Test 2 Flashcards
Early historical comparisons between magic and religion:
- Manipulation vs Supplication
- magic manipulates the natural world, religion is supernatural invocation to affect natural world - Utility vs Celebration
- magic is utilitarian, religion is about birth of a child, death of a mother, wedding - Personal vs Communal
- magic is personal, idiosyncratic, while religion is communal (Durkheim)
A universal complex of beliefs
- Magic is the belief that people can directly control forces of nature through symbolic communication without supernatural aid
- Magic is “good”–no “black magic” in anthropology–it is helping the world move in a positive direction
- There’s a continuum of magic–Longuda are keenly aware of their use of magic, we are not
Definition of Magic:
“The belief that people can directly control forces of nature through symbolic communication and without supernatural aid”
5 Magical Principles
- Symbols–conduit for magic work
- Power–mana
- Forces in nature
a) Intrinsic Forces
b) Predetermined plan
c) Independent
d) Can be influenced - Humans are connected to the natural world
- Sir James George Frazer’s principles
5 Magical Principles: Sir James George Frazer’s Principles
a) Law of Similarity (homeopathic magic): things that are similar may influence each other
- ex: Luba in Zaïre used a dried grass ring shaker (which sounds like rain) to ask for rain at the end of the dry season
b) Law of Contact (contagious magic): things that have been in contact can influence each other
- ex: Hottentot–grab sand from footprints of game for hunting
c) Principles of Association
- ex: eat walnuts to be smarter because walnuts look like brains
Does magic work?
Nocebo effect (nocebo for negative impact)
- ex. Walter Canon and Vodoun zombies–you think you’ve been turned into a zombie, so you don’t eat/drink/sleep, your community shuns you, and in three days you die
Magic / Sorcery Continuum
Can also use 5 principles of magic to hurt the world
- Sorcerers are selfish/antisocial–help themselves at expense of others
- they work in private, because they know they shouldn’t do it
- countering sorcery is blurring lines
Taboo Definition
“A ritually sanctioned prohibition against contact with a thing, a person, or an activity”
OR
“The avoidance of establishing a magical connection”
ex. pregnancy in Leviticus, or women who don’t cut cords or carry water during pregnancy
Perspectives on Taboos: Frazer
A symptom of primitive irrationality
Perspectives on Taboos: Durkheim
A means of maintaining the distinction between the sacred and the profane
Perspectives on Taboos: A. R. Radcliffe-Brown
A way to stress the importance of certain people/objects (structuralism)
Perspectives on Taboos: Mary Douglas
A window into how a culture classifies the world (things are taboo when they don’t fit into the classification system)
One chapter from Purity & Danger (1966)
- Leviticus 11 (clean & unclean animals)–things that are liminal have taboos
- holiness is closely associated–holiness is goal of Jewish behavior
- People in this time period conceptualized world in 3 realms:
a) Firmament - 2 legged animals with wings
b) Water - scaly fish with fins
c) 4 legged things with split hoofs which chew the cud
Religious Organizations in North America: Stages
- Cult
- Church
- Sect
- Denomination
Cult
Charismatic leader
Unethical conversion: ex 60s-80s notions of brainwashing
Questionable beliefs (is the pop culture notion)
Sociology:
- 1st stage of new religious movement (cult)
- Weber–every religious movement begins as a cult
- NRMs claim to have knowledge which average person doesn’t
- Charisma (NOT mana)–leader is given a supernatural thing (like connection to God)
- Weber: charismatic leader is anti-establishment, unstable (challenges authority)
- Issues with NRMs: what happens with loss of charismatic leader? Need “routinization of charisma”
1) Authority of CL shifted from person to position–things are written down, too
2) Buy-in–divine sanction to transfer of power, along with social acceptance–ex chiefdoms justify power with the divine
3) Need financial structures built in to keep it running–formalized
Niebuhr’s Take on Denomination Formation
Differences don’t come from theological issues (Bellah)
- Your theology reflects your cultural context, and different theologies come from differences in socioeconomic status–so theologies justify social stations (for example, Baptist split in the US was north/south split over slavery)