Test 1 Study Guide Flashcards

1
Q

___ 1. Which of the following in NOT a reason given for developing our natural moral reasoning skills?

a. We should be able to critically evaluate our own beliefs.
b. As we develop our skills we will be able to win more ethical arguments.
c. People of all perspect ives should be able to hold meaningful dialogue with each other.
d. Diverse communities necessitate that values be built of reason.

A

b. As we develop our skills we will be able to win more ethical arguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. Hume’s Law is about
    a. The difficulty of connecting ethics and natural science.
    b. The ethics of religion.
    c. The question of capital punishment.
    d. The problem of deriving an ought from an is.
A

d. The problem of deriving an ought from an is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Metaethics is largely about studying

a. The meanings of ethical language.
b. Those things which are beyond normal ethics.
c. Historical literature about ethics.
d. Ethical decisions sanctioned by religious beliefs.

A

a. The meanings of ethical language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The reasons supporting a conclusion in an argument are called

a. ethical principles.
b. ad hominems.
c. valid forms.
d. premises.

A

d. premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ethical theory does which of the following

a. Proves an argument to be right or wrong.
b. Shows people how they should act.
c. Agrees with legal decisions.
d. Provides reasons for judging actions to be right or wrong.

A

d. Provides reasons for judging actions to be right or wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Another name for a good argument is

a. A correct argument.
b. A sound argument.
c. A winning argument.
d. A fair argument.

A

b. A sound argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The difference between teleological and deontological is that

a. Teleological is moral and deontological is immoral.
b. Teleological is focused on intention and deontological is focused on motive.
c. Deontological is focused of intention and teleological is focused on consequence.
d. Deontological is moral and teleological is immoral.

A

Deontological is focused of intention and teleological is focused on consequence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ethics requires skillful reasoning. Which of the following is NOT important to making a good argument?

a. The structure of the argument.
b. The conclusion follows from the premises.
c. The argument leads to the right conclusion.
d. The argument has internal logic.

A

c. The argument leads to the right conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which of the following best describes Ethics?

a. A form of the

golden rule.


b. A branch of philosophy that uses reason to support positions.
c. A body of beliefs about right and wrong handed down from one generation to the next.
d. Behavior that is agreed upon to be moral by the majority.

A

b. A branch of philosophy that uses reason to support positions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ethical theories that focus primarily on CONSEQUENCES in determining moral rightness and wrongness are called ________.
A. virtue ethics B. deontological ethics
C. utilitarianism D. teleological ethics

A

D. teleological ethics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The view that holds that there are NO universally valid moral principles, but that such principles are HUMAN INVENTIONS, is which of the following?
A. moral objectivism B. ethical relativism
C. ethnocentrism D. ethical nihilism

A

B. ethical relativism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

One ought to pay one’s taxes.

A

Legal (L) or Ethical (E)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

That is a worthless piece of art because it says nothing and expresses nothing.

A

Aesthetic (A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What he did was praiseworthy because it was so selfless

A

Ethical (E)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

You ought to stand when the Queen enters the room.

A

Custom (C)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

More people now than twenty years ago believe that the death penalty is sometimes justified.

A

Descriptive (D)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

We ought to respect our elders because it is the right thing to do

A

Normative (N)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

It would not be right to decorate a room with furniture from two different historical periods.

A

Normative (N)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Which type of ethics analyzes and asks the meaning and function of ethical terms such as “good” or “right” and ethical statements such as “This is Good.”
(1) Normative ethics (NE), or (2) Metaethics (M)

A

Metaethics (M)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The statement “More than half the people in this country believe that giving military aid to foreign governments is wrong”

A

Descriptive (D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

That type of ethics which holds that an act is never justified by its consequences, the end does not justify the means: Teleological (T) or Deontological (D) ethics?

A

Deontological (D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Although you intended well, what you did was bad because it caused more harm than good

A

Consequentialist (C)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Students ought not to cheat on their ethics test because if everyone cheated then the test grades would not mean anything.

A

Consequentialist (C)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

It is only fair that you give him a chance for the position.

