Test 3 (lec 14-21) Flashcards

1
Q

Air Pollutants

A

Airborne substances (gases,
particulates or biological matter) released into the
atmosphere, deliberately or inadvertently, from
natural or anthropogenic sources that have the potential to harm human health and the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Major concerns for air pollution

A

human health effects of smog, acidification of surface waters, crop and forest damage and damage to built
structures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how many people are estimated to be exposed to dangerous levels of air pollution

A

2.4 billion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of Air pollutants

A

Gases, Aerosols, Particulates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Aerosols examples

A

sulphates, fine droplets of organic
material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Particulates examples

A

soot (carbon); various oxides and
salts of metals and other inorganics; chemical
mixtures of particles with organic substances
adsorbed onto them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Air pollution risk management

A
  • Long range goals to decrease ozone concentrations in air
  • Emission controls for vehicles
  • Control orders for certain industries
  • Warnings – susceptible persons to avoid exposure (smog advisories)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Air sampling

A

involves collecting an air sample over a period of time that is then sent to a laboratory for analysis to
identify and quantify specific compounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

air monitoring

A

uses electronic devices to provide real-time
readings of airborne contaminants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

solutions for pharmaceuticals

A

Reduce sources of pharmaceuticals to
environment

Main solution is to reduce levels in
treated sewage before release

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PPCPs

A

pharmaceuticals and personal care products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PFAs

A

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. highly used in commercial products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what has a very long residence time! Strongest bond in organic chemistry

A

PFAs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how to predict PFA risk

A

literature review and Toxicity tests conducted in a laboratory and in the field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Toxicant effects at the individual level can be differentiated into
what two forms

A

lethal and sub-lethal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Contaminant lethality can be divided into what two groups

A

acute lethality, chronic lethality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

acute lethality

A

death followed by exposure within 96 hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

chronic lethality

A

death followed by prolonged exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

3 shortcomings of behavioural toxicology

A
  1. Some behaviours are hard to score
  2. High variability in some behaviours
  3. Hard to extrapolate from lab to wild
    settings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

disadvantages of conventional toxicity tests

A

time consuming, costly, needs high numbers of test organisms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

novel approach methods

A

Defined as any technology, methodology, approach, or combination that informs chemical
hazard and risk assessment method

22
Q

replacement novel approach method

A

Methods which avoid or replace the use of animals

23
Q

refinement novel approach method

A

Methods which minimize suffering and improve animal welfare

24
Q

reduction novel approach method

A

Methods which minimize the number of animals used per experiment

25
Q

Ecotoxicogenomics

A

Study of gene and protein expression using –omics technology
to understand the effects of environmental contaminants

26
Q

Omics technology

A

◦ Transcriptomic- study of gene expression levels
◦ Proteomics- study of protein expression levels
◦ Metabolomics- study of metabolites within organisms

27
Q

benefits of Ecotoxicogenomics

A

Enhances toxicity data (toxicity mechanisms)

Reduces suffering of organisms (shorter test duration)

Compatible with in vitro systems

28
Q

PFAS exposure can lead to what

A

endocrine disruption, decrease in immune response, oxidative stress

29
Q

Water pollution impacts from pulp and paper production

A
  • Oxygen consuming substances
  • Toxic chemicals (Hg, chlorinated compounds, wood extractives)
  • Persistent bioaccumulative compounds
30
Q

Physical changes to lakes and rivers from pulp and paper production

A
  • Dams
  • Log floating, physical damage to benthic habitats
  • Water consumption for processing
31
Q

potential by-products or waste from pulp or paper

A
  • Sugars (= energy)
  • Lignin (= glue)
  • Extractives
  • Tall Oil (fatty acids)
  • Turpentine (alcohols, phenolics)
  • Resin Acids
  • Phytosterols
32
Q

Lignin degradation by pulping and bleaching creates what

A

toxic phenolics and polyphenolics

33
Q

characteristics of Chlorine,
hypochlorous acid pulp bleaching

A
  • Very efficient, not much fibre breakage
  • generates chlorinated compounds;
  • abandoned in the early 1990’s (crisis of
    chlorinated dioxins in fish & shellfish )
34
Q

new pulp mill impacts after 1980s

A

eutrophication due to nutrient enrichment from waste treatment

35
Q

ultimate goal for pulp and paper process

A

zero discharge, closed loop mill (re-use water)

