Test 3 Lecture Notes so far Flashcards
a technique for identifying the major personality and behavioural characteristics of an individual based on the analysis of the crimes he or she has committed
criminal profiling
profiling is getting info about the suspect when you don’t have ____
witnesses
are profilers only used to catch the perp?
no, sometimes they are hired to find a motive even when you have someone in custody
what do we need in order to develop a profile
consecutive crimes
what types of crimes/ppl are usually profiled?
Why?
serial killers and serial rapists
- The anticipation of it happening again is why you develop a profile
- Fear of escalation
○ Also there is an investment in the profiling - costs money
(Wouldn’t do this for one offs)
when does criminal profiling date back to? How do we know this?
Dates back to 15th century (1400s)
With the book “Malleus Maleficarum”
Explain:
- what Malleus Maleficarm is
- who the authors were
- what authority the authors had
- what did it contain?
- what it was used for?
Book that tells us about witches and how to find them
Authors by themselves had no authority, but pope gave them an official document that ‘verified’ they were inquisitors
contained profile of witches:
strong personality, does not cry at trial
cause all damage In town (prevents conception, baby deaths, life stalk injuries, storms, etc._
Used in the Salem witch trials (17th century)
who developed the profile of Jack the Ripper? How did they do this
Dr. Phillips and Dr. Bond
they investigated victims, crime scenes, and wounds
who was jack the ripper and what did he do
murderer
- generally targeted prostitutes on London streets
- brutal murders committed in public
- was never caught
who profiled jack the ripper and what did their profile contain?
Dr. Phillips and Dr. Bond
- quiet and harmless looing
- wore a cloak
- probably promiscuous or hypersexual
- neat and clean looking
what is the profile that is referred to when justifying profiling in the first place
the mad bomber
describe what the mad bomber do
- Starting planting bombs around New York City - planted 333, 22 exploded
-Ones that didn’t explode had some problems with them - Ppl were terrified
• Looks like he actually tried to avoid injury ppl but more so destroy property and ensue terror
• Notes on Unexploded bombs about Con Edison - Power company complaining
• Brief stop during WWII, he wrote a note to newspaper about this - made larger and larger bombs (escalation)
- mostly after the war he escalated
what were some not-obvious things about the profile of the mad bomber by Dr. James
§ Not interested in women
§ Suffered from heart disease
§ When you catch him he will be wearing like a double-breasted suit, buttoned
who is the man called the mad bomber? describe him
George mateski
- old employee at a power company
- had a disease
- was 54
- paranoid
- military
- loner
- foreigner
- catholic
- not interested in women
where are the profiling jobs in canada
only really at the national level
criticisms of profiling: trait model
- cases based on classic trait model but sometimes there are traits we don’t see in the crime. Perhaps the person has multiple personalities
- trait models don’t work day to day
- weather analogy: trait models are like climate models that don’t tell you the day-to-day weather
if crimes are committed only when the weather is bad then you’re gonna have a hard time finding the perp based on the trait model
criticism of profiling: applicable info and expertise
- sometimes the info in a profile is so vague anyone could say that profile fits them
- sometimes it is thought that profilers don’t have any more expertise than a bartender or a psychic
who is the amazing randy?
Amazing Randy
- magician who taught ppl the tricks
- did a thing:
- gave personal astrology profiles to all students in a class with their name on it
- asked: read and raise your hand if it applies to you
-about 2/3 of ppl raised their hand
then students were asked to put profile back in envelope and pass it back, and read the new one you receive
- everyone started laughing bc all the envelopes had the same profile in them
What was the study by Kocsis et al (2000)
Investigated whether criminal profilers were good at developing profiles
- comparison groups: psychologists, police officers, students, psychics
- all groups given the report of an assault case, forensic biologist info, basic victim info, photos and then were told to develop a profile using a 45 item MP questionnaire so they were all of same detail
also given an adjective checklist (ACL) describing the offender
results: all scores fairly similar, profilers slightly slightly better but overall, no group was very good
How to become a profiler in Canada
its within the behavioural science branch of the RCMP
- you first have to be a police officer
what is ViCLAS
A database of crimes
- When there is commonality amongst the crimes - they check where they are - to see if there is a serial offender travelling the country
- there are ViCLAS specialiststhat look at the data
- Started in Canada but now a lot of other countries use this
- Isn’t of making clinical judgements they can make statistical ones
- Some ppl argue this database should be provided to scientistsso further research can be done with this kind of data no scientist has had access to in the past
How its done:
- Once a crime is solved, a separate questionnaire about the offender is filled out and filed linked to the offences
- RCMP refuses to license it to other countries to do this, and doesn’t allow us to do this
What are the class of sex assault? What are the sentences?
Class 1 - minor injuries or no injuries - indecent exposure Class 1 Sentence: - maxes at 10 yeas - sometimes given summary offence (max 2 years)
Class 2
- sexual assault with a weapon, threats or causing bodily harm
Class 2 Sentence: Max 14 years
Class 3: Aggravated sex assault
- results in wounding, maiming, disfiguring or endangering life of victim
- Class 3: Sentence
- max is life in prison
What is the SAQ? What was the result of “experts”
Sex Assault Questionnaire
- used in university settings to assess the knowledge of security officers at the universities
- they found knowledge to be profoundly lacking
- campus police in US averaged 11/18 (just a bit more than guessing which was the average of non-experts)