A

Non-consequentialist (NC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
To say that Sue has a right to know the truth is to give a consequentialist reason for being honest.
b. False
26
Looking at the source of an opinion instead of the reason given for it is called begging the question.
b. False
27
While emotions or feelings may play some role in moral considerations, one is also expected to give reasons for one's moral judgments.
a. True
28
Recommending a certain behavior such as sharing due to one’s own approval of that behavior is known as emotivism.
a. True
29
According to the text, one reason why we study ethics is to see whether we can justify the beliefs we already hold.
a. True
30
Ethics is exclusively a descriptive discipline.
b. False
31
Ethics is that branch of philosophy that is concerned with how we ought to live, with the idea of the good, and with the meaning of such concepts as right and wrong.
a. True
32
"People often find it difficult to do what they believe is right" is a normative statement.
b. False
33
Ethics is that branch of philosophy that seeks to discover what different moral beliefs different people do in fact have.
b. False
34
Ethical considerations always start from the top, in other words, with the formulation of ethical principles or basic ethical values.
b. False
35
The following is an example of normative ethics: "Capital punishment is wrong because it is wrong to directly take a human life."
a. True
36
An ethical theory is a systematic exposition of a particular view about what is the nature and basis of good or right.
a. True
37
In doing metaethics one analyzes the meaning and function of ethical language.
a. True
38
Descriptive morality has to do with describing how people SHOULD live.
_F
39
Even though some aspects of morality are not covered by law, morality sometimes overrides law.
T
40
Ethics is a discipline that ask questions, such as, “what is beauty?”
F
41
Philosophy literally means “the love of ethics”.
F
42
Etiquette does not get at the heart of what it means to live a good life.
T
43
Applied ethics does not deal with controversial moral problems.
F
44
According to Martha Nussbaum, the central capacities a. provide the basis of respect for differences. b. Can be realized independent of individual taste. c. Can each be concretely realized in different ways. d. Are contradictory to living an ethical life.
c. Can each be concretely realized in different ways.
45
Strong ethical relativism holds that a. There is no objective right and wrong. b. Right and wrong are not really knowable. c. Some actions are more right than others. d. All actions are equally moral.
a. There is no objective right and wrong.
46
___ 3. Which is not a reason for supporting ethical relativism a. Moral uncertainty. b. Diversity of moral views. c. Situational differences. d. Social cohesion.
d. Social cohesion.
47
Absolutism is described as the view that a. It is impossible to know somethings. b. What is good in a concrete case differs from person to person. c. Moral principles are independent of contexts. d. There are no universal norms.
c. Moral principles are independent of contexts.
48
According to W.D. Ross, the fact that there are several prima facie duties means a. That ethical absolutism is the correct approach. b. There is a hierarchical structure to the universal value system. c. That we are obligated to fulfill all of them. d. That there will be conflicts of values.
d. That there will be conflicts of values.
49
The view that holds that there are NO universally valid moral principles, but that such principles are HUMAN INVENTIONS, is which of the following? A. moral objectivism B. ethical relativism C. ethnocentrism D. ethical nihilism
B. ethical relativism
50
A person who holds the view that there are NON-OVERRIDEABLE moral principles that one ought NEVER violate and that moral principles are EXCEPTIONLESS would be known as: A. moral objectivist B. moderate objectivist C. moral absolutist D. natural law theorist
C. moral absolutist
51
The theory that denies universal ethical principles altogether is known as:: A. moral objectivistism B. moderate objectivism C. ethical relativism D. ethical situationalism
C. ethical relativism
52
Is the relativist necessarily more tolerant than the objectivist?
The cultural relativist might preach tolerance if that were thought by his or her society to be good. He or she could not say that it is really good to be tolerant, but only that in that society it is good to be tolerant. The objectivist could hold that one ought to be tolerant because it is really or objectively good to be tolerant
53
How would an objectivist respond to the subjectivist/ relativist argument that there is no objective right and wrong because people never agree about what is right and wrong.
