Test #1 Flashcards
Legislative Referral
- measure placed on ballot by legislature, required for certain measures
- i.e. changes to the state constitution, bond measures and tax changes (in some states)
- reasons: amend constitution, avoid gubernatorial veto, appear democratic, political agenda, avoid supermajority req.
Initiative
- measure placed on ballot following public petition to bypass state legislature
- procedure: file petition, review petition, prepare title and summary, get signatures, verify signatures
Initiative Process (Differences)
- what can be initiated varies by state
- some states have waiting periods
- percentage of signatures for statutory and constitutional initiatives varies by state (const. usually higher than stat.)
- some states have geographic distribution requirements
Basic Forms of Direct Democracy
- recall
- referendum
- legislative referral
- initiative
Direct Democracy
- a “safety valve” for ideas of citizens - allows issues to go through the initiative process
- “where progressive and conservative populists clash”
Geographic Distribution
- signatures must be gathered from around the state
- varying requirements among states (part of initiative process)
- demonstrates statewide support
- may place unfair burden on initiative proponents
Direct Democracy in Oregon (background)
- adopted by American Populist and Progressive political groups
- in order to challenge: special interest groups, undemocratic influences in the electoral process, influence of big corporations on elected representatives
Recall
- removes elected official from office before term ends
- procedure: file an application, circulate recall petition, submit petition (sig. verification), recall election
- very rare, often political, percentage of signatures varies by state
Direct Democracy in Oregon (limitations)
For ideas from citizens:
- no limitations on what can go on ballot
- no requirements on where money will come from
- no requirements on feasibility
- no required debate, amendment, or review
- no constitutionality test
Direct Democracy in Oregon (Legislative and Supreme Court role)
- limited role
- single constitutional amendment (Armatta v. Kitzhaber, 1998)
- signature verification system (Lemons v. Bradbury, 2008)
- legislative tampering
Armatta v. Kitzhaber (1998)
- a single constitutional amendment measure cannot affect more than a single clause of the Constitution
- led to the challenge of multiple measures
- led to the Secretary of State becoming more active in rejecting measures
- may encourage statutory initiatives instead of constitutional amendments
Lemons v. Bradbury (2008)
- initiative to repeal the state’s domestic partnership law
* upheld the sampling method as the only practical way of signature verification
Legislative Tampering
Oregon legislature is allowed to repeal or amend a law passed by voters using the initiative process, but use this very sparingly because:
- changes must follow ordinary legislative process
- general unwillingness
- requires a higher vote number
Politics of the Campaign Stage (Initiative Process)
- money
* commercials, websites, general advertising (emotional appeals, symbolism, “cherry-picking” facts)
Referendum
- voters ask to approve or repeal an act of legislature by ballot
- procedure: gather signatures, law appears on ballot, it is either approved or rejected
- signatures and time limitations for approval vary in different states
“Shopping” of Ballot Titles
- changing the language of a ballot to get just the right words
- appeal from Attorney General to Oregon Supreme Court
Direct Democracy Pros
- circumvents legislature
- allows public to address neglected issues
- promotes political participation
Direct Democracy Cons
- special interests control the process
- lack of voter knowledge
- filter for untested ideas and compromises
Role of Money in the Initiative Process
- symbolism
- political reasons
- easier if measures cost less
- high spending on campaigns
- money helps with advertising - commercials, ads, mailers, websites
Boutique Measures
Single-source financial support for a ballot measure
Direct Democracy in Oregon (Possible Reforms)
- changing required number of signatures
- requiring supermajorities to participate
- requiring measure to pass in multiple years
- require wide geographical signatures or support
- limiting frequency of ideas
- regulate campaign process
- allowing electronic signatures
“Laboratories of Democracy”
States have the ability to experiment with policy without interference from the federal government.
Decisions are based on:
- wealth of the state
- individual state’s political system
- internal and external support
State vs. Federal Government
States can provide:
- health care
- public safety
- corrections facilities
States are larger and employ more people