Test 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What did the Canadian charter or rights and freedoms have a significant impact on (specific to this unit lolz)

A

Defining police powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did the Charter affect Police powers (generally)?

A

Provide legal safeguards against unlimited power of police, codifies certain powers as acceptable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which section limits all charter rights?

A

Section 1 (There are exceptions to charter rights if deemed legally necessary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which is the most debated section of the Charter?

A

Section 8, and Section 9 slightly less so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is section 7? (The definition of the section)

A

“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right to not be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What applicable right is granted by section 7?

A

The right to silence, even when subpoenaed or asked by police to speak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What duty do the police have in relation to the right to silence?

A

Must notify you of your right to remain silent when arrested, and the fact that anything you say can be used against you.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the one thing you can say that does not constitute a waiver of your right?

A

“I assert my section 7 right to silence.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case established the use of “I assert my….” statement as the only speaking that does not constitute a waiver? Give a summary of the case.

A

R. v. Singh. Singh was arrested and originally attested that he was asserting his right to silence. But then he did give away some details. He tried to say that they weren’t honouring his right to silence, but they were like you waived it when you started sharing details hunny.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why should you never waive your right to silence?

A

You can lie without knowing you’re lying (mishear information, fill in blanks, forget details, misremember), police are allowed to lie and try to trick you….

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happens if you’re intoxicated when they tell you about your right to silence?

A

It still counts as long as you are voluntarily speaking and not like blackout.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do questioning rules vary for minors?

A

They can have a parent present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does the right to silence apply to the motor highway act?

A

If you are pulled over you can be compelled to give your license and registration, you have no requirement to speak outside of that but they might get annoyed or suspicious and escalate the stop so it’s advisable to cooperate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If a suspect repeatedly tries to invoke their right to silence, can the police officer still continue interrogation?

A

Yes, they can continue interrogating at length despite someone asserting their right to silence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the exceptions to the right to silence?

A

You do not have a right to silence in situations where it would obstruct a police officer from carrying out their duties (ex. traffic stop ID and registration).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is section 8?

A

Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, aka you have a right to autonomy over your stuff and personal correspondents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the general rule for searching?

A

Police officers must have a warrant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the exceptions to the search warrant rule?

A

Consent, low reasonable expectation of privacy, search incident to an arrest, plain view and exigent circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How does consent work as an exception to needing a warrant for a search?

A

If the police ask you if they can look (car, house, apartment etc..) and you say yes then they don’t need a warrant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Can children consent to their own searches?

A

Parents consent for them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How is consent and search iffy if you live with roomates?

A

If one person says no and one person says yes. Unless one isn’t on the lease, the no overrides the yes (also unless you’re not home, your door is open and your roommate says yes. This would only a allow a plain view search.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is a reasonable expectation of privay?

A

The level of privacy that is expected by an individual in different places and contexts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are some contexts and their levels of REP?

A

Locked items are the highest level.
If something is laid out in plain view at home there is moderate expectation. Things discarded in public places are considered the lowest, things discarded outside home is also low.
No REP at border crossings, airports, and low on public transit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How do plain view searches work?

A

If a police officer can see something in they are allowed to search, especially true in public places and vehicles. Includes the use of sniffer dogs bc the scent you emit is not considered hidden.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How do exigent circumstances work as an exception for search and seizure?

A

If a situation is very urgent or severe there will not be time to get a warrant, officers believe they need to search to protect people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are some circumstances that count as exigent circumstances?

A

Shootings, bomb threats, kidnapping of minors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Can exigent circumstances justify no-knock warrants?

A

Must have significant reason to believe one is in immediate danger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What section of the charter covers for unwarranted search in exigent circumstances?

A

Section 1, the reasonable limit to freedoms bc police may need to violate some freedoms to protect people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What case legitimized the use of FLIR?

A

Tessling case 2004, thought he was growing weed but didn’t have enough evidence. Used magnetic thermal imaging to detect heat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How was FLIR legitimized?

A

Because the device can be operated off of the private property and only measures something not protected by REP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What happens if evidence is obtained illegally? What section of the charter legitimizes this?

A

It may be excluded from trial if its use would bring the justice system into disrepute. Section 24(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What are the conditions necessary for a search to be reasonable as held in R. v. S.A.B. (2003 SCC 60)?

A
  1. must be authorized by law
  2. law itself must be reasonable
  3. manner in which the search was carried out must be reasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What section of the charter explains what to do if a right is violated?

A

Section 24 (2) set out in Grant 2009 (remedy section of the charter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What is the Grant test and what are the steps?

