Test your knowledge - Part 5 Flashcards
- What principle of the UK Corporate Governance Code sets out the approach in respect of relations with shareholders and what does it recommend?
What principle of the UK Corporate Governance Code sets out the approach in respect of relations with shareholders and what does it recommend?
Principle D states that the board should ensure effective engagement with, and encourage participation from, shareholders and stakeholders in order for the company to meet its responsibilities to these parties.
- Define what institutional investors are and give some examples.
Define what institutional investors are and give some examples?
Organisations that have large amounts of funds to invest and put much of these funds into companies they invest in. Examples are pension funds, insurance companies and collective investment institutions (such as unit trusts).
- Which provision of the UK Corporate Governance Code covers engagement with major shareholders and what does it recommend?
Which provision of the UK Corporate Governance Code covers engagement with major shareholders and what does it recommend?
Provision 3 states….
that in addition to formal general meetings, the chair should seek regular engagement with major shareholders in order to understand their views on governance and performance against the strategy. The chair should ensure that he and the board as a whole has a clear understanding of the view of shareholders.
It also states that committee chairs should seek engagement with shareholders on significant matters related to their areas of responsibility.
The senior independent director, when called upon should meet a sufficient range of major shareholders to develop a balanced understanding of their views
- What are the main rules and regulations in respect of directors’ share dealings under the Market Abuse Regulation?
What are the main rules and regulations in respect of directors’ share dealings under the Market Abuse Regulation?
- Must not deal in shares during Closed Periods
- Must not deal at any time if they are privy to price sensitive information
- Must seek clearance from Chairman
- Exceptional circumstances to deal during prohibited period
- Connected persons (see below) cannot deal during prohibited periods
Section 252 Companies Act 2006 sets out the definitions for connected persons, which includes members of a director’s family.
Section 253 sets out which family members are deemed connected persons:
(a) spouse or civil partner;
(b) any other person (whether of a different sex or the same sex) with whom the director lives as partner in an enduring family relationship (but excluding grandparent or grandchild, sister, brother, aunt or uncle, or nephew or niece)
(c) children or step-children;
(d) any children or step-children of a person within paragraph (b) (and who are not children or step-children of the director) who live with the director and have not attained the age of 18;
(e) the director’s parents.
- What information should an Insider List contain?
What information should an Insider List contain?
- Identity of any person having access to inside information
- The reason for including that person on the insider list
- The date and time at which the person obtained access to inside information
- The date on which the insider list was drawn up
- Which section of the Companies Act 2006 links to relations with shareholders/ stakeholders and how?
Which section of the Companies Act 2006 links to relations with shareholders/ stakeholders and how?
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 provides for the directors’ duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members (shareholders) as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to the interests of employees, business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, the impact of operations on the community and the environment other parties including employees, relationships – in general terms, stakeholders.
- Explain what is meant by ‘shareholder activism’.
Explain what is meant by ‘shareholder activism’.
Activities by institutional investors to influence governance and strategy decisions in companies they invest in.
In most cases, activism is constructive, involving dialogue and discussion, and it is only when a board of directors fails to respond in an acceptable or appropriate way to shareholder concerns that more aggressive action may be considered.
Shareholder activism can attract publicity. Its potential strength is that it brings pressure to bear on companies from negative publicity that shareholder opposition to the board can create.
‘red top’ notices advising members to vote against the resolution may have the effect of persuading shareholders how to vote.
The emergence of ‘wolf packs’ is an example of where hedge funds are joining together with other activists to push through agendas in companies to make short term gains. These activities are not usually in the best interests of the company in the longer term.
- List the main principles of the Stewardship Code 2020.
List the main principles of the Stewardship Code 2020.
Principles for asset owners and asset managers:
A. Purpose and governance:
Consisting of principles 1-5 for service providers
B. Investment approach:
(6) client and beneficiary needs;
(7) stewardship, investment and ESG integration;
(8) monitoring managers and service providers
C. Engagement: (9), (10) collaboration; (11) escalation
D. Exercising rights and responsibilities (12)
Principles for service providers:
- Purpose, strategy and culture
- Governance, resources and incentives
- Conflicts of interest
- Promoting well-functioning markets
- Supporting clients’ stewardship
- Review and assurance
- What types of meetings (as identified in the ABI guidance) can be held between a company and institutional investors?
What types of meetings (as identified in the ABI guidance) can be held between a company and institutional investors?