They might give other examples of cases in which we do not agree about something, such as the date of the death of George Washington, and then explain that this disagreement does not prove that he did not die! Or they might offer that we argue and disagree about many things because we think that there is an answer and we want to convince the other or find out what it is.
54
How could one be an objectivist or nonrelativist and yet hold that what is right in some circumstances is wrong or bad in others?
One could hold both if the objective value that one believed in, such as happiness or freedom, were some very general value. Then this value might be furthered or realized differently in different situations. What promoted happiness in one circumstance might not do so in others, and what furthered freedom in some setting might not do so in other places. Such is the case with weak interpretations of ethical relativism.
55
According to the text, the essence of both descriptive and ethical relativism is the belief that people do differ fundamentally about what is right and wrong.
b. False
56
Social or cultural relativism holds that what is right is whatever one's society or culture holds is right.
a. True
57
According to individual ethical relativism, I cannot be objectively mistaken in my moral judgments.
a. True
58
. If people disagree about some moral matter, their disagreement will always be due to their having different moral values.
b. False
59
Richard Rorty argues that there is no algorithm to determine precise answers about which beliefs are better than others.
a. True
60
Weak forms of ethical relativism hold that there are objective moral principles, even though they will need to be applied differently in different contexts.
a. True
61
The belief that what is right in some circumstances is not necessarily right in others cannot be held by ethical objectivists.
b. False
62
ccording to the text, moral skeptics hold that it is difficult or impossible to know what is good or bad, right or wrong.
a. True
63
Moral pluralists hold that there are many different ultimate values but also argue whether some rank higher than others.
b. False
64
Strong ethical relativism holds that there is no objective good or bad, right or wrong.
a. True
65
Shared moral agreements can result in different conclusions when people have different factual agreements.
a. True
66
Subjectivism or Individual Relativism says that ALL moral principles are justified by virtue of their acceptance by an individual agent (or person).
a. True
67
Cultural Relativism says that all moral principles are justified by virtue of their cultural acceptance.
a. True
68
The Diversity Thesis (or “Diversity of Moral Views”) says that what is considered morally right and wrong DIFFERS from society to society, so there are no universal moral standards held by all societies.
a. True
69
Another name for Subjectivism is Cultural Relativism.
b. False
70
Cultural Relativism leads to the absurdity that one person could be Morally right AND morally wrong at the same time.
a. True
71
Moral ABSOLUTISM says that there are some moral principles that should NEVER be violated.
a. True
72
Moral objectivists claim that each moral principle must be weighed to other moral principles depending on the circumstances.
a. True
73
All of the following are used to evaluate ethical egoism except a. Grounding in Psychological egoism. b. Consistency and coherence. c. Conformity to commonsense morality. d. Effectiveness in satisfying individual interest.
c. Conformity to commonsense morality.
74
According to individual ethical egoism one should a. Ignore the needs of others. b. Help others to help themselves. c. Do what is in one's self interest. d. Do what makes one happy at the moment.
c. Do what is in one's self interest.
75
What does Glaucon want to demonstrate by giving two people rings? a. Even "good" people will do evil if they can act without consequence. b. The people have a deep bond with each other. c. The people are children of the king. d. People can be trusted with great power.
a. Even "good" people will do evil if they can act without | consequence.
76
Which of the following is not an example of ethical egoism? a. We should treat others well because we want to be treated well in return. b. We should treat others well so they will treat others well. c. We should work hard because a "job well done is its own reward." d. We should work hard because doing so is a good model for our children.
b. We should treat others well so they will treat others | well.
77
According to psychological egoism people a. Act in ways that are harmful to them. b. Often act against their own self interests. c. Act in the way they perceive to be best for them. d. Act out of deep subconscious needs.
c. Act in the way they perceive to be best for them.
78
In the story questioning Lincoln's ability to be selfless, Lincoln a. Talked to the family of a fallen soldier. b. Rescued a pig. c. Entered the fight about Texas' right to become a slave state. d. Ignored a person in need.
b. Rescued a pig.
