Test 4 Flashcards

1
Q

What is a social problem? The objective and subjective components?

A
  • Any condition or behavior that has negative consequences for large numbers of people and that is generally recognized as a condition or behavior that needs to be addressed.
  • Objective: negative consequences for large numbers of people
  • Subjective: generally recognized as a condition or behavior that needs to be addressed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is the use of legal drugs policed?

A
  • licensed dispensing
  • corralling (public intoxication, driving under the influence)
  • age restrictions
  • economic measures (increasing prices, taxing) - makes lots of people unable to afford it, specifically youth
  • “Public Education” - legitimacy in recognizing it is a social problem through state funded education and advertising
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

War on drugs video - U.S perspective

A
  • 1990s incarceration rates in the US blew up, more than anywhere else in the world
  • crack & cocaine the same drug but administered differently, crack seen as a black drug, even though white people use it, and has a worse outcome legally for black people
  • war on drugs increased black/latino prisoners, 1971 prison population was 200,000, today it is over 2 million, growth of 900%
  • 1.5 mill drug arrests in 2014, more than 80% possession only, 1/2 for marijuana
  • white people are less targeted and ticketed
  • different approach to street drugs vs legal drugs
  • the way we focus the instrument of the criminal justice system is disproportionately, police presence & tickets is focused in certain neighbourhoods and not in others
  • war on drugs becomes a war on certain communities- racialized elements
  • no decrease in drug use because of this war on drugs, what are the gains?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Canada’s War on Drugs

A
  • also had its own war on drugs

- similarities in Canadas war on drugs to the U.S (some differences) and the overall message is of similar harms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Canada Policing Drugs (2014)

A
  • total drug offence arrests = 103,757
  • cannabis possession arrests = 57,314 - we dedicated over 50% of resources to something that is now legalized
  • trafficking/ production/ distribution arrests = 10,696
  • CAD gov’t spends $50 bill annually in policing drugs and drug habits
  • majority (55%) was spent for arrested people for possession of cannabis
  • money not being spent in best possible way
  • 3x as much money used for inmates than for students
  • Canada in partnership with U.S to attempt to dismantle drug cartels in southern countries, using military efforts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Canada Policing Drugs (more recent data - 2020)

A
  • $9 billion was spent on criminal justice associated with substance abuse, which amounts to $252 for every Canadian
  • Alcohol = $3.2 billion or 35.2%
  • Cocaine = $1.9 billion or 20.8%
  • Cannabis =$1.8 billion or 19.7%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CBC interview

A
  • wide spread drug use hasn’t decreased because of prohibition, prohibition just increased other issues such as criminal organized crime
  • more policing leads to more dangerous drugs
  • drug prohibition contributes to drug market violence and higher homicide rates, as well as criminalizing the population of dependent users (medical and social issue)
  • majority of people who are swept up into this are dependant users, which is not a policing issue its a medical issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CBC interview 2

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pros and Cons to a CJS approach to substance abuse

A

Pros
- created many jobs in the criminal justice system (structural functionalist perspective)

Cons

  • targets the victims of substance abuse, people addicted to it (the abusers)
  • mass incarceration (often black people, indigenous, people of colour)
  • over policing leads to seeing more violence (not regulated, can’t go to courts to settle cases, unregulated production of drugs, cutting costs, lacing drugs, etc)
  • not reducing substance use, actually creating more social problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

degree of criminal justice involvement

A

criminalization - to make something illegal (different degrees within)
- responses on a scale: (lower end) fines, community service, probation, charges, sentences, incarceration (higher end), death penalty (most criminalized degree)

decriminalization - measures for harm reduction

  • criminal justice as diversions
  • still fines, but more similar to speeding tickets
  • ex. public intoxicated, get fined but not arrested
  • decriminalization beneficial as it lessens fear & the attempt to hide, especially in terms of overdose

legalization - to make legal

  • alcohol, nicotine, marijuana
  • regulatory retail measures of dispensing and licensing
  • commercial production
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Canada’s degree of criminal justice involvement