A

Test to figure out if evidence collected unlawfully should be excluded.

  1. Seriousness (like was it excessive force or just a technical error? were police acting in good faith?)
  2. Impact of breach on accused
  3. Society’s interest (how reliable is the evidence and how relevant is the evidence to the case?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is section 9?

A

Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained (including psychologically) or imprisoned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What was the Grant Case? Problem? Outcome?

A

Mr.Grant, young Black man, was approached by police officers in a high crime area bc he was “looking shady”. They asked him for ID and if he had anything on him (which he did and admitted it). The problem was that the police had begun detainment as soon as they approached him and thus they should’ve told him his right to silence. The outcome was that the police made a mistake but it wasn’t enough to exclude the tangible evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

In what circumstances has the SCC decided search warrants are required?

A
  • If there is going to be secret recording of conversations by state agents
  • in cases involving video surveillance
  • for perimeter searches of residential premises (past the curb is private)
  • before the installation of tracking devices
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What is the definition of detention?

A

Police officer assumes control over the movement of a person by a demand or direction that may have significant legal consequence and that prevents or impedes access to legal counsel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What is the timeline of being informed about the reason for your detention?

A

Does not have to be immediately but sooner rather than later, maximum 24 hours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What is the timeline of being informed about the reason for your arrest?

A

Must be immediately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

what is psychological detention?

A

True legal obligation not to walk away from a police officer or agent of the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Where does the power to arrest come from?

A

Criminal code and other federal statutes and provincial legislation (such as motor vehicle acts).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What are the reasons an arrest can be made?

A

prevent a crime from being committed, terminate a crime from being committed or compel an accused person to attend trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Is it common or not to be formally arrested if accused of a crime?

A

Not very common, less than 5% of accused. It is really only common for violent or very serious offences or if the person seems like they might flee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What is needed in order to make an arrest? What are the things that need to be proven?

A

An arrest warrant is needed, in order to get that must convince justice of the peace that what you’re saying is true and there is probable cause for the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What contexts are exceptions to the arrest warrant rule?

A

When someone is caught committing an offence, reasonable belief that someone committed an indictable offence, belief that a person is about to commit an indictable offence, anti-terrorism act allows to arrest on suspicion of terrorism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What is an information?

A

A written statement sworn by an informant, normally a police officer, alleging that a person has committed a specific offence. Given to the judge to try to get an arrest warrant (i.e. laying an information).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What is an arrest warrant?

A

A document that permits a police officer to arrest a specific person for a specified reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What is section 10?

A

The right to counsel provision. Means that on arrest or detention everyone has right to:
a. be informed of reasons
b. access counsel without delay and be informed of that right
c. have validity of detention determined by habeas corpus and be released if not lawful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

What is the most debated part of section 10?

A

b. right to counsel and to be told of that right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What are the details of section 10 b?

A

Be told you have right to counsel, have swift access to counsel, be given an opportunity (provide phone and number if you don’t have a lawyer) before questioning, rights are triggered again if the level of the sentence increases, if you’ve just been detained then you should be let go at end of interrogation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

What is granted by section 10 c?

A

THe right to challenge your detention in front of a judge and be released if detention is not found lawful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

What are the issues with the legal aid system?

A

The bar is very low so its not available to all low income people, there are not enough of them, they are rushed, most often they just take a plea (90-95% in US), you can be arrested for not paying fines even if you have no money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

What level of government control legal aid systems?

A

Provincial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

What is section 11?

A

An person charged with an offence has the right to a) be informed without reasonable delay of the specific offence. (but it doesn’t have to be immediately so the definition is a little gray)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

What power did the charter give to accused?

A

The right to challenge the actions of the police.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

List the main limits on the police given by the charter.

A
  • police must have search warrant to get info from internet services about identity of suspects (R. v. Spencer 2014 SCC 43)
  • limits on use of Mr.Big stings (R. v. Hart, 2014 SCC 52)
  • severe restrictions have been placed on the investigative strategy of placing an undercover cope in a jail cell R. v. Hurley, 2010 SCC 18)
  • all relevant information gathered during a case investigation must be disclosed to the defence counsel (R. v. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 SCR 326)
  • policies for strip searches must consider unique circumstance of Indigenous women and other minorities (R. v. Golden, 2011 SCC 83)
58
Q

What are the 4 levels of courts that deal with criminal cases?

A
  • Provincial/territorial courts
  • provincial/ territorial superior courts (Kings Bench)
  • Provincial appellate courts
  • the supreme court of Canada
59
Q

What is a Mr.Big sting?

