Test 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Common Law

A

Principles and rules of law that derive their authority not from legislation but from community usage and custom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

invasion of privacy

A

A civil tort that emerged in the early 20th century and contains four distinct categories of legal wrongs: appropriation, intrusion, publication of private facts and false light.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

equity

A

A system of jurisprudence, distinct from common law, in which courts are empowered to decide cases on the basis of equity or fairness and are not bound by the rigid precedents that often exist in common law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Damages

A

Money awarded to the winning party in a civil lawsuit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

statutory construction

A

The process undertaken by courts to interpret or construe the meaning of statutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Common law is also known as

A

Judge made law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stare decisis

A

“Let the decision stand.” This concept is the operating principle in the common-law system and requires that judges follow precedent case law when making judgments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

precedent

A

An established rule of law set by a previous case. Courts should follow precedent when it is advisable and possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Four options for following precedent

A
  1. Accept/follow
  2. Modify/update
  3. Distinguish
  4. Overrule
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Typical remedies in Equity Law

A
  1. Temporary restraining order
  2. Preliminary Injunction
  3. Permanent Injunction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Equity Law

A

A system of jurisprudence, distinct from common law, in which courts are empowered to decide cases on the basis of equity or fairness and are not bound by the rigid precedents that often exist in common law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

judicial decree

A

A judgment of a court of equity; a declaration of the court announcing the legal consequences of the facts found to be true by the court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Statutes

A

Laws adopted by legislative bodies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Statutory Law

A

Law created by elected legislative bodies at the local, state, and federal level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

constitution

A

A written outline of the organization of a government that provides for both the rights and responsibilities of various branches of the government and the limits of the power of the government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

void for vagueness doctrine

A

A statute or regulation is unconstitutional if it is so vague that a person of reasonable and ordinary intelligence would not know, from looking at its terms, what speech is allowed and what speech is prohibited.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

overbreadth doctrine

A

A statute or regulation will be declared unconstitutional if it sweeps up and bans a substantial amount of protected speech in the process of targeting unprotected speech; in other words, the doctrine prohibits the government from banning unprotected speech if a substantial amount of protected speech is prohibited or chilled in the same process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

administrative agency

A

An agency, created and funded by Congress, whose members are appointed by the president and whose function is to administer specific legislation, such as law regulating, broadcasting and advertising.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

trial court

A

Normally the first court to hear a lawsuit. This court is the forum in which the facts are determined and the law is initially applied, as opposed to an appellate court, to which decisions are appealed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

appellate court

A

A court that has both original and appellate jurisdiction; a court to which cases are removed for an appeal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

original jurisdiction

A

Jurisdiction in the first instance, as distinguished from appellate jurisdiction. A court exercising original jurisdiction determines both the facts and the law in the case; courts exercising appellate jurisdiction may rule only on the law and the sufficiency of the facts as determined by a trial court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

direct appeal

A

The statutorily granted right of an aggrieved party to carry the appeal of a case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The high court can deny this right if the appeal lacks a substantial federal question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

writ of certiorari

A

A writ by which an appellant seeks the review of a case by the U.S. Supreme Court. When the writ is granted, the court will order the lower court to send up the record of the case for review.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

petitioner

A

One who petitions a court to take an action; someone who starts a lawsuit or carries an appeal to a higher court (appellant). This person is the opposite of a respondent, one who responds to a petition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

rule of four

A

At least four justices of the U.S. Supreme Court must agree to hear a case before a petition for a writ of certiorari will be granted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

split of authority

A

A disagreement among lower courts on the same legal issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Opinion of the court

A

Majority Opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

concurring opinion

A

A written opinion by an appellate judge or justice in which the author agrees with the decision of the court but normally states reasons different from those in the court opinion as the basis for his or her decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

dissenting opinion

A

A written opinion by a judge or justice who disagrees with the appellate court’s decision in a case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

plurality opinion

A

A Supreme Court opinion in which five justices cannot agree on a single majority opinion—there is no opinion of the court—but that is joined by more justices than any other opinion in the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

strict scrutiny

A

The standard of judicial review for content-based statutes, requiring the government to prove that it has a compelling interest (an interest of the highest order) in regulating the speech at issue and that the means of serving that interest are narrowly tailored such that no more speech is restricted than is necessary to serve the allegedly compelling interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

intermediate scrutiny

A

The standard of judicial review for content-neutral laws, such as time, place and manner regulations, that requires the government to prove that the regulation is content neutral; justified by a substantial interest; not a complete ban on communication; and narrowly tailored.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

per curiam opinion

A

An unsigned court opinion. The author of the opinion is not known outside the court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

prior restraint

A

Prepublication censorship that forbids publication or broadcast of certain objectionable material, as opposed to punishment of a perpetrator after the material has been published or broadcast.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

seditious libel

A

Libeling the government; criticizing the government or government officers. It is sometimes called sedition.

