Test 3 Flashcards
Power
the potential to influence another person
based on dependencies of followers (control something they want)
it is neutral (can be perceived as good or bad) and can be exercised upward, downward or laterally
Authority
the right to influence another person
Influence
the process of affecting the behaviors, thoughts, and feelings of another person
Five Bases of Power
Reward, Coercive, Legitimate, Referent and Expert
Reward
we comply because it provides positive benefits for us (formal/position)
Coercive
threat, embarrass, withhold information from subordinates (formal)
Legitimate
accepted as powerful due to rules/guidelines (formal)
Referent
look up to someone because of their qualities (personal)
Expert
knowledge/experience on topic gives them power (personal)
Personal vs. Formal Power
personal power was found to be more effective
Criteria for Use of Power
Does the behavior produce a good outcome for both people inside and outside the organization?
Does the behavior respect the rights of all parties?
Does the behavior treat all parties equitably and fairly?
Ethical Guidelines for Reward Power
make reasonable, ethical requests; offer desired, credible awards
Ethical Guidelines for Coercive Power
warn before punishing, punish consistently and uniformly, maintain credibility, and inform subordinates of all rules/penalties
Ethical Guidelines for Legitimate Power
be cordial and confident, make appropriate, explainable requests, follow proper channels and exercise power consistently, enforce compliance
Ethical Guidelines for Referent Power
defend subordinates’ interest, be sensitive to needs/feelings, engage in role modeling and treat everyone fairly
Ethical Guidelines for Expert Power
maintain credibility, avoid threatening subordinates’ self-esteem, keep informed and act confident and decisively
Sanctioned Influence Tactics
Legitimacy Rational Persuasion Inspirational appeals (build enthusiasm) Consultation (participation) Exchange (trading favors) Personal Appeals (asking others for support) Ingratiating (influencing others to like us) Pressure Coalition (pooling resources)
Non-sanctioned Influence Tactics
Intimidation Threats Coercion Manipulation Misrepresentation Minimizing other's contribution Blaming
Political Behavior
activities that are not required as part of one’s formal role in the organization, but influence the distribution of advantages within the organization
Causes of Political Behavior
Individual factors: personality, expectations for success, locus of control
Organizational factors: resources, trust, promotion opportunities, performance evaluation system, decision making process
Consequences of Political Behavior
decreased job satisfaction, increased anxiety and stress, increased turnover, reduced performance
Political Skill
how good you are at playing politics impression management (process by which individuals attempt to control impressions others form of them) Apparent sincerity, social astuteness; interpersonal influence; networking ability
Ways to Manage Organizational Politics
competence political skill, powerful coalitions strong sponsorship stay positive make others feel valued
Empowerment
the process by which managers help others to acquire and use the power needed to make decisions affecting themselves and their work
assume power is not zero-sum and social power is unlimited
the more power you give away, the more you have
Functional vs. Dysfunctional Conflict
Functional: supports the goals of the group and improves its performance (fuller debate, more creative ideas, increased cohesion)
Dysfunctional: conflict that hinders group performance (wastes time, energy, resources, less productivity, more organizational politics and job dissatisfaction
Three Types of Conflict and their Description
Task: conflict relates to the content/goals
Relationship: conflict based on interpersonal relationships
Process: conflict over how work gets done
Three Loci of Conflict and their Description
Dyadic: between two people
Intragroup: occurs within a group or team
Intergroup: occurs between groups or teams
Conflict Process
Potential Opposition/Incompatibility: communication issues, structure of tasks, personal variables
Cognition and personalization: emotions come into play, define the conflict
Intentions: how do we want to handle this issue
Behavior: dynamic process of interaction (behavior vs. other’s reaction)
Outcomes: functional vs. dysfunctional (increase or decrease performance)
Five Conflict Management Styles and their Description:
Avoiding: take no action and stay out of conflict (uncooperative and unassertive)
Accommodating: concern with party’s goals but unconcerned with getting own way (cooperative, unassertive)
Competing: satisfying own interest at other party’s expense (uncooperative, assertive)
Compromising: each party gives up something to reach a solution (middle)
Collaborating: arriving at a solution through open discussion (cooperative, assertive)