A

An investigative strategy where officers go undercover as gang members and lure suspects into their groups, offer community, financial help, etc.. if they admit to having committed a serious offence (whatever they are suspected of).

60
Q

What Territory is an exception to the 4 levels of court, and what do they have implemented instead?

A

Nunavut, and they have a unified or single-level court, the Nunavut Court of Justice, where the powers of the court have been combined into one superior court where all judges can hear all types of cases

61
Q

What are the courts responsible for determining?

A
  • Guilt or innocence of accused persons
  • An appropriate sentence for those who are convicted
  • That the rights of the accused persons are protected
62
Q

Why do officers resort to Mr.Big stings?

A

Because there is not enough information on the suspect to convict them, and the suspect is considered a dangerous or serious offender.

63
Q

What is judicial independence?

A

the principle that protects the legal sphere from external forces, especially the government

64
Q

What is the confession rate for Mr.BIg stings?

A

75%

65
Q

What does a case in the Manitoba Provincial court look like?

A

No jury
Bench Trials only
One Judge

66
Q

What is the conviction rate when a confession is obtained?

A

95%

67
Q

Why is there concern over reliability of confessions?

A

Mr.Big is like a looming authority that is offering something the suspect wants, so they may be coerced into falsely confessing out of desperation, fear or by wanting to impress them.

68
Q

Where do most cases got to trial and end in Manitoba?

A

the provincial court

69
Q

What is grounds for an appeal?

A

you need to be able to demonstrate that there was either an error in law, or a factual error has been made

70
Q

What case law provided guidelines for Mr.Big stings? What are those guidelines?

A

R. v. Hart 2014. Confessions obtained via the Mr.Big strategy that rely on coercion, threats or financial inducements should not be admissible in court. Evidence collected in the stings is only admissible if the prosecutor can prove that the reliability of the evidence outweighs the prejudicial effects of the strategy.

71
Q

what happens when you appeal your conviction?

A

you have to go through all the court systems

72
Q

What does Manitobas King’s Bench do?

A

trials and appeals, if you are having a trial at Kings Bench then you are being tried for a more serious offence

73
Q

How many justices are in the Manitoba court of appeals?

A

3

74
Q

What is entrapment?

A

A process in which an ordinary person commits a crime they otherwise would not have committed because they are set up to do it.

75
Q

Who are the Justices of the Supreme Court appointed by?

A

the PM (the governor in council)

76
Q

What case provided guidelines for entrapment? What are the guidelines?

A

R v. Mack 1988. if person is persistently harassed into committing an offence that they would not have commited had it been for the action of the police. Cannot target people randomly, must believe they are already engaged in that behaviour.

77
Q

How many justices in the SCC and how do they work?

A

there are 9, and there needs to be an odd number present at all time so there is never a tie, and not all of them need to be present

78
Q

how is a SCC case dealt with?

A

it is an appellate court, they do not hold trials, it is majority rules so that is why they cant have an even number of justices, and decisions made by SCC are final

79
Q

Why is Mr.Big not considered entrapment?

A

Bc they are not prosecuting on the low level criminal activity they get coerced into, just the crime they have already committed so it’s not technically entraping….sureeeee

80
Q

What are the requirements for the demographics of the justices in the SCC?

A

3 from Quebec, 3 from prairie provinces, 1 from east of quebec , the rest can be from wherever

81
Q

Where is the legal authority for police use of force come from?

A

The criminal code

82
Q

what are the requirements to be a justice for the SCC

A

need to be in good standings with the law society, lawyer for 10 years, and judge for 5

83
Q

What principles about police use of force are set out in the criminal code?

A
  1. officers exercising force must be performing a duty they are required or authorized to do
  2. they must act on reasonable grounds
  3. they may use only so much force as is necessary under the circumstances
  4. they are responsible for any excessive use of force
84
Q

what is the mandatory retirement age at SCC

A

75 years old

85
Q

what is the cheif justice and who is it typically appointed to?

A

they decide who hears what cases, who is responsible for writing the decision, and they in concert with some other judges will exercise control over the docket (what cases are we going to hear and when are we going to hear the), and the longest tenured justice is typically appointed chief justice

86
Q

What is the one plus one standard for force?

A

Police can exert one level of force higher than what they’re confronted with.

87
Q

What are the five options of force?

A
  • officer presence
  • dialogue
  • empty hands
  • compliance tools
  • lethal force
88
Q

What must exist for a police officer to use lethal force?

A

There must be a legitimate threat for the officer or another human? If the suspect is unarmed and fleeing they cannot shoot.

