Test 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Quantitative data

A

numerical
ex. scales, physiological responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Qualitative data

A

any form other than numbers
ex. words, sounds, images

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

qualitative
1. strengths
2. weaknesses

A
  1. rich in detail, captures human experiences, why people do things
  2. resource intensive, smaller samples (*more generalizability), less agreement on appropriate methods of analyzation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

quantitative
1. strengths
2. weaknesses

A
  1. can use statistics, how often, how much, more agreement on methods
  2. numbers provide limited information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Qualitative data can be transformed into numbers

A

ex. watch a movie, but count number of times things happen
gain use of statistics, but lose potentially important information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Coding schemes

A

a set of rules for turning qualitative to quantitive (rules on how you measure.
*the specificity reduces the measurement error and improves reliability **you need to be specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

qualitative analysis
*perserving detail

A
  1. inductive (be objective)
  2. deductive (go into it having a theory)
  3. thematic analysis (read data and identify common themes)
  4. reflexivity (acknowledging potential bias)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

mixed-methods approach

A

combine qualitative and quantitative
do qualitative + quantitative analysis of qualitative data
ex. get them to rate something, then ask an open-ended question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

correlation studies

A

measure 2 or more variables and how they relate
*naturally occurring, no manipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. positive correlation
  2. negative correlation
  3. Pearson correlation (r)
A
  1. as 1 variable gets larger, so does the other
  2. 1 variable goes up, the other goes down
  3. measures the linear relationship between 2 variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. positive values
  2. negative values
A
  1. values range from 0 to 1
  2. values range from -1 to 0
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. increases in 1 variable means…..
  2. perfect correlation are…..
  3. limitation:
A
  1. highly predictable second variable
  2. impossible in the real world - complexity of human behaviour, measurement error
  3. only detects linear relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. correlations do not…..
  2. correlation of 0
  3. correlation of 1
A
  1. represent percentages
  2. no relationship
  3. perfect relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. effect size
  2. Cohen
  3. Hemphill
  4. very few stronger than…..
A
  1. measuring the strength of the relationship/ association
  2. small 0.1, medium 0.3, and large 0.5
  3. bottom third, middle third, top third
  4. 0.3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

square of correlation r2

A

percentage of variance accounted for. Tells you how much the variance in the dependent variable is accounted for by the independent variable.
For example, a model with an R-squared value of 0.9 means that approximately 90% of the variance in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variables. This suggests a strong relationship between the variables and indicates that the model provides a good fit to the data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

You need _____ in both things you are looking at in order to examine correlation

A

variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

_____ differences in correlation correspond to _____ differences in variance

A

small, large

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

correlation studies limitations
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

A
  1. correlation is not causation
  2. control for third variables (partial correlation & multiple regression)
  3. temporal information (something needs to cause A before you can measure B)
  4. linear assumption
  5. need variability to see correlation
  6. outliers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
  1. Curvilinear relationships best seen through….
  2. important to examine ___ before ____
A
  1. scatter plots
  2. data, analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

correlation studies strengths
1.
2.
3.

A
  1. naturally occurring
  2. useful when things cannot be manipulated or changed
  3. can be applied to archival data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q
  1. Naturalistic observation
  2. observations taken over a _____ period are more ____ than a single observation
A
  1. observations for descriptive purposes, with interpretations
  2. longer, accurate
22
Q
  1. Observation in the lab =
  2. Observation outside the lab =
A
  1. naturalistic observation
  2. systematic observation
23
Q

measure naturalistic observation by:
1.
2.
3.

A
  1. coding schemes (quantitative)
  2. interviews (quantitative)
  3. no interfering, no influences
24
Q

N.O
1. strengths
2. weaknesses

A
  1. realism/ecological validity, often rich qualitative detail, exempt from ethical review
  2. difficult, time-consuming, can be lots of data thats hard to interpret
25
Case studies
extremely detailed description of a person of a few people. Necessary for unique/rare populations. Can be qualitative or quantitative
26
1. nomothetic studies 2. reductionism
1. studies that are from groups of people, but they are averages of a lot of people - which loses detail 2. finding averages - but losing detail
27
case studies 1. strengths 2. weaknesses
1. lots of detail, rare populations, generate & test hypothesis 2. generalizibility
27
1. Archival data 2. content analysis
1. existing data surrounds, usually publicly available 2. systematically observing and quantifying (coding schemes), counting instances of interest, analyzing texts (natural language processing)
28
archival data 1. strengths 2. weaknesses
1. ecological validity (real world), lots of data 2. difficult to organize and obtain, only have what is available, cannot make casual inferences
29
survery & questionnaires
most simple way to gather info about a person. *but they must know this info and be willing to share it.
30
response sets
ways of responding dont reflect the question content
31
Likert scales need 1. 2. 3. 4.
1. neutral mid-point 2. number of points depends on question 3. label all points 4. is behaviour low-frequency or high-frequency
32
scales of measurement 1. 2. 3. 4.
1. nominal = named categories 2. ordinal = ranked order 3. interval = equally spaced (continuous) 4. ratio = interval with a meaningful zero (continuous)
33
descriptive statistics
summarizing your data - an average across items or across items and participants includes correlation studies
34
central tendency
1. mean = average (sum / # of scores) 2. median = middle *helpful with extreme scores 3. mode = most frequent score
35
1. variability 2. standard deviation 3. low standard deviation means..
1. how scores differ from one another, spread of scores, difference in responses 2. average amount by which scores differ from the mean 3. more agreement
36
1. the normal distribution 2. ___ of all scores are ___ SD above or below the mean 3. ____ of all scores are __ SD above or below the mean
1. the bell shaped curve, mean and median identical 2. 68%, 1 3. 95%, 2
37
1. deceptive statistics 2. ___ vs ____ differences 3. graphing data
1. when not reported accurately, stats can be misleading 2. relative vs absolute (double sounds like more than going from 1 to 2) 3. need to check numbers on the axis
38
1. Inferential statistics 2. most common form = 3. H0 vs H1
1. making inferences about the population from sample 2. null hypothesis significance testing *any procedure that produces a p value 3. H0 = null hypothesis, no difference, effect being studied doesnt exist H1 = alternative hypothesis, there is a difference
39
p value below alpha 0.5 = p value above alpha 0.5 =
reject null hypothesis, statistically significant fail to reject null hypothesis
40
*** P value __ p values mean data is ____ Cannot conclude that H0 is ___ or ___ based on data
probability that these data could arise, if the null hypothesis were true small, unlikely likely or unlikely
41
p value replication
the p value you get the first time tells you nothing about what will happen the next time you measure p
42
1. Trafimow said .... P value myths: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
1. said NHST was logically invalid 1. p < 0.5 = null hypothesis is unlikely 2. rejecting null hypothesis and chance of false positive is 5% 3. the results would replicate 95 out of 100 times 4. there is a large difference or effect 5. there is an important or significance effect
43
1. Effect size 2. significant 3. nonsignificant 4. Cohens d
1. Measuring the strength of relationship between two variables 2. p value lower than .05 3. p > .05 4. difference in means, in units of SD
44
Confidence intervals
our sample sizes can be estimates of population, but theres uncertainty about these estimates CI are a quantification of this uncertainty
45
The larger the sample size
the narrower the CI and less uncertainty
46
1. statistical power 2. more power?
1. ability to detect small effects using NHST 2. Bigger samples
47
Bayesian statistics
provide estimates of whether null hypothesis is more or less likely based on data
48
SD of sample vs. population
sample = N-1 population = N
49