex-Inventory Index (BSRI) is a self-reported 60-item survey to characterize a person as masculine, feminine, or “androgynous” as a function of the difference between their endorsement of masculine and feminine personality characteristics.

37
Q

Personality(For Gordon Allport)

A

Personality is the dynamic organization of those psychophysiological systems within a person that determine his/her unique adjustments to their environment
– Each person is unique!
– Broad theories need not apply!
– Idiographic!
About the individuals

38
Q

Traits(For Gordon Allport)

A

Stable and pervasive individual differences
Not present at birth, but develop from learning, maturation, and development
Different from habit (involve just specific behaviors) or attitudes (for or against a specific object)
– Common Traits
All people may be compared on this dimension; common to all people
– Individual Traits
Not possessed by all people; could be possessed by just one person

39
Q

Methods of Inferring Traits

A

Language; use of dictionary
– Allport believed that psychology should begin with“the wisdom of common experience.”
– 4.5% (17,953) words may be classified as traits
Neutral (e.g., assertive)
Temporary moods (e.g., alarmed, ashamed)
Convey social or characterological judgment
– E.g., adorable, asinine
Miscellaneous
– Developmental conditions
– Capacities
Behavior
– Behavior infers traits/interests
– Also confers energy level
E.g., slow, graceful, etc.
Personal Documents
– The coding of letters, diaries, public statements, etc.
Letters from Jenny:
Effort to conduct idiographic research
301 letters written by a woman to her son’s friend
(Allport himself!). Determined to have eight basic traits, including being . . .
– Quarrelsome – Suspicious
– Self-Centered
– Independent – Autonomous
– Aggressive
– Etc.
Personality Measurement
– Questionnaires
E.g., Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values (60 questions)
– Wanted to study the individual
– Factor analysis “loses the individual in the average.”

40
Q

Personal Traits (For Gordon Allport)

A

Cardinal
– Single trait determines all behavior
– “The eminent trait, the ruling passion, the master
sentiment.”
* Christ-like
* Chauvinistic
Central
– Frequently evidenced in behavior (e.g., extroverted)
Secondary
– Very circumscribed
E.g., Athletic

41
Q

Stage Theory

A

Self-identity (1,2 – 4,5)
– Understanding self as separate person
– Recognizing themselves by name, with enduring individuality
Ego enhancement (2,3 - ??)
– Self-esteem through achievement (as well as humiliation and selfishness)
Ego extension (3,4 - ??)
– Personal possessions (不断膨胀的成功的喜悦和对失败的失望)
Self-image (4,6 - ??)
– Understand abilities, status, and roles as well as aspirations for future
– Aware of acting in a “good or bad” manner
Rational agent (6-12)
– Learns problem solving and practical skills
Propriate Striving (Adolescence)
– Planning for future; setting long-term goals
The Knower (adulthood)
– Integrates the previous seven aspects together
– “possessions” become valued interests and causes
– “Unity” is characteristic of mature, adult personalities

41
Q

Marlowe-Crowne and Cook-Medley Hostility Scale

A

Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale is a type of response bias that is the tendency of survey respondents to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others. It can take the form of over-reporting “good behavior” or under-reporting “bad”, or undesirable behavior. The tendency poses a serious problem with conducting research with self-reports. This bias interferes with the interpretation of average tendencies as well as individual differences.
The Cook–Medley Hostility Scale (Ho) is a standard in psychology designed to measure an individual’s personality and temperament, specifically degrees of hostility. Initially developed as a scale for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), scores from the hostility scale represent the individual’s disposition towards cynicism and chronic hate. Scores from the scale have been used by studies as a predictor of the measured individual’s risk of developing certain health problems as well as the success of their interpersonal relationships.

42
Q

Qualities of a normal, mature adult

A

Extensions of the Sense of Self
– Having many interests: Can “lose” oneself in contemplation, recreation, and loyalty (沉浸于某事时对自我感觉的丧失)
– “Being able to talk for half a day without revealing his/her occupation.”
Warm Human Interaction
– Sincere and friendly; not proscribed by rigid roles/expectations
Emotional Security
– Accept themselves for who they are and have high self-esteem
Realistic Perception, Skills, and Assignments
– Unrealistic optimism or pessimism is avoided(不切实际的乐观或者悲观能够被避免)
Self-Objectification: Insight and Humor(对自我的客观认知)
– See themselves accurately and have insight into themselves (often adding a sense of humor)
Unifying Philosophy of Life(对)
– One’s individual demands also meet the demands of society(being socially useful)

43
Q

Unitas Multiplex

A

“The unity of multiples” (众人的相似之处,为了对个人的分析 ideographic)
Integration of diverse elements of the personality:
– Interests
– Traits
– Biological Predispositions (Scaning brain by Electroencholography EEG)
Urged psychologists to study the individual as a whole
– Stressed idiographic research in this regard

44
Q

Personality Consistency

A

Why are people consistent?
– Proprium: All the ways in which people project themselves into the future (a sense of self)
Unites a person’s attitudes, perceptions, and intentions
Pursuing future goals leads to consistent behavior

44
Q

Trait Development

A

Whatever the origin of a trait, it will eventually function on its own!! (functional autonomy:)
– Although we may begin to act a specific way because of a childhood experience, it eventually
becomes autonomous . . .
E.g., Although we may become very “handy” for external praise, we eventually appreciate/value our skills for what they are and continue to work on them

45
Q

Raymond Cattell definition of traditional terms:

A

Personality:
Is that which permits a prediction of what a person will do in a given situation
Traits:
The units of personality that have predictive value

46
Q

Factor Analysis

A

A procedure for analyzing a set of correlations among various measures into a simpler underlying pattern, termed a “factor structure.”
– Gather information via observations
– Compute correlations between variables
– Identify significant correlations
– Name the factors!
Interpretation may be difficult
High correlations may not mean that they are directly related
– Price of milk over the years
– My age
– Average temperature of the globe

47
Q

Two ideas regarding the research approach

A

Data Types
– Q-data
Questionnaire
– L-data
“Life” data
Behavioral observation (How do you behave in real life)
– T-data
“Test data”
Lab tests, like physiological data
Data Analysis
– R-technique (Correlations)
Usually With Q-data
Hundreds of people take questionnaires and then F. A. the data
When the questionnaires are strongly correlated, they should be merged into one.
– dR-technique
Same as R, but people take the test twice to assess change. See how changes relate to one another
– P-technique
One person over and over; used to study STATES, not TRAITS

48
Q

Types of Traits

A

Surface Trait
– Traits that are at the level of observable behavior
Source Trait
– A primary factor derived from factor analysis
Ability Trait – how a person works to a desired goal (e.g., intelligence)
Temperament Trait –
General style with which someone carries out tasks (e.g., positive affect)
Dynamic Trait – Provides energy and direction to action; motivations and interests (i.e., Ergs and Metaergs)
Gregarious, helping and humorous are the surface trait that can directly collect by Questionnaire
Friendliness is the source trait that made up to link these

49
Q

A Special Ability Trait: Intelligence

A

Fluid Intelligence (e.g., Raven’s Progressive Matrices)
– The innate ability to learn
– “Fluid” because it can be expressed in different types of learning, depending on opportunities presented to the individual
Crystallized Intelligence (e.g., SAT)
– Includes the effects of opportunity or education
– Cattell was particularly interested in trying to learn about Fluid intelligence, outside of the domain of education

50
Q

Dynamic Traits

A

Ergs (energy motivates to satisfy ego needs)
– Constitutional dynamic source traits (like instincts)
– Innate motivational traits (include anger, curiosity, fear, greed, hunger, loneliness, pity, pride, sensuousness, and sexual interest)
– Expression of “instincts” is learned
Sex -> mating
Food -> eat what?
Metaergs
– Environmentally-molded source traits
– Learned motivations
Sentiments: Formed early and are enduring(情感依赖)
– E.g., religion, politics
Attitudes: More specific(态度)
– E.g., value of
Mather’s/Father’s Day

51
Q

Subsidiation

A

A type of meta-erg
Learning from society to satisfy the ergonomic needs of
Basic drives are met by multi-step sequences
– E.g., in part because we need to eat, we work!
– They are “means-end” activities

52
Q

Cattell’s 16PF

A

Measures that Cattell saw as the most important source traits
– Each is measured dimensionally (1 to 100 as opposed to yes/no)

52
Q

The Big Five (Costa & McCrae)

A

Openness to Experience: Intelligence scores 9%
– Wide interests, original, curious, artistic, imaginative
* Conscientiousness
– Thorough, reliable, persevering, efficient
* Extraversion
– Talkative, energetic, enthusiastic, outgoing
* Agreeableness
– Helpful, trusting, forgiving, considerate, cooperative
* Emotional Stability vs. “Neuroticism”
– Relaxed, stable, confident, calm

53
Q

Heritability(Big five 有遗传性)

A

The extent to which two people with similar genetic status have similar personality, even when they have developed in different environments
– Twins who are raised apart
– Each of The Big 5 have been found to be significantly acquired from genetics