test 2 Flashcards
income inequality impacts political democracy: Aristotle (4)
- extreme income inequalities in society could lead to political instability and revolution
- extreme equality could lead to political instability and revolution
- the most stable political system occurs when income inequality is modest
- political stability would exist if a middle-class state was established (the democratic state)
income inequality impact political democracy: James Harrington (2)
the distribution of land or resources influences the distribution of power (power follows property)
1. if resources are widely distributed among the people, a popular government will follow
2. if resources are not widely distributed, then a non-popular (autocratic) government will follow
income inequality impacts political democracy: Robert Dahl (2)
income inequalities will affect political institutions in two major ways:
1. extreme income inequalities would lead to hegemonic (or authoritarian) regimes
2. income inequalities in polyarchies could also lead to group resentments and frustrations
greater income inequalties in polyarchies have not led to change in regime for a few reasons (3)
- demands for greater income equality may be diffused if a regime responds to some part of the demands
- a group may believe it is now better off than it was in the past though some other groups are far better off
- a group may attenuate its resentment if it believes the country is moving toward a more just condition
democracy impacts income equality: Gerald Lenski (2)
- democratic ideology legitimizes a major diffusion of political power in favor of the masses
- diffusion of political power leads to more social equality due to redistribution of income and resources
democracy-income inequality non-relationship: Clark Kerr et al. (2)
- industrialization shapes both the distribution of income and democracy
- any observed association between the two variables is spurious or false
income inequality influences or affect democracy: Bruce Russett (3)
- argues Plato and Marx saw private property as the cause of political instability, but not Aristotle and Tocqueville
- Russett’s Hypothesis: equitable land distribution influences democracy
- finding: stable democracies had a more equitable land distribution than authoritarian ones
Edward Muller (2)
- hypothesis: higher income inequality was related to the reversal of new democracies in Latin America in the 1960s-1980s
- claimed his empirical test supported his hypotheses
reason for initial increase in income of the upper class
business elites became relatively wealthy due to rapid growth during the early industrialization era
reasons for downward trend of the income of the upper class (3)
- service-based economy would disperse economic benefits to groups other than the upper class
- the upper class will likely face competition from new entrepreneurs
- public laws would discourage the concentration of savings in the hands of the upper class
Democracy influences income equality: Christopher Hewitt (2)
hypotheses:
1. the more experience a country has with a democracy, the higher the income equality; the more experience a country has with a socialist democracy the higher the income equality
2. with N=25 countries, he found social democracy, not democracy in general, influences income equality
income inequality-democracy non-relationship: Kenneth Bollen and Robert Jackman (3)
- is there a relationship between income inequality and democracy
- found no statistically significant relationship between the two variables in either direction
- they found that economic development influences both democracy and income equality
Bollen & Jackman criticized others …(2)
- Muller: countries reestablished democracy without a significant change in income inequality
- Jackman also objected to Hewitt’s findings, suggesting that he did not use sound research design (included an outlier country in his sample, leading to a biased finding)
Bollen & Jackman gave support for Clark Kerr et al’s thesis
no causal relationship exists between income inequality and democracy
political culture
values that connect attitudes of individuals with the structure of the political system
Almond and Verba contended there are three types of political cultures…
- parochial
- subject
- participatory
parochial political culture
refers to a condition where citizens are less informed and their political participation is minimal
subject political culture
refers to a condition where citizens’ could be politically informed but are politically passive
participatory political culture
refers to a condition where citizens are politically informed and active
Almond and Verba refer to the best form of political culture as…(2)
civic culture: a mix of parochial, subject, and participatory values
1. civic culture is conducive to democracy
2. political activity in modern democracies can only be modest
Almond and Verba concluded…
US and Great Britain have greater civic culture than the other countries
criticism of Almond and Verba
political culture is not static; it can change over time
Inglehart’s Postmodernization Theory
economic development influences political culture, which, in turn, leads to democracy
how Inglehart differs from modernization theory (4)
- change is not linear; it does not move in one continuous direction until the end of history
- previous versions of modernization theory were deterministic (Marx’s economic determinism and Weber’s cultural determinism)
- modernization is not the same as Westernization
- democracy is not inherent in the modernization phase; alternatives include fascism and communism