Test 1 Flashcards
What is the meaning of designated agency in the context of the standard form listing agreement?
- The licensee cannot act for both the buyer and seller.
- The licensee can act for both the buyer and seller
- The brokerage and its agents have been designated to act as a team for the buyer.
- The brokerage appoints one or more specific licensees to act as the seller’s sole agent.
Option (4) is the correct answer because under designated agency, while the contracting party is still the brokerage, the seller agrees that the brokerage will appoint one or more specific licensees to act as the seller’s sole agent.
Options
(1) and (2) are incorrect because dual agency, not designated agency, relates to whether a licensee can or cannot act for both the buyer and seller. Option (3) is incorrect because a listing agreement involves the seller but not the buyer.
[Chapter 11]
delete
delete
Of the following methods, which one MUST be used to determine the market value of an unused vacant site?
- Cost approach of appraisal
- Comparative approach of appraisal
- Income approach of appraisal
- Depreciation approach of appraisal
Option (2) is the correct answer as vacant land can only be appraised using the comparative approach.
Which of the following was created by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC)?
- Virtual banks
- Ginnie Mae Mortgage-Backed Securities
- Canada Housing Trust Bonds
- Credit unions
Option (3) is correct because in 2001, CMC launched Canada Mortgage Bonds to increase the supply of low cost mortgage funds in Canada, and provide easy access to investment in Canadian residential mortgages. The Canada Mortgage Trust is the organization created by CMHC that issues these bonds.
Options (1), (2), and (4) are incorrect because the CMHC did not create virtual banks, Ginnie Mae Mortgage-Backed Securities, or credit unions.
[Chapter 13]
As a marketing incentive to speed up the sale of newly completed but unsold condominiums, a developer agrees to provide the buyers with first mortgages written at 8% rather than the going market rate of 13%. if they pay the $45.000 asking price.
Under these circumstances, the developer would likely be equally satisfied (in cash equivalent terms) with an “all cash” offer:
- less than $45,000.
- more than $45,000.
- equal to $45,000.
- that includes an additional bonus in order to purchase the unity
Option (1) is correct. Since the market rate is higher than the contract rate, the market value of the mortgage is less than the face value of $45,000. The cash-equivalent value of the mortgage at 8% will be less than a $45,000 mortgage at 13%. Options (2), (3), and (4) are therefore incorrect. [Chapter 16]
Owners have to live in the property as a principal residence for ____ months in order to avoid the Empty Homes Tax;
6 months
Properties which are rented for at least ___ days in a row for a minimum of ___ months in aggregate over the course of a year are exempt from the EHT.
30 days in a row for 6 months
Where an agent with authority enters into a contract with a third party and does not disclose that they are acting as an agent:
- the third party may sue either the agent or the principal to enforce the contract.
- the principal may sue the agent to enforce the contract.
- only the agent may sue the thing patro enforce the contract
- there is no contract in existence because there is no disclosure
Option (1) is correct because, at common law, where an agent does not disclose to a third party that he or she is acting as an agent, the agent may be held liable as a principal. This rule is justified because the third party was led to believe that it was making a contract with the agent personally, and might not have chosen to enter a contract with the principal had they been aware of the principal’s existence and/or identity. Option (2) is incorrect because the contract is not between the agent and the principal, but is instead between the principal and the third party (though the agent may be held liable as a principal, as mentioned previously). Option (3) is incorrect because the contract remains between the principal and the third party, and therefore, the principal may sue the third party to enforce it. Option (4) is incorrect because an agent’s failure to disclose their status as an agent does not render a contract void. [Chapter 12]
An option to purchase the mortgaged property given by the mortgagor to the mortgagee at the time the mortgage is negotiated is:
- enforceable if the mortgagor has independent legal advice.
- void.
- entorceable in all cases.
- called the equity of redemption.
Option (2) is correct because there is a fundamental principle of mortgage law which prohibits “clogging” on “the equity of redemption”. The equity of redemption refers to a borrower’s right to repay the mortgage and, upon doing so, to redeem his or her legal title to the property free of all encumbrances. In other words, a borrower (or the mortgagor) cannot be prevented by the terms of the mortgage from eventually redeeming his or her property free from the conditions contained in the mortgage. An option to purchase a mortgaged property given by the mortgagor (the borrower) to the mortgagee (the lender) at the time the mortgage is negotiated, if exercised, would prevent the mortgagor from redeeming his or her property upon repayment, and is therefore void.
Option (1) is incorrect because the prohibition against clogging does not disappear even where the mortgagor has independent legal advice.
Option (3) is incorrect because a void option cannot be enforceable in any case. Option (4) is incorrect because the equity of redemption refers to a mortgagor’s right to repay the mortgage, and is not a term for an option to repurchase a mortgaged property. [Chapter 15]
Given that all other factors are identical, the longer the term of the contract on a bonused, partially amortized mortgage (where the bonus is paid by the borrower):
- the lower the effective interest rate paid by the borrower.
- the higher the effective interest rate paid by the borrower.
- the higher the required monthly payment
- the higher the outstanding balance at the terms end
Option (1) is correct because all things being equal, a longer term on a bonused partially amortized loan will result in a lower effective interest rate paid by the borrower. This is because the value of the bonus is paid off over a longer term, thus decreasing the annual cost of borrowing. Options (2), (3), and (4) are incorrect for this reason. [Chapter 16]
*Think about buying a couch at Leon’s, if you push your term to be longer…your interest will be lower but you will be stuck in a longer contract.
Two mortgages requiring constant blended payments are identical in all respects except that one has a five-year term and the other has a two-year term. The monthly payments on the five-year term mortgage would be:
- higher than those required on the two-year term mortgage.
- lower than those required on the two-year term mortgage.
- the same as those required on the two-year term mortgage.
- impossible to compare given the information presented.
reason. [Chapter 13]
Option (3) is correct because the difference in term has no impact on the monthly payments. Since the loan amount, interest rate, and amortization period are all the same, the monthly payments will be the same. Options (1),
(2), and (4) are incorrect for this reason
The practice of recognizing expenses as they are incurred, rather than when they are paid for, is a characteristic of which generally accepted accounting principle?
1. The cost principle
2. The recognition principle
3. The matching principle
4. The conservation principle
Option (3) is correct because the matching principle states that expenses must be recorded when they are incurred, not when they are paid. Option (1) is incorrect because the cost principle states that assets must be recorded for the purchase price on the date of acquisition. Option (2) is incorrect because the recognition principle is not an accounting principle, although the revenue recognition principle states that revenues must be recorded when they are earned, not when money is received. Option (4) is incorrect because the conservation principle is not a generally accepted accounting principle.
[chapter 8]
Which one of the following statements is FALSE?
- A deposit is held by the brokerage as a stakeholder until the real estate transaction is completed.
- Unless a deposit is paid when an offer to purchase is made, there is no binding contract for purchase and sale.
- If a deposit is made by uncertified cheque, the brokerage should issue a cheque on its trust account when the brokerage knows that the deposit cheque has been honoured.
- Once an offer has been accepted, the brokerage may return the deposit if all parties to the contract consent in writing to the release of the deposit.
Option (2) is correct (false) because a binding contract of purchase and sale can be created if there is an offer, acceptance, and consideration. The exchange of promises to convey title to the property in return for the purchase price is valid consideration, even without a deposit. Options (1), (3), and (4) are incorrect because they are true statements. [Chapter 11]
Which of the following statements concerning the equitable jurisdiction of the court is TRUE?
- Where the rules of equity and common law conflict the court will apply the common law rule.
- Equitable remedies are available to parties in a court action as of right, regardless of their conduct.
- “The rules of equity developed as a remedy for the rigidity of the common law in England.
- Specific performance, injunctions, and legal damages are three types of equitable remedies.
Option (3) is correct. Option (1) is incorrect because where the rules of equity and common law conflict, equitable principles take priority. Option (2) is incorrect because equitable remedies are awarded at the discretion of the court. Option (4) is incorrect because damages are a common law remedy. [Chapter 1]
Which one of the following is the generally accepted accounting principle that determines what amount will be recorded on the company’s balance sheet as the value of a building at the time of purchase?
- The objectivity principle
- The consistency principle
- The revenue recognition principle
- The cost principle
Option (4) is correct because the cost principle states that a company must record the value of an asset as the price paid at the time of acquisition. Option
(1) is incorrect because the objectivity principle states that all values must be objective and verifiable. Option (2) is incorrect because the consistency principle states that once a company adopts a certain accounting policy, they should continue to use that same policy. Option (3) is incorrect because the revenue recognition principle states that revenue must be recorded when it is earned, not when cash is received. [Chapter 8]
Jennifer Joseph has lived alone in an apartment since the death of her husband 10 years ago. She has just turned 60 years of age, retired from her job as a bus driver, and wants to begin gardening as a hobby to fill in her retirement years. She has found a small house that is selling at a price she can afford because it is the only residential property in an area of commercial development. The present owners, who are anxious to sell, have lived in the house for about 20 years and have developed a magnificent garden, which appeals very much to Mrs. Joseph; however, she is worried about having enough retirement income to meet the mortgage payments and the property tax payments if she uses all of her savings as a down payment. Which one of the following statements is TRUE?
- Mrs. Joseph should apply for a reverse annuity mortgage (RAM) because a RAM will require lower mortgage payments than a conventional mortgage.
- After Mrs. Joseph’s purchase, the property will continue to have an assessed value for real property tax purposes, which is based on its value as a residential property.
- Mrs. Joseph may make an application to defer payment of the net property tax under the regular program for as many years as she owns and resides in the house.
- If Mrs. Joseph becomes an owner-occupier, the home owner grants will allow reduction of her taxes to no more than $350.
Option (3) is correct because British Columbia’s regular tax deferral program will allow Mrs. Joseph to make an application to defer up to 100% of the net property taxes payable on the property, since it will be her principal place of residence. Assuming that Mrs. Joseph is either a Canadian citizen or a permanent resident, and that she would have a minimum equity of 25% in the property if she purchased it, she would likely qualify for the regular program given that she is both 55 and a widow.
Option (1) is incorrect because a reverse annuity mortgage is a type of mortgage that can function to supplement the income of aged persons who already own their home, not as a way to reduce mortgage payments where a new home is being purchased.
Option (2) is incorrect because the property is the only residential property in an area of commercial development. While section 19(8) of the Assessment Act permits certain residential properties to be assessed according to the value based solely on their current residential use, Mrs. Joseph would not qualify for this special assessment because she has not lived continuously in the residence for ten years.