36
Q

jury nullification

A

The controversial power of a jury, despite its sworn duty under oath to apply a law as interpreted and instructed by a judge, to instead ignore (and thereby to “nullify”) a law and decide a case according to its own conscience and sensibilities or, as the U.S. Supreme Court once put it, the ability of a jury to acquit “in the teeth of both law and facts.”

37
Q

symbolic speech doctrine

A

The two-part judicial test used to determine when conduct rises to the level of “speech” within the meaning of the First Amendment. The person engaging in the conduct must intend to convey a particularized message with his or her conduct, and there must be a substantial likelihood, under the circumstances in which the conduct takes place, that some members of the audience will understand the meaning that was intended.

38
Q

absolutist theory

A

The proposition that the First Amendment is an absolute, and that government may adopt no laws whatsoever that abridge freedom of expression.

39
Q

fighting words doctrine

A

A legal doctrine that permits prior censorship of words that create a clear and present danger of inciting an audience to disorder or violence.

40
Q

counterspeech

A

The preferred remedy for speech that we disagree with is not censorship, but to add more speech to the marketplace of ideas in order to counter it or to rebut it.

41
Q

Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798

A

Laws adopted by the Federalist Congress aimed at stopping criticism of the national government by Republican or Jeffersonian editors and politicians.

42
Q

Espionage Act

A

A law adopted by Congress in 1917 that outlawed criticism of the U.S. government and its participation in World War I in Europe.

43
Q

Sedition Act of 1918

A

An amendment to the Espionage Act adopted in the midst of World War I that severely limited criticism of the government and criticism of U.S. participation in the European war.

44
Q

Smith Act

A

A federal law adopted in 1940 that makes it illegal to advocate the violent overthrow of the government.

45
Q

content-neutral regulation

A

A law that applies regardless of the content, topic or subject matter of a message. Content-neutral regulations are subject to intermediate scrutiny judicial review.

46
Q

content-neutral regulation

A

A law that applies regardless of the content, topic or subject matter of a message. Content-neutral regulations are subject to intermediate scrutiny judicial review.

47
Q

time, place and manner restrictions or rules

A

Rules, when justified by a substantial government interest, that can regulate the time, place and manner of speaking or publishing and the distribution of printed material.

48
Q

viewpoint-based discrimination

A

The worst form of content-based regulation that exists when the government censors or regulates one particular viewpoint or side on a given topic or issue but does not censor or regulate another viewpoint or side on the same topic or issue. For instance, if the government censored pro-life speech on the topic of abortion but did not censor pro-choice speech on the topic of abortion, that would constitute viewpoint-based discrimination. Viewpoint-based discrimination by the government on speech is always unconstitutional.

49
Q

commercial speech doctrine

A

The legal doctrine that states that truthful advertising for products and services that are not illegal is normally protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

50
Q

per curiam opinion

A

An unsigned court opinion. The author of the opinion is not known outside the court.

51
Q

Tinker

A

School officials may regulate speech that they reasonably believe will materially and substantially disrupt or interfere with classwork, educational activities, discipline or the rights of other students

52
Q

Hazelwood

A

Schools may regulate speech that is school sponsored and/or that is part of the school curriculum, so long as the censorship is reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical (teaching/learning) concerns.

53
Q

Bethel

A

Schools may regulate sexually offensive speech that is lewd, vulgar, or idecent (they also can regulate obscene speech since it is without any First Amendment protection; the case’s language about speech that “would undermine the school’s basic educational mission” also is used successfully by some schools to ban images and ads for drugs, tobacco, and alcohol).

54
Q

true threats

A

A category of speech that is not protected by the First Amendment. Statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular person or group of people.

