Test 2 Flashcards
Freedom of contracts
-freedom/right to enter into a contract with terms of our choosing
-right to be stupid
-laws will not rescue from poor decisions
valid
-meets all legal requirements
-law will enforce it
voidable
-contract that appears to be valid on face
-defect that gives one party the option to cancel the contract
unenforceable
-valid contract that the law will not enforce due to a specific legal reason
Do contracts have to be in writing?
-Vast majority don’t
-some do
contract
-agreement enforceable by the law
-all contracts are agreements but not all agreements are contracts
Valid contract (must have all 4)
-mutual assent/agreement (foundation)
-capacity
-consideration
-legality/lawful purpose
Mutual assent
-two people have agreed about something
offeror
-makes the offer
-right to control terms of offer
offeree
-receives the offer
Four choices of the offeree
-yes
-no
-counter offer
-no response
test of contract
-was an offer made and an acceptance given
three requirements for offer
-offeror must show serious intent (reasonable person test)
-must be definite and certain
-offeror must communicate the offer to the offeree (everyday communication)
Ways on offer can terminate (6)
-rejection by the offeree
-revocation by the offeror
-counter offer by the offeree (switch positions)
-lapse of time
-death/mental incapacity of the offeror/offeree
-destruction of the subject matter
revocation by the offeror (terminate)
-offeror revokes the offer
-offeror can revoke at anytime prior to acceptance even if given deadline
lapse of time (terminate)
-offer will terminate after a reasonable amount of time if there is no response from the offeree
-typically 2-3 months
Acceptance requirements
-must accept all the terms/conditions of the offer
-must be absolute/unconditional (all in)
-offeree must communicate acceptance to offeror (silence isn’t acceptance)
Timing rules
-acceptance becomes effective when it is sent by the offeree
-revocation becomes effective when its read by the offeree
-offeree can accept quicker then offeror can revoke
-puts burden on offeror to act quick
Acceptance is defective (4)
-duress
-under influence
-fraud
-a mistake by one or both parties
duress
-pressure of threats of any kind that takes away the free will of the offeree
-physical/non physical
RESULT- void contract
under influence
-one party in a fiduciary relationship takes advantage of the other party in obtaining his acceptance
RESULT- voidable
fiduciary relationship
-special relationship under the law of trust where one party is legally obligated to act in best interest of the other party
-Trust fund
Fraud (5)
-misrepresentation of a material (major) fact
-opinion is not fraud
-law assumes we are sophisticated consumers
-silence is not fraud
RESULT- void/voidable
mistake by one or both parties (Subject matter of the contract)
-both parties mistaken
RESULT- voidable
mistake by one or both parties (Value of the subject matter)
-one or both parties mistaken
RESULT- valid
capacity
-power or legal authority given to you and me by the law to enter a contract
Capacity situations(3)
-minor
-intoxication
-mental illness/defect
minors
-under the minimum age to enter a contract
-a contract made by a minor is voidable at his option except for necessities
-if it is a necessity the minor does not pay contract price but pays the cost of providing
Necessities
-food
-clothing (basic)
-necessary medical care
-housing (not all)
minor decisions
-affirm (stay in)
-disaffirm (back out)
Minor affirm
-can only affirm when he reaches age of majority
Minor disaffirm
-can disaffirm at any time while he’s a minor and with reasonable time after age of majority
-failure to disaffirm leads to affirm
-minor must return purchase if he still has it in whatever condition
-adult deals with minor at their financial risk
cosigner
-second person on the contract that is fully liable to perform under contract
-100% liable
ways you affirm as a minor?
-let adult know
-keep what you bought/make payments
-stop making payments (disaffirm)
intoxication
-under the influence of mind altering substance
-civil and criminal have nothing to do with each other
intoxication level of measurement
-you don’t understand what you’re doing
intoxication contract RESULTs
-contract made by an intoxicated person is voidable at his option except for necessities
-can affirm once sober
mental illness/defect
-men/women who are declared mentally incompetent by a judge after medical testimony
RESULT: any contract made is void
mental illness/defect (NOT/dementia)
-men/women who have not been declared mentally incompetent
-trigger event is lucid (disaffirm)
RESULT: contract is voidable at his option except for necessities
Consideration
-bargain for exchange
-promises don’t have to have any money value
-measure by new obligation
-have to promise something new (pre existing duty)
legality/lawful purpose
-contract must be for a legal or lawful purpose if not its an illegal contract and the law will not enforce it
-no remedy for either party
Contract illegal
-violation of a statute
-violation of public policy
Violation of a statute
-violation of criminal law
-violation of usury law
-violation of a revenue licensing statute
-violation of a regulatory licensing statute
-violation of a Sunday blue law
violation of usury law
-sets max interest rate a lender can charge
violation of a revenue licensing statue
-gov’t charge business money for a license to operate
-no effect on the contract
RESULT: valid/enforceable
violation of a regulatory licensing statute
-gov’t entity sets minimum standards for the license holder to meet
-law will not enforce
violation of a Sunday blue law
-prohibits certain business activities on Sunday including the making of a contract
violation of public policy
-good for society as a whole
-competition in the market place
-employment contract
-sale of the business
employment contract
-can’t go to work for the competition
sale of the business
-saler must agree not to open a competing business after the sell
if/when restrictions (employment/sale of a business)
-restrictions will be enforced only if they are reasonable as to time/territory
-if a court finds the restriction to be unreasonable it will modify that restriction to make it reasonable then enforce it
-enforce with an injunction
time
-how long the restriction last
-shorter the time the more likely reasonable (1 year)
territory
-how large of a geographical area are you restricted to
-smaller the area the more reasonable
sale of a business restrictions
-can’t open a competing business for a designated time/area
how does common law treat contracts?
-verbal and written contracts are the same
statute of frauds
-law that states some things have to be written
-if on list and your contract isn’t in writing its unenforceable
-unless required by statue of fraud contract does not have to be in writing to be enforceable