Option (4) is incorrect because Mrs. Joseph would only qualify for the basic home owner grant, which cannot be used to reduce total property taxes below $350.00.
[Chapter 19]
DCR =
= NOI/PMT
- What is left over from your income / payment to ensure you can pay your mortgage. Ex. 1.0 is breaking evenly into the income. The higher the DCR the more you can afford to pay, and the more likely you are to get a loan.
Mem: DR. NOI/P 👨⚕️
- Commercial
PMT =
= NOI/DCR
Which of the following statements about the fee simple estate is TRUE?
- The term “fee” means that the rights exercisable by the holder of a fee simple estate have been acquired by a payment of money.
- Where the owner of a fee simple estate dies without a will, the property will “escheat” to the Crown.
- An owner of a fee simple estate has the right to sell, rent, or lease the estate.
- A fee simple estate is an estate that is held for a limited period of time.
Option (3) is correct because an owner of a fee simple estate has the greatest bundle of rights over his or her land that can be held in Canada, which includes the right to sell, rent, or lease the estate.
Option (1) is incorrect because the term “fee” means that the estate can be inherited.
Option (2) is incorrect because if the owner of a fee simple estate dies without a will, the owner’s heirs will inherit the estate in fee simple with the priority of the heirs being determined by the laws of intestate succession.
Option (4) is incorrect because a fee simple estate has rights to the land for so long as he or she has heirs. [Chapter 3]
Many anti-virus and malware protection programs include an auto-update feature that does which of the following?
- Instructs the program to download profiles of new viruses and malware from the manufacturer’s website
- Instructs the user to save their work because a virus threat or malware is imminent
- Instructs the user to purchase the newest version of “automatic update” so that they can install new profiles
- Instructs the program to erase all definitions of new viruses or malware so that your computer will be protected
Option (1) is correct because anti-virus and malware protection programs include an auto-update feature (automatic update) that instructs the program to download profiles (also called definitions) of new viruses and malware from the manufacturer’s website.
Options (2), (3), and (4) do not describe typical auto-update features. [Chapter 26]
Under the law of contract, which of the following is NOT an element of a misrepresentation by a seller that will entitle a buyer to rescind the contract of purchase and sale and claim damages?
- The statement must be one of opinion.
- The statement must have induced the buyer to enter the contract.
- The statement must have been one on which a reasonable person would have relied.
- The statement must have been made by the seller knowing it to be false, or recklessly as to its truth or falsehood.
Option (1) is correct because a misrepresentation is a false statement of fact, not of opinion.
Option (2) is incorrect because in order to be a misrepresentation that would entitle the buyer to rescind the contract, the statement must have induced the other party to enter into the contract.
Option (3) is incorrect because the statement must also be one which would have induced a reasonable person to enter into the contract.
Option (4) is incorrect because in order to claim damages, the seller must have known it was false, or have been reckless as to its truth or falsehood.
[Chapter 10]
An appraiser is using the market approach for an appraisal of a single-family house. By proper adjustment, the appraiser can use sale prices of all the following properties for comparison purposes, EXCEPT:
- houses in different neighbourhoods.
- houses with different square footage.
- houses recently sold between related parties.
Option (3) is correct because appraisers cannot use sale prices for houses recently sold between related parties for comparison purposes. Market value is determined by analyzing market transactions where the buyer and seller have no special relationship (i.e., the sale occurred at arm’s length) and the properties sold are similar (or comparable) to the subject property. Options
(1), (2), and (4) are incorrect because with appropriate adjustment, the sale prices of all of these properties can be used for comparison purposes. [Chapter 22]
Which of the following statements regarding strata properties is TRUE?
- Each strata lot is entitled to one vote, which is given a proportionate decision making value by the strata council in accordance with the unit entitlement of the particular lot.
- A strata corporation for a residential strata complex that passes a bylaw severely restricting the number of lots that may be leased may restrict any renewals of existing leases until the total number of leased lots in the complex complies with the bylaw.
- A bylaw that is passed by a strata corporation cannot be enforced against a strata lot owner unless or until it has been filed in the appropriate land title office.
- The owners of the strata lots that are on the top floor of a residential strata complex also own the airspace above their individual lots; however, the Strata Property Act restricts the use of the airspace to only those uses that are approved by a special resolution of the strata corporation.
Option (3) is correct because a strata corporation may amend the Standard Bylaws in the Strata Property Act by creating a new custom-made bylaw, but they may not enforce such a bylaw until it has been filed at the land title office.
Option (1) is incorrect because a vote’s decision making value is not determined by the lot’s unit entitlement – rather, one vote per lot is given regardless of the size of the lot.
Option (2) is incorrect because rental restriction bylaws do not apply to strata units for one full year following their passage or, if there is a tenant in a strata lot on the day the new bylaw is passed, the one-year grace period only begins on the day the tenant vacates the strata lot.
Option (4) is incorrect because the strata lot is restricted to its description in the strata plan, and everything outside of that parcel is considered to be common property. [Chapter 7]
Which of the following is FALSE with respect to strata lot ownership?
- The sole purpose of creating a strata corporation is to limit the liability of the corporation members.
- The concept of ownership of part of a building is an ancient one, now recognized by provincial legislation.
- A strata development is a special way of subdividing land and buildings into parts for separate ownership with common features.
- A strata corporation is only permitted to pass a bylaw restricting the rental of strata lots if it is limiting rental to tenants over the age of 55.
