Test 2 Flashcards
verbal contracts
enforceable
can be difficult to prove
written contracts
clearly lay out terms of the agreement
certain types of contracts MUST be in writing
bilateral contracts
each side makes a promise to do something
“a promise for a promise”
unilateral contract
one party makes a promise that the other party can only accept by doing something
express contract
both parties explicitly state the terms of the contact (can be oral or written)
implied contract
the words and conduct of the parties indicate an agreement even if no words are spoken or written
executory contract
a contract that has been formed, but not yet fully performed by one or more of the parties
executed contract
a contract that has been fully performed by all parties
valid contract
meet all seven of the criteria
unenforceable contracts
parties intend to form a valid contract, but some rule or law forbids enforcement
void contract
contracts that neither party can enforce
treated as if they never existed in the first place
voidable contract
contracts that may be defective, but are still enforceable by the election of one of the parties
criteria for a valid and binding contract
offer acceptance consideration capacity legality genuine consent proper form
offeror
person making the offer
offeree
person to whom the offer is made
ways that an offer can be terminated
outright revocation lapse in time rejection counteroffer destruction of the subject matter
revocation
an offer can be revoked at any time prior to being accepted
rejection
terminate an offer and the offeree then loses the ability to accept unless the offer is put back on the table
counteroffer
reject an offer and put a different offer on the table
acceptance
saying or doing something to accept an offer
the mirror image rule
the acceptance has precisely the same terms as the offer
the mailbox rule
the offer has been accepted once the offeree has “dispatched” it or “placed it in the mail”
consideration
if one side gets all the benefit and the other gets nothing, then an agreement lacks consideration and is not an enforceable contract
money
engagement ring
three rules to consideration
- both parties must get something of measurable value from the contract
- a promise to give something of value counts as consideration
- the two parties must have bargained for whatever was exchanged and struck a deal
gift promises
gratuitous promises are unenforceable because they lack consideration
illegal consideration
a contract cannot be supported by a promise to refrain from doing an illegal act
contracts based on illegal consideration are void
preexisting duties and past consideration
a promise lacks consideration if a person promises to perform an act or do something he or she is already under an obligation to do or act that they have already done
the promise is unenforceable because no new consideration has been given
capacity
the ability to understand the terms of the contract and appreciate that the failure to perform its terms can lead to legal liability
without capacity the contract is voidable
burden to prove incapacity is always on the person asserting the incapacity
minors
the infancy doctrine
the minor still has the duty of restoration meaning that is disaffirmed, the minormust return the goods in the condition they are in at the time of the disaffirmance
obligated to pay for the necessaries of life that they contract for
the infancy doctrine
allows minor to disaffirm (cancel) most contracts that they enter into with adults
ratification
upon reaching the age of majority, the person may also “accept” the contract that they previously entered into as a minor
mentally incompetent people
the law protects people suffering from substantial mental incapacity from enforcement of contracts against them
law requires a person to have been legally insane
legal insanity
a state of contractual incapacity as determined by the law
adjudged insane
judge says you are insane, need to be in a mental hospital
contracts are void
insane, but not adjudged insane
haven’t been in front of a judge
contracts are voidable
who can’t enter into a contract?
drunks
mentally incapacitated
minors
intoxicated person
contracts are voidable
legality
the object of every contract must be lawful
contracts with an illegal object are void and unenforceable
contracts contrary to statutes
contracts contrary to public policy
contracts contrary to statutes
federal and state legislatures have enacted statutes that prohibit certain types of conduct
contracts to perform an activity that is prohibited by statute are illegal
contracts contrary to public policy
contracts that have a negative impact on society or that interfere with the public’s safety and welfare
such contracts are void