Test 1 Flashcards
Cardinal Virtues
- prudence (wisdom)
- justice
- fortitude
- temperance
Non-cardinal virtues
Fidelity to Trust
Compassion
Integrity
Effacement of self-interest
obstacles to moral ethical reasoning
- different facts
- Different values: (Culture & Religion)
- Different emotions: (Fear, Anger, Guilt, & Denial)
- Different reasoning: (Consequences & Liability)
- Different loyalties: (Patient, Institution, & Society)
- Different perceptions: (Personal or professional experiences)
fundamental principles from AMA
- Primacy of patient welfare****
- Patient autonomy
- Social justice
define virtue (ethics)
need to do good with our purpose (intent) and do good in perormance- not being told to do the right thing but WANTING to do the right thing
-what does my HEART tell me to do?
- Application of the Virtues
- Clinicians committed to Ethics of Care hold themselves accountable for well-being of patients
- Emphasis is on quality care as a distinct moral obligation
goals of medicine
- Promotion of health and disease prevention
- Maintenance/improvement of quality of life by relief of symptoms, pain and suffering
- Cure of disease
- Prevention of untimely death
- Improvement of functional status/ maintenance of compromised status
- Education/counseling about condition/prognosis
- Avoidance of harm to patient in course of care
- Providing relief and support near time of death
evaluating ethical problems things to think about
- Medical indications-beneficence and non-maleficence
- Patient preferences- respect autonomy, mental capacity
- Quality of Life-respect autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence
- Contextual features-loyalty fairness
Principle based ethics:
- Beneficence – Duty of health care providers to be of benefit to patient – healing – to make whole again
- Nonmaleficence – Requires caregivers to avoid causing patients harm
- Autonomy – Patient must indicate willingness to accept treatment; Relates to self-determination and informed consent
- Justice – Obligation to be fair;Fairness with goods and services in short supply
central question of principle based?
what am i obligated to do?
analysis of principle based:
Rational, analytic, problem-solving focus
Imposes no general conception of the good on individuals
Focus on action*
Central question – what am I obligated to do?”
Tends to reduce ethics to quandaries or dilemmas
required reporting for public safety (break in confidentiality for good of whole)
STDs
gunshot/stab
child or elder abuse
subpena purpose and what it is not
forced release of record BUT it is NOT A COURT ORDER (MUST have release from pateint) an atorney asks for the info - but can say no
practical wisdom in med
- pursuit of worthwhile ( ends) goals
- accurate perception of concrete circumstances
- committment to morla principles and virtues
- deliberation that integrates end goals
- motivation to act in order to achieve the conclusions
goals in med again but dif
- preventing diseases and injury and promoting health
- relieving pain and suffering caused by disease and injury
- caring and curing
- avoiding premature death and pursuing a peaceful death
intervening
should not just straight to the intervention… we need to udnerstand the condition and WHAT THE GOAL IS PRIOR TO MAKING A MOVE
-intervention gets too much attention and the goal gets too little attention
GOAL CAREs toward the end of life
1) be cured
2) live longer
3) improve or maintain function
4) be comfortable
5) achieve life goals
6) provide support for family/caregiver
7) clarify daignosis or prognosis
good physicians with end of life
they know how t ogently transition the family into the process
decision making needs to include talk about
probability of outcomes and willingness to endure suffering
wise clinical judgement asks:
How will this help achieve the patient’s goals
clinical judgement is a form of
practical wisdom
What are judgements based on?
1) principles of duty = moral obligation (action may be rigt even if it doesnt promote greates balance of good over evil)
2) consequences=what goods are worth pursuiing (action is right if it promotes the greatest possible balance of good over evil)
3) virtues=about persons, motives, intetions,and traits of character (an action is right if it is what a virtuous person would do in the circumstances)
compartmentatlization
we put on a different role when we need to… NOT GOOD. NEED TO BE WHOLE. Ex) Nazi doctors did horrible things at work and then went home to families to be good fathers… say whattt?
unifed people need to integrate…
personal views and professional views (… avoiding compartmentalization)
being a doc means…
give info
make recommendation
persuasion can cross into manipulation and coercion (No-No’s)
conscientious practice need to recognize
- importance of individualy conscinece
- priority of the patient: intrinsic vulnerability, profess-ionals, pateints priority is not absolute
- our responsibilty to society
medicines social “contract”
a bunch of unwritten codes bw professions and society that are constantly evolving
legal regulation
state licensure
hospitals-restricting and limiting practice
professional organizations
malpractice legislation
confidentiality
cant give out sensitive patient info
priveledge
phys cant be forced to testify info about patient in course of treatmtnet
exceptions to duty of confidentiality
- patient permission( written release)
- danger to public or an indiv
- mandatory reporting statues
- legal process
- “treatment, payment, and health care operation (HIPPA)
- independent med eval
parent does not have a right to childs med record in divorce situation if
child is seeking care for addiction, contraception, or STI
minor definition
child under 18 who is unmarried and childless and is not living separately from parents with independaent financial support
care is owned to who?
the vulnerable regardless of anyones personal opinion
patient doctor relationship is part of a larger culture that frames relationship on
the consumer model
when is not preventing a preventable harm an injustice?
when basic human needs are not med - no food, clean water, education, safety…
what do we owe others?
we should help them out!
people behave in healthy ways when
they hang out with others who behave health
people do not behave morally because of
havibng the correct beliefs. All the same
key to bahving morlaly?
surround yourself with people who CHALLENGE you and your ideas.
three commonly encountered ehtical issues at end of life care:
withholding/withdrawin care
medical futility
assistnace with dying
Support Study:
- half of conscious patients had moderate to severe pain at least 1/2 of time before death
- 31% of pts did not wish to have CPR but physicians were not aware of DNR order pref
- nearly half of DNR orders were written within 2 days of pt death
- 40% of pt spent at least 10 days in ICU
- POOR SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
- INCONSISTENT WITH PT PREFERENCES AND VALUES
- PROBLEMATIC COMMUNICATION AND DECISION MAKING
- LIFE-PROLONGING, INTENSIVE TREATMENT VS PALLIATIVE/HOSPICE CARE
Teno Study:
- 1/4 people who died did not receive enough pain meds or none at all.
- inadequate pain management was 1.6 times more likely in nursing home than hospice care
- 1/2 patients did not receive enough emotional support. 1.3x more likely if in an institution
- 1/4 respondents expressed concern over phys communication and treatment options
- 21% complained that the dying person was not always treated with respect.compared to homecare setting in a nursing home 2.6x higher and 3x higher in hospital
- 1/3 respondents said family members did not receive enoguh emotional support. 1.5x more likely in nursing home/hospital than at home
first questions to ask at PT end of life
- What is the patients GOAL?
- what else can we OFFER this patient?
- What else can we do here?
the object of all clinical decision making is first to:
secure the health, well-being or good dying of the pt and to do this in a manner that respects the integrity of all participants inthe decision making process
issues to address when thinnking of pt EOL goal?
risks, benefits, burdens, probabilities
Phys are good at talking about risks and benefits but not the other two.
euthanasia vs phys assisted suicide?
doctor does the killing (NOT LEGAL) vs doc gives pt the stuff to kill themselves (OREGON MONTANTA WASHINGTON)
passive euthanasia
- not beginning treatment that would provide a benefit to pt
- withdrawing treatment that has been shown to be inffective
THE INTENT NEEDS TO BE TO KILL. IF YOURE WITHDRAWING TREATMENT=NO EUTHENASIA