- Ongoing meetings – regular updates re strategy, financing, performance and governance
- Specific meetings – to consult shareholders on a specific issue to obtain their views (e.g. a proposal the board intends to put to a general meeting)
- Reactive meetings – relating to issues that have emerged unexpectedly, to ask for shareholder views to assist the company in responding in a way acceptable to shareholders
- Proactive meetings – relating to a shareholder concern re deteriorating trend or change that appears to be happening
- Systematic meetings – where a shareholder has a system for reviewing its investments and identifies the company as one where it considers closer engagement is needed
- Describe the ways in which a company can make the most effective use of its AGM.
Describe the ways in which a company can make the most effective use of its AGM.
One of the most important ways companies communicate with their shareholders is through the annual general meetings (AGM).
FRC Guidance on Board Effectiveness recommends that companies sent out the shareholders at least 20 working days before the meeting, the notice of the meeting and related papers.
This ensures that shareholders have sufficient time to consider any issues presented by the papers.
CA2006 requires a minimum of 21 calendar days.
Most effective use of its AGM
- Encourage attendance
- Giving shareholders the opportunity to ask questions
- Voting procedures, with separate resolutions for each substantially separate issue
- Proxy voting forms should include a ‘vote withheld’ box, in addition to ‘for’ and ‘against’
- Disclosure of information about proxy votes
OR consider the limitations of AGM’s:
- Only held once a year
- Difficult for shareholders to attend
- Limited duration
- Formal in nature, so limited opportunity for engagement and dialogue
- What is meant by the term “rewards for failure”?
What is meant by the term “rewards for failure”?
The term refers to remuneration packages for senior directors where the size of the reward (often a bonus) does not seem sufficiently linked to performance and large payments are made to outgoing executives (on dismissal) whose contracts have been terminated following poor company or individual performance.
- What are the overall aims of any executive remuneration package?
What are the overall aims of any executive remuneration package?
A remuneration package should attract individuals of a suitable calibre to senior positions, should enable the company to retain them for the mid to long term, and should motivate individuals towards achieving both company and individual performance
- Describe the mixture of elements recommended for executive remuneration packages.
Packages should consist of a combination of fixed pay and variable pay/short and long-term incentives, including:
- basic salary;
- payments into a pension scheme (or payments in lieu);
- annual bonus, usually linked to annual financial performance of the company;
- long-term incentives, usually share options/awards; and
- other benefits and perks, such as free medical insurance, company car or accommodation.
- What is the recommended composition for a Remuneration Committee? List five duties of the Remuneration Committee
What is the recommended composition for a Remuneration Committee? List five duties of the Remuneration Committee
Provision 32 states that the committee should consist of all independent NEDs, with a minimum of 3 (or 2 for smaller companies); the chair of the board can be a member, but not chair the committee; and the committee chair must have served on a remuneration committee for at least 12 months before their appointment.
Duties include:
- Determine and agree (with the board) the remuneration policy, set the remuneration for all executive directors and the chairman
- Recommend and monitor the level and structure of senior management remuneration.
- Decide targets for performance for any performance-related pay schemes
- Responsible for appointing remuneration consultants
- Report to the board and in the annual report on its work
- What are the main principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code in respect of remuneration?
What are the main principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code in respect of remuneration?
Principle P …
states that remuneration policies and practices should be designed to support strategy and promote long-term sustainable success. Executive remuneration should be aligned to company purpose and values, and be clearly linked to the successful delivery of the company’s long-term strategy.
Principle Q…
states that there should be a formal and transparent procedure for developing policy on executive remuneration and determining director and senior management remuneration. No director should be involved in deciding his or her own remuneration.
Principle R…
states that directors should exercise independent judgement and discretion when authorising remuneration outcomes, taking account of company and individual performance, and wider circumstances.
- Describe the recommendations that exist in respect of severance payments.
Describe the recommendations that exist in respect of severance payments….
The UK Corporate Governance Code states that the main aim in compensation payments is to avoid rewarding poor performance. The amount of severance pay should reflect a departing director’s obligation to mitigate losses. It is suggested that contracts should provide for a payment of compensation in stages, which would be stopped when the director found employment elsewhere.
The UK Code also states that notice periods in employment contracts of executive directors should be set at 1 year or less.
Provision 37 of the UK Corporate Governance Code provides that remuneration schemes and policies should include provisions that enable a company to recover and/or withhold sums or share awards and specify the circumstances in which it would be appropriate to do so.
The provision effectively requires listed companies to adopt malus and clawback provisions. Malus provisions allow the company to forfeit all or part of a payment/award before it has vested and been paid. Clawback provisions allow a company to recover sums already paid.
The joint statement made by the ABI and PLSA in 2008 sets out principles regarding the level of remuneration providing adequate compensation for the risk associated with an executive role; and that where severance payments arise from poor corporate performance they should not extend beyond basic salary.