79
The ring of Gyges can best be described as which of the following? a. A ring of inheritance indicating royalty. b. A ring that represents a committed romance. c. A ring that cam make the wearer invisible. d. A geological formation in ancient Greece
c. A ring that cam make the wearer invisible.
80
For psychological egoism to be valid, we must show people a. Act with an aim of achieving self-satisfaction. b. Get self-satisfaction from their actions. c. Use others in selfish ways. d. Need to make other people happy
a. Act with an aim of achieving self-satisfaction.
81
The view that the perfection of one's abilities in a state of happiness is the highest goal for humans and that we have a moral duty to attempt to reach this goal is held by: A. Rand B. Plato C. Hobbes D. Medlin
A. Rand
82
The theory that holds that we should sometimes put other peoples' interests above our own is ________. A. ethical egoism B. psychological egosim C. altruism D. virtue ethics
C. altruism
83
The argument that states that in order to reach the goal of egoism, a person must give up egoism and become an altruist, is the: A. inconsistent outcomes argument B. problem of future generations C. paradox of ethical egoism D. argument from counterintuitive consequences
C. paradox of ethical egoism
84
``` Considering posterity (future generations), ethical egoists say: A. future people matter B. you are obligated not to care C. Be an altruist D. you should only look out for people related to you ```
B. you are obligated not to care
85
The view that says social structures and behavioral patterns are biologically based and explained by evolutionary theory: A. sociological ethics B. evolutionary egoism C. altruism D. Pro-social behaviors
D. Pro-social behaviors
86
Is ethical egoism contrary to commonsense morality?
One could answer yes and no with reasons. Ethical egoism might be considered contrary to commonsense morality in the sense that if it were true, then many things we generally think are wrong would be right. Among these are torturing innocent children and lying to suit one's interests. On the other hand, there might be some truth to the assertion that we ought to take better care of ourselves than we do and pursue our real best interests rather than things not actually good for us.
87
Why did Falk not think that a person who was taught that she should not lie because if she did others would not trust her would not have been given a moral reason?
Falk thinks that a person who was taught that she should not lie because if she did others would not trust her would not have been given a moral reason because taking a moral point of view moves us beyond self-interested reasons to a concern for the rights and interests of others or to a position that lying is objectionable in itself.
88
The counsels in Benjamin Franklin's Poor Richard's Almanac were examples of how practicing certain virtues was in a person's own best interest. a. True b. False
a. True
89
Psychological egoism is a descriptive theory and ethical egoism is a normative theory. a. True b. False
a. True
90
Ayn Rand held a negative view of altruism. a. True b. False
a. True
91
Psychological egoism is a theory that holds that we each ought to do what is in our own best interest. a. True b. False
b. False
92
To say that something is a normative theory is to say that it tells us what we ought to do. a. True b. False
a. True
93
One form of psychological egoism asserts that we always try do what we think is in our own best interest. a. True b. False
a. True
94
One reason that people don't always do what is best for them is weakness of will. a. True b. False
a. True
95
According to W. D. Falk, one would be given a good moral education if one were taught to Be prudent. a. True b. False
b. False
96
The story of Mr. Lincoln was supposed to illustrate the truth of ethical egoism. a. True b. False
b. False ethical egoism states this
97
Psychological egoism states that all people OUGHT to seek their own self interests.
False
98
Criticisms of the argument from satisfaction state that it confuses a CONSEQUENCE of action (satisfaction experienced) with the PURPOSE of the action (to help someone in need).
True
99
The view that all people OUGHT to seek their own self-interests is called ethical egoism.
True
100
The Argument from Self-Deception says that although we think we do things for others, we are DECEIVING OURSELVES – we are always selfish.
True
101
The Paradox of Hedonism states that the only way to attain happiness is to seek it
False the best way is to “forget it” (or seek something else)
102
Hobbes argues that selfishness is BOTH the cause and solution to societies' problems.
True
103
The Inconsistent Outcomes Argument (“Consistency versus Cohesiveness”) makes the case that, as an ethical egoist, I must both universalize my desire to defeat “Tom” in, say, a competition of some sort, AND, AT THE SAME TIME, universalize that he defeat me
True