Option (1) is correct because strata corporations are created so that property can be subdivided into separate parts for private ownership. The sole purpose is not to limit the liability of the corporation members.
Options (2), (3), and (4) are incorrect because these are true statements relating to strata lot ownership.
[Chapter 7]
In British Columbia, a lender who holds a mortgage registered as a charge on an otherwise clear title to a borrower’s land has:
- the equitable right to redeem the mortgage.
- an interest in land created by contract.
- priority over every other subsequent creditor and lienholder in respect of the mortgaged land.
- the right to retain the mortgagor’s duplicate certificate of title to the mortgaged land until the loan is repaid in full.
Option (2) is correct because it describes a mortgage. A mortgage is not a loan itself; it is an interest in land that provides security for the loan.
Option (1) is incorrect because the first registered mortgage provides the lender with a legal (rather than an equitable) right of redemption. This is subject to the borrower’s equity of redemption, which allows the borrower to repay the mortgage after the contractual date for payment.
Option (3) is incorrect because a mortgage lender can lose its priority over certain charges even though the mortgage was registered first. Examples of these include builders liens, Strata Property Act judgments, property tax liens, wage claim certificates and workers compensation claims.
Option (4) is incorrect because retaining the mortgagor’s duplicate certificate of title to the land creates an equitable mortgage. The lender cannot register this equitable mortgage as a charge at the land title office. [Chapter 15]
The general property transfer tax rate is:
___% of the fair market value up to and including $200,000.
___% of the fair market value greater than $200,000 and up to and including $2,000,000.
___% of the fair market value greater than $2,000,000.
1% of the fair market value up to and including $200,000.
2% of the fair market value greater than $200,000 and up to and including $2,000,000.
3% of the fair market value greater than $2,000,000.
A board of variance is:
- a provincial board charged with the responsibility of seeing that actions by municipalities comply with the Local Government Act.
- a board established by municipalities with the power to amend property assessments.
- a board established by municipalities to determine whether a zoning bylaw creates undue hardships on property owners.
- a board established by municipalities to settle boundary line disputes between private parties.
Option (3) is correct because a board of variance is a local government board that determines whether a zoning bylaw creates undue hardships on property owners. It can grant a minor variance, provided it does not conflict with the local government’s policies.
Option (1) is incorrect because a board of variance is not a provincial board.
Option (2) is incorrect because a board of variance does not have the power to amend property assessments.
Option (4) is incorrect because while a board of variance may grant minor variances to zoning bylaws, it does not settle property line disputes between private parties.
[Chapter 18]
Julie is acting as the listing licensee for a property owned by her client, George. Julie also represents a client, Ahmed, whom she is helping find a suitable property to buy. Ahmed becomes interested in purchasing George’s property. Julie would like to continue to represent George as a client in the sale of his property, while releasing Ahmed as a client. To do this, Julie must enter into an Agreement Regarding Conflict of Interest Between Clients with:
- George, the continuing client, only
- Ahmed, the released client, only
- Both George and Ahmed
- Neither George nor Ahmed, as the Agreement Regarding Conflict of Interest Between Clients must only be agreed to by Julie’s managing broker
Option (3) is correct because when a licensee is faced with a conflict of interest between multiple clients, the licensee must enter into an Agreement Regarding Conflict of Interest Between Clients with all clients.
Options (1), (2), and (4) are incorrect for this reason. [Chapter 12]
In which of the following situations will the agency authority continue to exist?
- Lorne lists his house for sale with Steve. The house burns down.
- Lorne enters into an exclusive listing agreement with his agent Mark. Lorne then sells the property himself without Mark’s assistance.
- Lorne tells his agent over the phone that he no longer has the authority to sell his house.
- None of the above.
Option (4) is correct because each of the scenarios laid out in Options (1), (2), and (3) would terminate the agency authority.
Option (1) is incorrect because the doctrine of frustration appears to apply to the agency relationship, meaning that if a house listed for sale burns down, the agency would probably be terminated.
Option (2) is incorrect because, the moment the principal sells his or her property, he or she terminates the authority of all listing brokers, no matter what kind of listing agreement they have. The principal may, however, still be liable to pay commission.
Option (3) is incorrect because either party to an agency agreement can terminate the authority (orally or by conduct) at will. [Chapter 12]
Which of the following topics would NOT be found on an official community plan?
- Restrictions on the use of land that is subject to hazardous conditions.
- The location and phasing of major highways, sewers, and water lines.
- The location, amount, type, and density of residential development required to meet anticipated housing needs over the next year.
- The location and type of present and proposed public facilities.
Option (3) is correct because an official community plan contains information on residential development required to meet housing needs for at least the next five years. Options (1), (2), and (4) would all be found on an official community plan. [Chapter 18]
Joan was considering putting in an offer on a farm in Peachland, British Columbia for $130,000, subject to arranging suitable financing. She approached Peachy Credit Union for pre-approval of a mortgage loan, and Peachy hired A & A Appraisers to determine the value of the farm for mortgage purposes. A & A appraised the property at $135,000 and Peachy Credit Union approved a mortgage loan of $101,250 to Joan, who then went ahead with the purchase. Eleven months later the bank was forced to foreclose on the property and upon obtaining another appraisal, found that the market value of the property was only $70,000. It is found that A & A was negligent in its appraisal report.
What remedies, if any, are available to Joan and Peachy Credit Union?