89
Q

what percent of cases does the SCC hear a year?

A

less than 1%, maybe 75 cases a year

90
Q

What are the guidelines for a citizen’s arrest?

A

Someone has to be actively committing and indictable offence, force must be reasonable to the situation, no search or seizure.

91
Q

what percent of case applications does the SCC hear ?

A

they receive hundreds of applications but grant only about 10% of them

92
Q

What does the castle doctrine outline?

A

You have the right to protect your property, if someone poses a threat you can respond but force must be proportional.

93
Q

What are many of the cases seen by the SCC about?

A

they are appeals of decisions made by lower courts where the lower court judge or the tribunal must have made a mistake dealing with the law or they must have done something without jurisdiction or authority

94
Q

What are less lethal force options?

A

Force option that is unlikely to cause death or serious injury. Pepper spray, tear gas, conducted energy weapons.

95
Q

What is the principle of accountability for the police?

A

The actions of police officers and services are subject to review and there are formal channels that individuals can use to lodge complaints against the police.

96
Q

when was the first Indigenous supreme court judge appointed?

A

2021 babbbyyyyyy

97
Q

What has the increased visibility of the police done to processes of accountability?

A

Created civilian oversight and other models of accountability that include civilian involvement in investigations.

98
Q

List things about the Court of Kings Bench

A
  • it is the superior court in Manitoba
  • federally appointed judges
  • jury or judge decisions
  • more serious criminal cases
  • trials
99
Q

how are the judges for MB court of appeals and the Court of Kings Benches appointed?

A

they are federally appointed

100
Q

Do other branches of CJS have systems of accountability?

A

No, its very rare for a corrections officer, judge or prosecutors etc.. to be prosecuted.

101
Q

Why are most complaints against the police still invalidated?

A

police loyalty and dismissing civilian’s complaints in favour of the police officer’s subjective experience.

102
Q

what is Drug treatment court in Manitoba?

A

it operates within CoKB and it is designed for people with active addictions and it is for drug related offences and non-violent offences committed because of addiction

103
Q

Where are the police codes of ethics and conduct contained?

A

Various provincial/territorial acts, provincial policy documents, manuals of individual police services.

104
Q

What are some questions in ethic codes to assist officers with ethical challenges?

A
  • “is the activity or decision consistent with organizational or agency policy and the law?”
  • “do the outcomes or consequences generate more harm than good?”
  • “what are the outcomes or consequences resulting from the activity of decision and whom do they affect”
  • “can the activity or decision be justified legally and ethically?”
105
Q

What happens if somebody says no to drug treatment court?

A

they have to go through the normal court process

106
Q

in order to go through drug treatment court what do you need to do?

A

plead guilty, and take responsibility for your actions. FESS UP BITCH

107
Q

What are two example of racial profiling?

A

R. v. Brown. 2003, where the Ontario court of appeal defined racial profiling.
Starlight tours: Indigenous people acting disorderly were taken out of the city and dropped off at night, even in freezing conditions. Neil Stonechild was killed by that.

108
Q

what happens if you are not successful with drug treatment court?

A

a warrant for your arrest will be issued and you will be sentenced on the original charges the same way if you never went through drug treatment court

109
Q

What is bias-free policing?

A

the requirement that police officers make decisions on the basis of reasonable suspicion and probable grounds rather than stereotypes about race, religion, ethnicity, gender or other prohibited grounds

110
Q

what happens if you relapse in drug treatment court?

A

you don’t automatically get kicked out if you are honest about relapsing, but if you lie about it then you can

111
Q

What is racial profiling?

A

“the targeting of individual members of a particular racial group, on the basis of the supposed criminal propensity of the entire group”

112
Q

Describe the main case from the Mr.Big documentary.

A
  • (18 y o) Atif Rafay and Sebastien Burke involved in triple homicide in July 1994
  • Sebastien lured into Mr.Big sting
  • the guys admit to killing
  • Atif says they were coerced into confessing to it
  • still in jail
113
Q

what is Gladue Courts?

A

takes into account the unique circumstances of Indigenous accused and Indigenous courts

114
Q

what are problem solving courts?

A

specialized courts that are designed to divert offenders with special needs from the criminal justice system

115
Q

what are 3 defining attributes of problem-solving courts?

A
  1. focus on addressing the underlying problems of offenders, victims and communities
  2. interagency and interdisciplinary collaboration
  3. accountability to the community
116
Q

What sections do we need to know for the test, and what are the relevant cases for them?

