Test 1 Flashcards
The rowley case
Plaintiffs argued that appropriateness maximizing the potienal of their child
Reasonably calculated to enable child to achieve passing marks and advance grade from grade
1982
Zero reject
Philosophical basis for the concept of an fape. No child should be rejected or denied the opportunity for schooling because of disability
Fape
All handicapped children have free appropriate public education which emphases special education and related services
Started under rehabilitation act 1973
Section 504 v ada
Section 504
School districts provide free appropriate Public education to qualified students in their jurisdictions who have disability
Ada 1990
Provide comprehensive civil rights protection to individuals with disabilities
No child left behind
2002, requires all schools to test all students including Students with individualazed education programs and 504 plans
Held accountable for how Students have learned and achieved
Role of federal law in education
Passes education related laws
Implemented through regulations
Hartman v London county
1994
Judge found decision to move mark h from 2nd grade class violated federal law
Education for all handicapped children act
V
Idea
Edha 1975
Congress attempted to guarantee no discrimination testing procedures
Idea 2004
Requires evaluation guidelines
Iep v ifsp
Iep
Written statement designed to meet a students unique needs
Ifsp
Written plan that guides service for a child who is younger than 3
Least restrictive environment
Kids who get special education should be in sams classroom as peer
Due process
Formal procedures used to decide disagreements between Parents and district
Substative
Individual rights under the law
Dispute resolution
2004
Idea to provide parents opportunities to discuss their complaints along with what led to such
Procedural violations
Enforce an individuals rights
Mattie t v Holliday
1979
Inappropriate placement in special education settings