- Peachy Credit Union can sue A & A for breach of contract, but Joan has no case against A & A.
- Peachy Credit Union can sue Joan for their loss under her personal covenant but cannot sue A & A Appraisers.
- Peachy Credit Union can sue A & A for breach of contract and Joan can sue A & A under tort law.
- No remedies are available to either Joan or Peachy Credit Union.
Option (3) is the correct answer. A & A Appraisers will be responsible to Peach Credit Union under contract law, and will be responsible to Joan under tort law. The appraisal contract is between A & A and Peachy Credit Union, and an implied term in the contract is the appraisal report be carefully prepared according to accepted appraisal practices. Due to the unacceptable error, it is clear that this contract has been breached by A & A. There is no contract between A & A and Joan, but it is reasonable that Joan may rely on this appraisal report. Given the unacceptable error, A & A may be liable to Joan for the tort of negligence.
Options (1), (2), and (4) are therefore incorrect. [Chapter 21]
Question 80
Which of the following BEST describes the MLS®?
- A site that allows the user to create written documents in MLS® format
- A site that is used to register domain names for real estate offices
- A software program that allows you to conduct an appraisal
- A site that pulls together information on real estate related topics with a focus on real estate listings
Option (4) is correct because the MLS® serves many functions, including computing listing searches, producing automated hot sheets, and generating Comparative Market Analysis (CMA) presentations and other client prospecting tools. Options (1), (2), and (3) are incorrect because none of these statements correctly describes a primary function of the MLS®. [Chapter 26]
Which of the following is a FALSE statement regarding the duties licensees owe to their clients under the Real Estate Services Rules?
- The duty to act in the client’s best interests does not include taking actions that are unlawful.
- The duty to act within the scope of authority given by the client does not include signing agreements for the client unless written permission is received.
- The duty of confidentiality is terminated when the relationship between the licensee and the client ends.
- The duty of full disclosure can include disclosing information a licensee may see as trivial.
Option (3) is correct because it is false. The duty of confidentiality to a client lasts forever.
Option (1) is incorrect because actions that are unlawful would be against the duty of acting in the client’s best interest.
Option (2) is incorrect because section 45 of the Real Estate Services Rules requires licensees to obtain written authorization to sign agreements on behalf of their clients.
Option (4) is incorrect because full disclosure requires licensees disclose to their clients all known material information, no matter how trivial. [Chapter 9]
Which of the following statements about the law in British Columbia governing occupier’s liability is FALSE?
- Under the statute, there can be more than one occupier of land at the same time.
- An occupier’s liability does not extend to risks willingly assumed by a visitor at their own risks.
- The language of the Occupiers Liability Act expressly preserves the common law distinction between the different types of visitors.
- The language of the Occupiers Liability Act would probably allow for the imposition of a lesser standard of care to be owed to a trespasser than to a person with permission to be on the premises.
Option (3) is correct because the Occupiers Liability Act (OLA) has removed the common law distinction between different types of visitors.
Option (1) is incorrect because section 1 of the OLA specifies that there may be more than one occupier of the same premises.
Option (2) is incorrect because section 3 of the OLA states that an occupier has no duty of care in respect of risks willingly assumed by a visitor, other than a duty not to create a danger with intent to do harm to the person or damage to the person’s property, or to act with reckless disregard to the safety of the person or the integrity of the person’s property.
Option (4) is incorrect because the legislation specifies that the duty of care imposed on an occupier is to take such care as is reasonable in the circumstances, so it is likely that the standard owed in the circumstances of someone trespassing on the property would be lower than that owed to an invited guest. [Chapter 5]
Which one of the following statements is FALSE?
- In an entirely residential condominium complex, a bylaw must be amended by a ¾ vote of the strata corporation.
- If a rule conflicts with a bylaw, the bylaw prevails.
- Strata corporations are prohibited from enacting rental restriction bylaws.
- Assuming the standard bylaws have not been amended, the strata council may pass rules with respect to the safety and cleanliness of individually owned strata lots.
Option (4) is correct (false) because the standard bylaws do not allow the strata council to pass rules with respect to the safety and cleanliness of individually owned strata lots – they can only do so with respect to the common property.
Options (1), (2), and (3) are all incorrect because they are true statements. [Chapter 7]
When an Order Absolute of Foreclosure is obtained by a petitioner who is in the position of second mortgagee, which of the following is FALSE?
- The second mortgagee can no longer exercise its right to sue the borrower on their personal covenant.
- The order forecloses the registered owner’s interest in the mortgaged land and permits the petitioner to transfer title into their own name.
- All other charges, liens, encumbrances, and interests registered on the borrower’s title are foreclosed or “wiped” off the title.
- The petitioner may sell the property after taking title to it and does not have to account to the borrower for any profit that might be realized in excess of the mortgage debt.
Option (3) is correct because an order absolute of foreclosure does not wipe all other charges, liens, encumbrances, and interests off the title.
Option (1) is incorrect because once the petitioner has been granted the order absolute of foreclosure, he or she may not then sue the borrower on the borrower’s personal covenant.
Option (2) is incorrect because the order absolute of foreclosure declares that the respondents are foreclosed of any right, title, or interest in the mortgaged property and it directs them to deliver up possession of the property to the petitioner.
Option (4) is incorrect because if the petitioner sells the land, there is no requirement to account to the borrower for any money received or any profit which might be realized in excess of the mortgaged debt.