A

Alcohol

  • legalized
  • regulated retail

Marijuana
- legalized

Opioids
- criminalized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Video: Unsanctioned Hoping to be policed

A
  • toronto
  • pop up supervised injection sites for overdose prevention
  • naloxone to prevent overdose
  • fentanyl overdose increased
  • injection sites actually illegal and could be shut down by police
  • illegal because there is a delay in getting a sanctioned site opened, in attempt to save lives earlier they broke the law and opened this popup site
  • considered innovative, “extraordinary” because the actions that need to be taken are illegal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“Losing the uphill battle?”

Article

A

Politics and policies need to be more receptive to and encourage:

  1. ## Innovation and experimentation
  2. Harm reduction
  3. Addressing social-structural factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“Losing the uphill battle?”

Article

A

Politics and policies need to be more receptive to and encourage 3 things :
- separates politics (politicians receptiveness and encouragement) and policies (laws, legislation)

  1. Innovation and experimentation
    - innovation is creating new ideas to try rather than policing and war on drugs to see new solutions
    - being experimental to try the new ideas and test them out, and then measure it… ex. pop up site, does it work? do we want to continue it?
    - difficult to be experimental if there is fear of intervention of the CJS
  2. Harm reduction
    - there is tons of harm
    - focused first is reducing the harm (fewer over doses, fewer deaths related to overdose, etc)
  3. Addressing social-structural factors
    - economic factors, CJS factors, etc
    - not only locating the issues to the individual who is using the drugs, but also to find the innovative/experimental solutions to reduce harm at a social structural level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Article - “Losing the uphill battle?”

A

Politics and policies need to be more receptive to and encourage 3 things :
- separates politics (politicians receptiveness and encouragement) and policies (laws, legislation)

  1. Innovation and experimentation
    - innovation is creating new ideas to try rather than policing and war on drugs to see new solutions
    - being experimental to try the new ideas and test them out, and then measure it… ex. pop up site, does it work? do we want to continue it?
    - difficult to be experimental if there is fear of intervention of the CJS
  2. Harm reduction
    - there is tons of harm
    - focused first is reducing the harm (fewer over doses, fewer deaths related to overdose, etc)
  3. Addressing social-structural factors
    - economic factors, CJS factors, etc
    - not only locating the issues to the individual who is using the drugs, but also to find the innovative/experimental solutions to reduce harm at a social structural level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

4 harm reduction interventions

A
  1. Naloxone distribution programs
    - Make life-saving medication widely/universally available
    - medication to save lives needs to be readily accessible
    - but it is cost prohibitive which needs to be addressed
  2. Injectable opioid agonist treatment (I-OAT)
    - Prescribe (safe) opioids (=no street drugs)
    - intervention that medical institutions prescribe a similar drug to the addiction, to meet the craving the body desires, but the prescription is safe because its not unregulated (not cooked elsewhere, not laced)
    - measure to get rid of street drugs
    - other potential benefits, the drug itself is safer because they are used for other medical reasons
  3. Overdose prevention sites (OPS)
    - Low-budget, pop-up supervised consumption site
    - often pop-up which means temporary, out door tent(s), supervised by volunteers
    - supervised which offers benefits, supervisors are from the medical community and can prevent overdoses
    - beginning now to open sanctioned sites or request for them across Canada
    - BC declared a state of emergency and now have sanctioned permanent prevention sites
  4. Drug checking services
    - Analyze drugs for foreign substances
    - not only supervised consumption, but now also safe consumption because they are checking for lacing
    -
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Perceptions of risk and safety within injections settings

A
  • Injection sites (temporary or permanent) are used to reduce health risks AND “everyday forms of risk”
  • Safety and Risk
    1. Health
  • overdose prevention
    2. Hygiene
  • clean needles, safe clean place to inject,
    3. Violence
  • safe from violence
    4. Law
  • safe from criminal justice system
  • no fear to hide from surveillance and apprehension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How Harm Reduction Interventions reduce Health-Related Risks

