Test 2 Flashcards by Anthony Tojek | Brainscape

Q

3rd party consent (clerk)

A

Stoner v California

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

3rd party consent (warrant)

A

Bumper v North Carolina

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Consent search on a bus

A

Florida v Bostick

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

3rd party consent (co-owner/good faith)

A

Illinois v Rodriguez

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Manipulation of objects

A

Arizona v Hicks

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Incorporation of exclusionary rule

A

Mapp v Ohio

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Fruit of the poisonous tree

A

Nix v Williams

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Capital cases right to counsel

A

Powell v Alabama

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Special circumstances right to counsel

A

Betts v Brady

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Felony cases right to counsel

A

Gideon v Wainwright

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Misdemeanor cases right to counsel

A

Argersinger v Hamlin

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Ineffective counsel standards

A

Strictland v Washington

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Ethical constraints on lawyers

A

Nix v Whiteside

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Self-representation

A

Farretta v California

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Right to counsel

A

Douglas v California

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly