Test 2 Flashcards
Historical Development of Policing in England
(1) Bailiffs and Night Watch
(2) Gun riots in the 18th and 19th Century caused problems
London Metropolitan Police and their goals
(1) Founded By Sir Robert Peel 1829
(2) “The Met”
(3) First Modern Police Force
(4) goals to discourage crime and use preventative patrol
Early American Policing
(1) Colonies were different that Brittan
(2) the frontier had a problem with vigilantism
(3) NY BA PH made their police like the met
the Kansas city experiment
(1) preventative patrol
(2) found no difference in the rate of occurrence of crime or in citizen fear of crime based on amount of patrol
(3) experiment led to new stratiges
federal law enforcement agencies
14 us gov depts 28 non dept agencies conduct criminal invest. execute warrants make arrests carry guns
styles of policing
(1) watchman- uses discretion, informal intervention, order maintenance
(2) legalistic- strict assholes/ hands off on not criminal things
service- servant of community/ helper more than strict
4th amendment
search and seizure
due process
5th amendment
stfu
6th amendment
right to council
exclusionary rule
evidance obtained without cause cant be used in court
exceptions to exclusionary rule
when a search is conducted in good faith its a legal search, the evidance can be used
searches incident to arrest
car searches probable cause stop and frisk incrimination warrant
vehicle searches
warrant
probable cause
suspicionless searches
stop and frisk
informants
protected under law
interrogation
can have council present durring questioning
electronic eavesdropping
warrant needed
types of police corruption
grass eaters- takes bribe when offered
meat eaters- solicits bribes
dangers of police work
most officer are shot with single weapon single offender
stress and fatigue is natural
civil liability/ federal lawsuits
lawsuit against police goes to federal court
police investigations are handled internally
police use of deadly force
rare
must be reasonable force
mapp v ohio
exclusionary rule
escobedo v illinois
interrogation
katz v us
electronic eavesdropping