A

Reduce blood-borne viruses

  • Sterile syringes and paraphernalia to prevent viruses
  • Clean (where you are injecting is clean)
  • Segregation, safe & by yourself, less at risk from attack (violence) and any health risks, no chance of mixing drugs

Over-dose

  • Supervised so they can watch for overdose & health hazards
  • Naloxone provided to save life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How Harm Reduction Interventions reduce “everyday forms of risk”

A

Clean, warm, no cost environment

  • not using an abandoned building or unsafe setting like back lanes
  • no worry of weather (Canadian winters)

Safe from attack and robbery

Sanctioned

  • No charges
  • No confiscation

No public exposure

  • takes away risks for the community/public, especially young people
  • users don’t want to be using out in the street and visible to the public
  • reduces many harms by providing a safe place for them to use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Video - Site had to cut back on services after not receiving money from the province (APTN)

A
  • Prairie harm reduction safe consumption site in Saskatoon
  • no provincial funding they were depending on
  • help from community partnerships allowed them to finally open
  • more difficulties with covid-19 (delayed opening, now have to implement social distancing measures)
  • overdoses have increased since covid (230 overdose deaths in first 8 months of 2020)
  • Measurement of harm reduction: are needles on the streets or are they now reduced because of measured implemented?
  • health: cleanliness, aerosol
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Article - Illicit and prescription drug problems among urban Aboriginal adults in Canada

A
  • there are more aboriginal adults now living in urban settings than anywhere else (moved from rural and reserves) - high / over-represented drug use among aboriginal adults who live in urban settings
  • how do we reduce this harm???
  • there is a need for enculturation!!! (specifically in aboriginal adults living in urban settings!)
  • Enculturation: the degree to which Aboriginal people identify with, feel a sense of pride for, and integrate the values and norms of their Aboriginal heritage culture
  • there is an inverse relationship between enculturation and drug usage, as enculturation goes up, drug use goes down. as enculturation decreases then drug use increases
  • Enculturation inversely associated with illicit drug use
  • Enculturation inversely associated with prescription drug use
  • Enable & encourage Indigenous identity & traditions in cities
  • as aboriginals have moved into urban settings they have lost some of their culture, a disassociation
  • reintegration of the culture with reduce the drug use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Belonging and connection - in relation to aboriginals and drug usage

A
  • Lack of social integration in urban, settler-colonial societies (as aboriginal people move into canadian cities), losing a connection to their own communities, the city is a very different cultural place, so they lose their own culture and social bonds, and they don’t gain a lot of the social connection/bonds in settler colonial societies
  • leads to lots of pain and discomfort
  • Addictive behaviours to adapt to pain to deal with the pain & harm
  • solution is re-connecting to Indigenous culture is a social integration (finding our communities)
  • answer to ultimately reducing this type of drug use - reconnection to their culture, we need to do a better job of providing room for aboriginal culture so they can maintain their integration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Types of social norms

A

Folkway

  • norms that stem from and organize casual interactions
  • informal, tell us how to interact with each other, they also come out out of casual interactions
  • symbolic interaction in casual settings are folkways

More

  • norms that structure the difference between right and wrong
  • shape our morals and ethics
  • as a culture what we agree as right/wrong, good/bad

Taboo

  • strong negative norm, violating it results in extreme disgust
  • often main emotion is disgust
  • taboos around many things, ex. related to food is that you wouldn’t eat meat raw like pork and if you did you would illicit disgust
  • negative reaction to something you absolutely don’t do

Law

  • norm that is formally inscribed at the state or federal level
  • laws are nothing more than norms that get codified (written into code at state level)
  • could be a folkway, more, or taboo, and decided as a society/state to be a formal norm where violation leads to sanctions
  • attended through CJS
24
Q