[Chapter 15]
On June 1, Jem offered to buy Boo’s summer cottage for $230,000, and Boo accepted. Since the cottage was on a secluded island, neither party was aware that on May 30, the cottage was struck by lightning and completely destroyed by fire. Boo has no insurance and is seeking to enforce the contract.
Which of the following statements is TRUE?
- This is an example of mutual mistake and Jem can rescind the contract.
- The doctrine of frustration applies here and both parties are relieved of their future obligations under the contract.
- A court will set aside the contract based on “non est factum” (it is not my deed) or unilateral mistake since Jem did not know the nature of the document he was signing and could not have known the cottage was no longer standing.
- This is an example of common mistake and the contract is void.
Option (4) is correct because a common mistake occurs when both parties to a contract make the same mistake about a fundamental term of the contract, such as the existence of what is being sold. In this case, the fact that the cottage had been destroyed prior to the formation of the contract was unknown to both parties. The existence of a common mistake such as this renders a contract void.
Option (1) is incorrect because a mutual mistake occurs when both parties make a fundamental mistake about the contract but each makes a different mistake. Here, the mistake was the same (the assumption that the cottage still existed).
Option (2) is incorrect because frustration occurs where a specific thing that is necessary for the performance of the contract is no longer in existence at the time for performance. In this case, the cottage was destroyed before the contract was entered into, meaning that frustration does not apply.
Option (3) is incorrect because (a) there is no indication that Jem did not understand the nature of the contract of sale; and (b) the mistake regarding the existence of the cottage was a common mistake, not a unilateral mistake since both Jem and Boo were mistaken. [Chapter 10]
Which of the following statements concerning mortgages is FALSE?
- A mortgage is a loan.
- A mortgage is an interest in land created by contract.
- The relationship of the parties to a mortgage is that of debtor and creditor.
- In British Columbia, mortgages are registered on title as a charge.
Option (1) is incorrect because a mortgage is not a loan, but instead is security for a loan.
Options (2), (3), and (4) are incorrect because these are all true statements concerning mortgages. [Chapter 15]
Which of the following options defines the term “amperage”?
- A measure of electrical potential
- A measure of electrical consumption
- A measure of electrical flow
- A measure of electrical power
Option (3) is correct because amperage is defined as a measure of electrical flow.
Option (1) is incorrect because voltage is defined as a measure of electrical potential.
Options (2) and (4) are incorrect because wattage is defined as a measure of electrical consumption or power. [Chapter 20]
- Aunt Amperage taught me about my FLOW
Which one of the following is NOT an activity of a Board of Variance?
- To permit a structural alteration to a building used for a non-conforming use
- To hear an appeal where the enforcement of a zoning bylaw will cause undue hardship
- To amend a zoning bylaw
- To establish a time limit within which construction of a minor variance must be completed
Option (3) is correct because a Board of Variance does not have the jurisdiction to amend zoning bylaws. Instead, the function of a Board of Variance is to permit minor exceptions, or “variances”, to existing bylaws, without altering the bylaws themselves. Amending zoning bylaws is the responsibility of municipal councils and regional districts.
Options (1), (2), and (4) are incorrect because a Board of Variance is given the authority to hear appeals in situations where the enforcement of a bylaw would cause undue hardship. To achieve this purpose, the Board may permit a structural alteration to a building used for a non-conforming use, and may establish time limits within which construction of a variance must be completed. [Chapter 18]
Which one of the following statements correctly describes the manner in which taxes are adjusted?
- If the seller has already paid the current year’s taxes, the seller must be given a credit of the taxes from the adjustment date to December 31.
- If the taxes are overdue and a penalty is owing, both the amount of the taxes and the penalty must be apportioned between the buyer and the seller.
- If the taxes are not yet due, no adjustment is made until the tax bill arrives.
- All of the above are correct.
Option (1) is correct because the seller has already paid all of the taxes for the current year and needs to be refunded the amount proportional to the time that the seller is no longer living in the property.
Option (2) is incorrect because the seller is responsible for the full amount of any penalty. It is not adjusted because only the seller is liable to pay the taxes and failed to do so in a timely manner.
Option (3) is incorrect because the seller must pay the buyer, in advance of the tax payment, for the portion of the year prior to the adjustment date. [Chapter 24]
For which one of the following properties would an appraiser be MOST justified in employing the cost approach to determine market value?
- A 40-year-old bungalow that represents the highest and best use
- A newly-constructed church of contemporary design
- A vacant lot that possesses latent value
- A high rise office tower located in an outer suburb
Option (2) is correct. An appraiser who is asked to find the market value of a newly-constructed church would not be able to use the comparative or investment approaches due to the lack of data and would be justified in relying upon the cost approach. In addition, the appraiser can effectively determine the cost of constructing the improvements since the church is newly constructed and has not experienced any depreciation.
Option (1) is incorrect because a 40-year old bungalow should be appraised using the direct comparison approach.
Option (3) is incorrect because a vacant lot with latent value should be appraised using the residual method.
Option (4) is incorrect because a high rise office tower in an outer suburb should be appraised using the income approach. [Chapter 21]
If there is no listing contract in existence but the agent effects a sale of the principal’s property at the request of the principal, the courts will:
- not imply an undertaking to pay the agent remuneration.
- imply a promise to pay the agent remuneration.