36
Q

solutions for pulp and paper process

A

Instead of end-of-pipe solutions, improve the
pulping and bleaching processes

37
Q

challenges for improving pulp and paper process

A

remove chemicals from effluents without increasing
toxicity, creating solid waste, or releasing air pollutants

38
Q

components of wood (good, bad, ugly)

A

– The good: Cellulose (wood fibre used for paper and box board)
– The bad: Phenolics from lignin
– The ugly: Extractives (resins & fatty acids, phytosterols)

39
Q

paper bleaching

A

produces white paper by chemical oxidation to remove lignin, but….
– Chlorine bleaching generates persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) chemicals
– Chlorine production results in Hg release and environmental Hg methylation

40
Q

Impacts of pulp mill effluents on aquatic ecosystems

A

oxygen depletion, bioaccumulation of PBTs, degraded fisheries

41
Q

Brownfields

A

Abandoned, idle, or underutilized commercial
or industrial properties where past activities
have caused known or suspected
contamination, but where there is an active
potential for redevelopment

42
Q

Brownfields positive attributes

A
  • Location in urban areas
  • Sites preferred over Greenfield development
  • Arteries – roads, rail, water
  • Municipal services in place
  • Possible heritage interest
43
Q

Brownfields negative attributes

A
  • Depress local property values
  • Catalyst for poor property standards, loss of
    community pride
  • Human health & environmental risks
  • Loss of tax revenues
  • Cost to clean up and redevelop
44
Q

Human health and environmental risks of brownfields

A

– Risk from immediate exposure to contaminates soil
(plants, animals, humans)
– Risk from substances moving from soil to ground or surface water

45
Q

brownfields incentives

A
  • Allow a municipality to direct funds and implement
    policy initiatives toward a specifically defined project
    area
  • Intended to encourage rehabilitation initiatives and/or
    stimulate development
  • Once implemented, the plan allows municipalities to
    provide tax assistance, grants or loans to assist in the
    rehabilitation of lands and/or buildings within the
    defined Community Improvement Project Area
46
Q

ecotoxicology

A
  • The study of chemical effects in ecosystems and natural
    communities
  • Seeks to understand relationships among the structures of
    chemicals, their environmental behaviour, distribution, and
    effects on species of interest
47
Q

why waste-to-energy?

A

Removes or greatly reduces the need for landfill sites, avoiding potential
problems down the road
Reduces the need for waste treatment (i.e. sewage and other solids in
wastewater)
Reduces our footprint on natural resources – by utilizing waste, we avoid
using a renewable or fossil resource
Reduces costs – companies may avoid paying for feedstocks or disposal
costs

48
Q

criteria for success of waste-to-energy

A

Technically sound approach
Environmentally sustainable (low GHG emisssions)
Economical (efficient use of fuel, acceptable per unit cost)
Safe, reliable operations
Small footprint and attractive design
‐ Must be acceptable to communities where power is needed, to reduce
transmission & distribution losses
Simple, quick permitting process

49
Q

what do waste-to-energy systems focus on

A

normally organics (biomass),Plastics may also be a good source
of energy – while they are petroleum
based, disposal of these products
has been difficult

50
Q

problem with combusting plastics

A

Combusting plastic without proper controls
can result in increased CO2, but also the
production of dioxins, furans, heavy metals
(e.g. mercury) and polychlorinated biphenyls

51
Q

design principles for complete combustion

A
  1. Temperatures must be very high and/or residence times must be very
    long in order to ensure that all material is reduced to constituent gases
    (CO, CO2, CH4, H2) as well as trace elements
  2. Trace elements, including heavy metals, must be recovered and
    disposed of separately – this can be done by separating slag
  3. Proper monitoring and reporting is required to ensure that plants are
    operated with a minimal impact on the surrounding environment
52
Q

why is there municipal reluctance

A
  1. Municipalities not eager to sign up for long-term contracts
  2. Communities highly concerned about the potential pollutants involved in
    combustion of waste streams
  3. Many new technologies and players – difficult to know what the winner is
  4. Very difficult to validate performance, particularly for small communities