Violation of Norms

A

violation of laws
- crimes (also a type of deviance)

violation of folkway, more, taboo
- deviance (not crimes)

25
Q

Sanctions

A
  • sanctions are reactions to behaviour/actions

Informal Sanction

  • not a process or policy
  • positive informal: an expression of thanks, liking something on social media, etc (positive reinforcement of following good norms)
  • negative informal: an angry comment (negative reinforcement)

Formal Sanction

  • has a process/ procedure or policy
  • positive formal: a promotion at work, or a positive comment on a review website because its recorded feedback (pos reinforcement)
  • negative formal: a parking fine, demotion at work, getting written up, speeding ticket (neg reinforcement)
26
Q

Deviance

A

“A violation of established contextual, cultural, or social norms, whether folkways, mores, or codified law” (Little et al, 2016, p. 299)

27
Q

Crime

A

“an act of deviance that breaks not only a norm, but a law” (Little et al, 2016, p. 300)

28
Q

A typology of deviant acts

A
  1. Consensus crime
    - Agreement of the norm: high agreement
    - Severity of societal response (subjective): severe
    - Evaluation of social harm (objective): very harmful
  2. Conflict crime
    - Agreement of the norm: high disagreement
    - Severity of societal response: moderate
    - Evaluation of social harm: somewhat harmful
  3. Social deviations
    - Agreement of the norm: high disagreement
    - Severity of societal response: moderate
    - Evaluation of social harm: somewhat harmful
  4. Social diversions
    - Agreement of the norm: confusion or apathy
    - Severity of societal response: mild
    Evaluation of social harm: relatively harmless
29
Q

Video - Media

A
  • media has tremendous affect on our lives and the decision we make
  • media misrepresents statistics based on crime (ex. over represents people of colour)
30
Q

Types of media coverage

A

National media
- doesn’t cover a lot of crime unless its a significant event that captivates the nations attention

Local media

  • covers most crime news
  • types include tv news, newspapers, online journals (web based media), etc.

Web-based media

  • online
  • blogs, microblogs (twitter), similar to columns/editorials as they don’t have to be factual, gives an illusion of authenticity/authority/fact

Hard news

  • as it is happening
  • person on street hears reporting of what is currently going on
  • “breaking news”

Soft news

  • after the fact
  • feel good stories
  • follow up stories on something that was previously hard news

Columns/Editorials

  • not necessarily journalistic
  • opinion pieces
  • does not have to be factual , no journalistic investigation
31
Q

Accelerated reality of news

A
  1. Internet
  2. 24-hour news cycle
  3. Social media
  • contributes to accelerated news
  • from the business of media, always something fresh
  • issues with this = less journalistic integrity, less fact checking, news will report tweets/insta posts
  • news wants to be sensationalized
  • has effects on our understanding of crime, 1. presenting in a sensational way, 2. presenting the more sensationalized stories
  • increased coverage of violent crimes, news = 50% violent crime coverage when violent crime only makes up 6% of overall crime, huge overrepresentation
32
Q

Focus of media on crime

A
  • Unique
  • Sensational
  • Extreme
  • Stranger danger
  • almost always presented in terms on an unknown threat to make us scared, which makes it all of these elements
  • makes us think we are under threat and should be fearful of various things, when crime is actually steadily decreasing
  • But rarely domestic violence, partner assault, & sexual assault
  • most violence is committed by someone we know (approx. 80%), the people we should be worried about and attending to
33
Q

Counting Crime

A

Crime Rates

  • (𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠)/𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 × 100,000 (rate per 100,000)
  • Incidents taken from UCR - data base fed from police reports, which means that anything which is not reported is not recorded
  • All incidents are equal, including theft s murder
  • gives us an overall idea but does not specify the severity

Crime Severity Index (CSI)

  • (# 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 × 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡)/𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
  • factors in the amount of harm, the severity of the crime
34
Q

Statistics

Victimization (2014 GSS)

