Test 2 Flashcards
Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Ended segregation in all public accommodations.
- Argued that there is no hotel that doesn’t deal with interstate commerce
Voting Rights Act of 1965
1) Guaranteed African-Americans the right to vote.
Nat Turner rebellion
Was a slaved who felt called by God to lead a rebellion
- Southerners feared the rebellion, so they treated them badly
Alien and Sedition Act of 1789
Made it a crime to say or publish anything that would “defame or bring into disrepute the government of the United States.”
Suspension of habeus corpus during Civil War
During this time of conflict we have power to arrest people without reason
Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917 and 1918
Made it unlawful by “word or act to oppose the cause of the United States.”
Gitlow v. New York
Gitlow who publishes a communist manifesto and was charged for plotting to overthrow the US gov (red Scare)
Brandenburg V. Ohio (1969
The state may not restrict or punish speech advocating “the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”
- KKK leader, when told to leave the street where they were protesting, said he would come back and “take this fucking street”
New York Times v. Sullivan (1972)
NYT got ahold of papers that showed the US was lying to its citizens.
Speech (Protected v Non-Protected
Protected : i) Political speech ii) Press iii) Symbolic speech
Not Protected : i) obscenity ii) libel iii) Speech that presents clear and present danger
2nd Amendment rights
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
District of Columbia v. Heller
DOC restricted right to keep gun in home unless it was disarmed
- Heller said it was against his 2nd amendment right
- Court sided with Heller with 2nd Amendment
4th 5th and 6th amendments
Balancing the rights of the accused and the state’s interest in public safety and welfare
4th - Non-reasonable searches prohibited
5th - Do not have to witness against yourself
6th - speedy public trial, impartial jury, told accusations, right to lawyer/council of defense
Mapp v. Ohio
Police officers sought a bombing suspect and evidence of the bombing at the petitioner, Miss Mapp’s (the “petitioner”) house. After failing to gain entry on an initial visit, the officers returned with what purported to be a search warrant, forcibly entered the residence, and conducted a search in which obscene materials were discovered. The petitioner was tried and convicted for these materials
- All material was taken under the fourth amendment
Miranda v. Arizona
- The defendants offered incriminating evidence during police interrogations without prior notification of their rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution
- Government authorities need to inform individuals of their Fifth Amendment constitutional rights prior to an interrogation following an arrest.