- allow the agent to collect only their out of pocket expenses.
- hold the agent liable for any default of the buyer.
Option (2) is correct because in the case where there is no listing contract but the agent effects a sale of the seller’s property at the request of the seller, the courts can apply the principle of quantum meruit to imply a promise to pay a reasonable amount for the professional services provided. Option (1) is incorrect for the same reason.
Option (3) is incorrect because the courts will give a reasonable remuneration based on what the service provided was worth, not just out of pocket expenses.
Option (4) is incorrect because, even if there was a listing contract between the agent and the principal in this case, the agent is working on behalf of the seller and so they would not be held liable for the buyer’s default. [Chapter 12]
Jacob hires Choo Choo Contracting (“Choo Choo”), a general contractor, to renovate his living room to better display his model train collection. Choo Choo subcontracts Jennifer, an electrician, to install the specialized electrical connections. After Jennifer completes the work, but before she has been paid, Choo Choo suddenly goes out of business. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
- Jennifer can file a builders lien against Jacob’s property by submitting a Claim of Lien to the Land Title Office within the lien filing period.
- If Jacob sells his property before Jennifer files a builders lien, then any lien she files will affect Jacob, but will not affect the interests of the purchaser.
- Jennifer cannot file a builders lien because subcontractors who were not hired directly by the owner of a property cannot file builders liens, and can only pursue the general contractor directly.
- If Jennifer files a builders lien against Jacob’s property, she must begin a lawsuit and file a Certificate of Pending Litigation against title to the property within 21 months from the date she registered the lien in order to enforce it.
Option (1) is correct because a builders lien must be filed at the Land Title Office within the lien filing period, which is 45 days after certain “trigger dates” specified in the Builders Lien Act (the “BLA”).
Option (2) is incorrect because liens may still be filed after ownership of a property is transferred, as long as the lien filing deadline has not passed. The buyer may potentially be liable for any builders liens that are filed even after the completion of their purchase.
Option (3) is incorrect because subcontractors engaged by a general contractor may file builders liens.
Option (4) is incorrect because the BLA requires lien claimants to begin a lawsuit and file a CPL within one year, unless the owner serves a Form 6, in which case the lien claimant must begin a lawsuit and file a CPL within 21 days. [Chapter 4]
Steve-Ann, a trading services licensee, has been asked by her friend Jean to find a house and, if successful, Jean has agreed to pay Steve-Ann the sum of $3,000, over and above any commission that Steve-Ann would earn on the sale of the property. When Steve-Ann finds a house acceptable to Jean, Steve-Ann shares the commission with the other licensees involved and receives $3,000 directly from Jean. Steve-Ann does not tell anyone of this $3,000 payment.
Which of the following statements are TRUE?
- Steve-Ann has breached the provisions of the Real Estate Services Act.
- Steve-Ann has breached the common law principles of agency law.
- Both (1) and (2) are true.
- Neither (1) nor (2) is true
Option (1) is correct because section 56 of the Real Estate Services Rules requires a licensee to disclose to his or her brokerage the full amount of commission received or anticipated as a result of providing real estate services.
Option (2) is incorrect because at common law, an agent is any person who contracts to act for or on behalf of another. Therefore, failing to tell anyone of this $3,000 payment does not breach the common law principles of agency law.
Option (3) is incorrect because Option (2) is false.
Option (4) is incorrect because Option (1) is true. [Chapter 12]
A seller refuses to sign a subject removal form to strike out a condition precedent from a contract of purchase and sale. Assuming that the condition was made exclusively for the benefit of the buyer, the agreement is:
- binding.
- unenforceable.
- voidable at the option of the seller.
- void
Option (1) is correct because where a condition is for the sole benefit of the buyer, the buyer may waive it and thus the agreement would be binding. Because a binding agreement can be enforced and is not void,
Options (2) and (4) are incorrect.
Option (3) is incorrect because the condition was made for the benefit of the buyer, so it would only be voidable at the option of the buyer, not the seller. [Chapter 11]
A pre-approved mortgage for a residential property:
- will always guarantee the borrower’s interest rate for 365 days.
- calculates the minimum loan that the borrower qualifies for.
- is based on the borrower’s current financial situation and a satisfactory credit review.
- is based on a formula provided by the Fair Isaac Corporation.
Option (3) is correct because mortgage lenders may pre-approve a potential borrower for a mortgage based on their current financial situation and a satisfactory credit review.
Options (1), (2) and (4) are incorrect. [Chapter 17]
Which one of the following is the BEST method of accounting for cyclical repairs in the appraisal of an income-producing property?
- Increase the capitalization rate
- Deduct the amount of the repair in the year it is expected to be incurred
- Apportion the amount of the repair to an annual allowance
- Reduce the eventual sale price of the property to reflect depreciation
Option (3) is correct because when using the income approach, an appropriate annual allowance or reserve should be made to cover the total cost of periodic repairs. For example, to cover the cost of painting every three years, one-third of the total painting cost could be allocated as an expense each year.
Options (1), (2), and (4) are therefore incorrect. [Chapter 23]
The market value of a vacant site can be determined using:
- the cost approach of appraisal.
- the comparative approach of appraisal.
- the accrual approach of appraisal.
- the capitalization approach of appraisal.
Option (2) is correct because a vacant site can only be valued using the comparative approach of appraisal.