A

Violent victimization 35%

  • Sexual assault 10%
  • Robbery 3%
  • Physical assault 22%

Theft of personal property 34%
- not stolen from household

Household victimization 32%

  • Break & enter 7%
  • Motor vehicle theft 4%
  • Theft of household property 12%
  • Vandalism 9%
35
Q

Amount of crime on UCR from 1962-2019

A
  • since 1992, sharp decline in all types of crime
  • since about 2012/2013-2017, slight increase in crimes (majority related to property crimes) but even then still way better off than previously crime rates
36
Q

Crime Severity Index CSI 2019

A
  • same trends
  • decrease for many years of crime
  • since 2015, slight uptick but not a lot, can be accounted for by increases in fraud, child porn, uttering threats, mischief, sexual assault level 1, shoplifting under 5K
  • recent data, now trending back down again, may be aided by pandemic, most crimes since pandemic are property crimes
37
Q

Summarize theoretical explanations of criminal behavior

A
  • mp ch ques
38
Q

Theoretical models

A
  • crime prevention models
Crime Control
Justice
Welfare
Community Change
Restorative Justice
39
Q

Get-tough approach

A

Punishment & deterrence approach

  • justice model
  • crime control model
  • these 2 models use punishment and deterrence as an approach to crime & crime prevention
  • get tough approaches do not really reduce crime, the idea that the result of punishment would prevent people from doing crimes, but research shows that it actually doesn’t work to limit behaviour
  • ex. war on drugs
40
Q

Public Health Approach

A

Treatment & Rehabilitation

  • Welfare
  • Community Change
  • Restorative Justice
41
Q

Public Health Approach

A

Treatment & Rehabilitation

Welfare

  • seeks to rehabilitate the person who was in conflict with the law
  • recognizes the need that the person is missing, does the person need skills training to get a job?
  • seek to rehabilitate at the microlevel, localized to the person in trouble with the law ex. fix family relationships

Community Change

  • seeks to rehabilitate the community/society
  • what we need to fix isn’t the person who stole the bread, its the community that allows the person who goes hungry
  • would want to have more social workers in the community to help with addictions, family problems, etc
  • resources needed within the community before the person reaches prison

Restorative Justice

  • seeks to rehabilitate the relationship between the person who commit the offence, the victim, and the community
  • if the victim was harmed, what can we do to make them okay
  • rehabilitate the relationship between each factor
  • symbiotic approach to restore the harmony
42
Q

Target risk factors

A
Substance abuse
Pro-criminal attitudes
Anti-social personality
Pro-criminal associates
Education/employment
Family/marital relationships
Leisure/recreation
Criminal history
  • by reducing a risk factor may be able to reduce other factors as well
43
Q

5 strategies for reducing crime

A
  1. Reducing Poverty
  2. Male socialization
  3. Early childhood intervention
  4. Improved schools and schooling
  5. Community corrections
44
Q

Ch. 7.1

A
  • Drug use has been common since ancient times.
  • Alcohol was widely drunk in colonial America. During the latter nineteenth century, opium, marijuana,
    and cocaine were legal drugs that were also widely used.
  • Racial prejudice played an important role in decisions during the late nineteenth century and early
    twentieth century to ban opium, marijuana, and cocaine.
45
Q

Ch. 7.2

A
  • The distinction between legal drugs and illegal drugs has no logical basis; legal drugs cause much more
    harm than illegal drugs.
  • Alcohol and tobacco kill more than 500,000 Americans annually. Binge drinking on campuses results in
    accidents and assaults involving several hundred thousand college students annually.
  • Marijuana is by far the most commonly used illegal drug. The low prevalence of other illegal drugs still
    amounts to millions of people using these drugs annually.
46
Q

Ch. 7.3

A
  • Drug use is socially patterned: Aspects of our sociodemographic backgrounds affect our likelihood of
    using various drugs.
  • Perhaps the clearest social pattern involves gender, with males more likely than females to use and abuse
    alcohol, tobacco, and illegal drugs.
  • Despite common beliefs, the rate of illegal drug use is lower for African Americans than for whites.
47
Q