55
Q

heckler’s veto

A

A situation that occurs when the audience’s negative, adverse and sometimes violent reaction to the message conveyed by a peaceful speaker is allowed to control and silence the speaker. The duty, instead, should be on the government to protect the speaker rather than to allow a “veto” of the speech by the audience.

56
Q

U.S. Constitution

A

addresses wrongs of previous rule and establish representative gov

57
Q

Weakness of articles of confederation

A

Had too weak of a central gov, no taxes or military

58
Q

Bill of Right

A

Is the first 10 amendments and limits the fed gov’s power- which was thought to prevent tyranny

59
Q

13th Amendment

A

Abolishes slavery (1865)

60
Q

14th Amendment

A

Protects rights of many freed slaves and all citizens (due to equal protection)

61
Q

19th Amendment

A

Grants women the right to vote (1920)

62
Q

Administrative Law

A

Rules and regulations from administrative agencies (FCC, FTC, etc)

63
Q

Executive Orders

A

From the executive branch

64
Q

Marbury v. Madison, ussc (1803)

A

Judicial review

65
Q

Plessy v. Ferguson

A

Ruled states do have right to segregate train cars used “separate but equal”

66
Q

Brown v. Board of Education

A

“Separate but equal” has no place in educational facilities are inherently unequal. Didn’t follow stare decisis

67
Q

Trial Court

A

Has a jury, more emotional appeals to the jury. Trier of fact.

68
Q

Appellate Court

A

Appeal to the court, only contains judges. No new facts are established.

69
Q

Federal court system:

A

94 U.S. District Courts (Trail courts)
13 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals
1 Supreme Court

70
Q

Criminal Law

A

Beyond a reasonable doubt

71
Q

Civil Law

A

By a preponderance of the evidence
-is the defendant responsible?
-At least more than 50% that the defendant is liable

72
Q

How many requests does the supreme court get a session?

A

Thousands but the only hear 100 or so each session

73
Q

Prior to Gitlow V. New York

A

1st amend was only applied to the federal gov, so state govs in the osuth banned publications about abolition

74
Q

Gitlow V. New York, USSC (1925)

A

Protects citizens from acts of the state. Extends “congress” to state and local gov

75
Q

Near v. Minnesota, USSC (1931)

A

Newspaper published heavy accusations against gov corruption. State public nuisance law shut down newspaper for “scandalous/defamatory material. Went to the Supreme Court which rules the gov was using prior restraint and Gitlow was allowed to publish.

76
Q

When can the gov use prior restraint to punish a newspaper?

A

Under exceptional circumstances (5-4 decision on the supreme court determines if there are exceptional circumstances)

77
Q

New York Times V. United States, USSC (1971)

A

-“Pentagon Papers Case”
-Study revealed presidents lied about status of Vietnam War
-Classified docs were leaked to NY times and Washington Post
-NY times was prevented from publishing
-Supreme court ruled they were allowed to and that prior restraint is not often permissable

78
Q

Rational review

A

Courts presume the constitutionality of laws are reasonable, most laws are reviewed under rational review and courts use minimal scrutiny

79
Q

Texas v. Johnson, USSC (1989)

A

Johnson burned U.S. flag during protest. Statue prohibited flag burning. Court used strict scrutiny and affirmed Johnson’s free speech.

80
Q

United States v. Eichman, USSC (1990)

A

congress has passed Flag Protection Act, Supreme Court overturned flag protection act

81
Q

United States v. O’Brien, USSC (1968)

A

-O’Brien burned his draft card
-convicted at the fed level
-USSC ruled it was symbolic speech, but it wasn’t protected
-court used intermediate scrutiny

82
Q

Three types of public forums

A

-traditional public forum
-designated public forum
-nonpublic forum

83
Q

Traditional public forum

A

-parks, streets, and sidewalks next to public buildings
-Appropriate time, place, and manner restrictions many apply so long as they are content neutral

84
Q

Designated Public Forum

A

-A designated public forum is sometimes available for first amendment activities
-Gov ensures the use doesn’t interfere with the primary function of the property
-Has time, place, manner restrictions

85
Q

Nonpublic Forum

A

Areas that aren’t available for traditional 1st amend activities (prisons, post office hallways, military bases)

86
Q

Private Property

A

Doesn’t have to open property to 1st amend activities

87
Q

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, USSC (1942)

A

Chaplinsky called cop “fascist and racketeer” and was arrested for disturbing the peace
-Conviction was upheld