A
  • section 7: Singh Case (he kept repeating i’m exercising my right o silence, but he ended up chatting to police and telling them revealing info), right to silence it is applied upon arrest, Hart
  • section 8: search and seizure, Tessling case (weed guy), REP (reasonable expectation of privacy). Also R. V. Saeed (can use warrant to get DNA, may use force)
  • section 9 everybody has the right to not be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned, grant case ( weed and gun guy and they did not notify him of his rights to silence), freedom of movement: if your freedom is being impeded by officer or the state, includes psychological
  • 10 (b): McCrimmin case, don’t have to wait until your lawyer is there they just have to let you contact or notify them
  • 24 (2): grant test, it can only happen if police make an error
117
Q

Who is Al Haslet?

A

Originator of the technique in 1990s, acted as Mr.Big many times, says its a legitimate technique.

118
Q

What happened with Andy Rhodes? (Mr.Big sting)

A

A couple was killed in the woods and some woman said Andy did it, there was no other evidence connecting him to the crime, he got coerced into Mr.Big sting, they pressured him to confess and he never really did.

119
Q

What happened with Jason dix?

A

He was loosely connected to a murder of two machinists in Edmonton, roped into Mr.Big, he never confessed to the murder, later sued the RCMP.

120
Q

What came from the McCrimmon case?

A

the SCC held that the Charter does not require the presence, upon request of defence counsel during custodial interrogation

121
Q

what came from the Saeed case?

A

the court has given police the authority to use a warrant to obtain DNA from a suspect, by force is necessary

122
Q

what are bail courts for?

A

people who have been arrested, and you shouldn’t have to wait longer than 3 days fro a bail hearing, done by a justice of peace not a judge

123
Q

What is the Youth Court?

A

where you go if you commit crime between ages 12-18, sometimes can be tried as an adult if you are 16+ but it rarely happens

124
Q

what is the youth criminal justice act?

A

it has a lot of stuff from criminal code, but some added procedures and sentencing changes

125
Q

Why were Gladue courts created?

A

because of the over representation of indigeneous people in the CJS

126
Q

what is section 718.2 (e) of the criminal code?

A

it require judges to consider sentencing options other than incarceration, particularly for Indigenous offenders

127
Q

what are gladue reports?

A

histoircal personal impact statements that give contextual circumstances to the offenders behaviour

128
Q

Do the federal government and the SCC ever chat?

A

Yes! the government sometimes asks for legal opinion, called reference or reference case. Ex. 1988: can Quebec secede from Canada?
2004: pwetty pwease can gay ppl get married?

129
Q

how can you be eligible for peacemaker court?

A

plead guilty and take responsibility for actions, the victim also has to agree to do the peacemaking circle

130
Q

what does the outcome of a peacemaker court look like?

A

final agreements may require the offender to provide restitution, attend counselling , and/or to complete a number of community service hours the charges get dropped if the crown approves, if crown doesn’t approve the report from the peacemaking circle will be submitted to the judge at sentencing

131
Q

Sometimes an SCC verdict essentially voids something in the criminal code true or false?

A

It is still in the charter but cannot be used to prosecute something. Like one time the offence of spreading false news was STRUCK DOWN.

132
Q

What is the Indigenous People’s Court in Thunder Bay?

A

a restorative justice approach to sentencing and draws upon Indigenous culture and traditions and elders play a key role, must plead guilty to be eligible

133
Q

What are circuit courts?

A

Courts for remote areas where a judge, court clerk, defence lawyer, crown counsel fly in and does the court super fast style.

134
Q

What is the Cree Court in Saskatchewan?

A

they travel to remote communities to hear cases, its judges and lawyers are cree speakers and often attended by cree-speaking probation officers, they have translators when necessary, but this court makes it possible for victims and offenders to speak in thier language

135
Q

What are the issues with Circuit courts?

A

Backlog of cases, time constraints, shortage of interpreters, cultural differences, case delay, and then what to do with sentenced ppl if no room in prison?

136
Q

What is Therapeutic Justice?

A

the use of law and the authority of courts as change agents in promoting the health and well-being of offenders while ensuring that their legal rights are protecting and that justice is done

137
Q

what is community wellness court (Yukon)?

A

addresses the needs of people with drug/alcohol issues and metal illness, a major challenge is high rate of non-completion

138
Q

when can mental health courts operate?

A

pre and post charge stages

139
Q

how much does mental health courts reduce offending?

A

10-75%

140
Q
A
141
Q

How does search incident to arrest work?

A

Upon arresting someone, police can pat down to ensure no dangerous items on their person, search in immediate lunge area and with reasonable tools (I.e. pokey stick for bag)