Ch. 7.4

A
  • Biological theories assume that some people are especially vulnerable to drug addiction for genetic
    reasons.
  • A popular set of psychological theories assumes that drug addiction results from certain personality traits
    and problems.
  • Sociological theories attribute drug use to various aspects of the social environment, including peer
    influences, weak social bonds, and the larger drug culture.
48
Q

Ch. 7.5

A
  • To deal with drugs, the United States has used several strategies, including treatment, prevention, harm
    reduction, and the legal war on illegal drugs.
  • According to its critics, the war on illegal drugs has done much more harm than good and in this respect is
    repeating the example of Prohibition.
49
Q

Ch. 7.6

A
  • Critics of the war on drugs say that people who use illegal drugs should be treated, not arrested, just as
    people who use alcohol and tobacco are treated, if they seek treatment, rather than arrested.
  • Specific measures that could help address the drug problem include providing legally prescribed heroin or
    substitute opiates for heroin addicts and raising the alcohol tax.
50
Q

Ch. 8.1

A
  • Much of the American public is concerned about crime, and many people worry about becoming a victim
    of various types of crime.
  • The news media overdramatize the nature and amount of crime, and they give more attention to crimes
    involving African Americans and Latinos as offenders and whites as victims.
  • The nation’s major source of crime data is the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR). However, many people do
    not report their crimes to the police, and police practices affect the number of “official” crimes reported
    by the UCR.
51
Q

Ch. 8.2

A
  • Most homicides are committed for relatively emotional, spontaneous reasons and between people who
    knew each other beforehand.
  • White-collar crime involves more death, injury, and economic loss than street crime, but the punishment
    of white-collar crime is relatively weak.
  • Consensual crime raises two related issues: (a) To what extent should the government prohibit people
    from engaging in behavior in which there are no unwilling victims, and (b) do laws against consensual
    crime do more good than harm or more harm than good?
52
Q

Ch. 8.3

A
  • Males commit more street crime than females, in part because of gender role socialization that helps
    make males more assertive and aggressive.
  • Young people commit a disproportionate amount of street crime, in part because of the influence of their
    peers and their lack of stakes in conformity.
  • The disproportionate involvement of African Americans and Latinos in street crime arises largely from
    their poverty and urban residence.
53
Q

Ch. 8.4

A
  • Social structure theories stress that crime results from economic and other problems in how society is
    structured and from poverty and other problems in neighborhoods.
  • Interactionist theories stress that crime results from our interaction with family members, peers, and
    other people, and from labeling by the criminal justice system.
  • Conflict theories stress that social groups with power and influence try to use the law and criminal justice
    system to maintain their power and to keep other groups at the bottom of society.
54
Q

Ch. 8.5

A
  • Partly because the police often fear for their lives, they tend to have a “working personality” that is
    authoritarian and suspicious. Police corruption and use of undue force remain significant problems in
    many police departments.
  • Although criminal defendants have the right to counsel, the legal representation of such defendants,
    most of whom are poor or near poor, is very inadequate.
  • Prisons are squalid places, and incarceration has not been shown to reduce crime in an effective or costefficient
    manner.
  • Most criminologists agree that capital punishment does not deter homicide, and they worry about racial
    discrimination in the use of the death penalty and about the possibility of wrongful executions.
55
Q

Ch. 8.6

A
  • The get-tough approach has not been shown to reduce crime in an effective and cost-efficient manner. A
    sociological explanation of crime thus suggests the need to focus more resources on the social roots of
    crime in order to prevent crime from happening in the first place.
  • Strategies suggested by criminologists to reduce crime include (a) reducing poverty and improving
    neighborhood living conditions, (b) changing male socialization patterns, (c) expanding early childhood
    intervention programs, (d) improving schools and schooling, and (e) reducing the use of incarceration for
    drug and property offenders.