Options (1), (3), and (4) are therefore incorrect. [Chapter 21]
Elly, a licensed real estate representative, entered into a written exclusive listing contract with Laura to list Laura’s house for sale for $300,800. Shortly after entering into this agreement, Elly’s licence expired. Unaware of the expiration of her licence, Elly proceeded to hold three open houses and several other showings of the house, eventually finding a buyer who offered $300,800 for the house. Laura accepted the offer, but when she learned about Elly’s licence expiry, she refused to pay any commission to Elly. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
- A court will not award Elly any form of remuneration in this situation.
- The Real Estate Services Act permits Elly to sue Laura for commission in this situation whether or not the listing contract specified the amount Elly was to receive.
- A lawsuit to recover damages against Laura for breach of the listing contract will probably succeed even if Laura later refuses to complete the sale of her house.
- Based on the limited facts in this situation, the listing contract likely violates the statutory requirements of the Real Estate Services Act.
Option (1) is correct because section 4 of the Real Estate Services Act stipulates that if an agent is unlicensed at the time real estate services were provided, he or she cannot bring a court action to collect commission.
Options (2) and (3) are incorrect for the same reason. Option (4) is incorrect because there is no indication, based on the facts presented in this situation, that the listing contract violates the statutory requirements of the Real Estate Services Act. [Chapter 12]
From the point of view of the lender, the interest charged on a mortgage does NOT represent:
- a payment for a portion of the general overhead and operating costs of the lender.
- the cost of financing the lender’s debt.
- an incentive to accept uncertainty or risk.
- a return on capital invested.
Option (2) is the correct answer as it is the only option that is not represented by interest received by a lender. Interest due or paid represents the cost of financing debt, not interest received.
Options (1), (3), and (4) all represent interest charged on a mortgage and are therefore incorrect. [Chapter 13]
A property owner is making an application to the municipal council to amend a zoning bylaw. Which of the following steps is NOT a part of the rezoning process?
- The municipal council must vote in favour of the amendment on four different occasions (readings).
- According to the Local Government Act, the municipal council must wait at least six months before approving the amendment.
- The applicant may be required to donate a portion of their land to the municipality to be used as a park or pay to widen an existing road.
- The applicant may be required to give a presentation about the amendment and answer questions from the municipal council at a public hearing.
Option (2) is correct because the municipal council is not required to wait at least six months before approving an amendment to a zoning bylaw.
Option (1) is incorrect because any rezoning bylaw must be given four readings by the municipal council, meaning that the council must vote in favour of the bylaw four separate times.
Option (3) is incorrect because subdivision bylaws, made under the Local Government Act, may require that an owner dedicate up to five percent of their land for park purposes. In addition, sometimes an applicant will be required to pay for the widening of roads.
Option (4) is incorrect because after a proposed rezoning bylaw receives a favourable first (or sometimes second) reading, a public hearing is usually held. At the hearing, the applicant may be required to give a short presentation, and will be asked questions about the proposal by the municipal council. [Chapter 18]
Which of the following statements about the principles that apply to all strata developments in British Columbia is TRUE?
- The Strata Property Act generally does not apply on First Nation reserve land, subject to some exceptions.
- The strata division of the Civil Resolution Tribunal conducts random audits to verify the compliance of strata corporations with strata legislation.
- Residential strata developments that consist of 3 or fewer units are not required to hold annual general meetings.
- Commercial and industrial strata developments are subject to a separate and enhanced subset of compliance requirements under the Strata Property Act.
Option (1) is correct because First Nation reserve land constitutes an exclusively federal undertaking under the Constitution Act, 1867, and therefore, provincial legislation such as the Strata Property Act (“SPA”) generally does not apply on such lands, subject to the leasehold landlord provisions in the SPA.
Option (2) is incorrect because while the owners may apply to the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) to make binding decisions when a dispute arises, the CRT’s role does not involve proactive efforts such as random audits to ensure compliance.
Option (3) is incorrect because all strata corporations are required to hold annual general meetings to comply with the SPA, regardless of their size. There are, however, options for strata corporations to waive the requirement to hold an annual general meeting.
Option (4) is incorrect because the same fundamental legal principles apply to all strata developments, and commercial and industrial strata developments are not subject to enhanced compliance requirements under the SPA. [Chapter 4]
Which appraisal approach/method would be MOST suitable to appraise a new pulp mill in Squamish?
- Market comparison
- Residual
- Income
- Cost
Option (4) is correct because a pulp mill in Squamish is likely very unique without any comparable properties, so the cost approach must be used.
Options (1), (2), and (3) are incorrect because these are likely inappropriate methods to appraise such a property, given its unique character. [Chapter 21]
Helen is the owner and occupier of a detached 2-bedroom house in Vancouver. Which of the following statements regarding property taxes on Helen’s property is FALSE?
- The Assessment Act is the sole source of statute law governing taxation of real property in British Columbia.
- If Helen moves to Toronto but keeps her home in Vancouver for her mother to live in, Helen may have higher annual net property tax liability.
- The municipality can appeal the assessment on Helen’s home if they believe the original assessed value is too low.
- Helen has lived in her home for the last 11 years and in that time her neighbourhood has been rezoned to multi-family strata buildings. Each strata lot has a higher assessment value than Helen’s current detached home. Helen may apply for a special assessment for her home to be assessed based on its current residential use.
Option (1) is correct (false) because there is no single statute law governing the real property tax system in BC. The Assessment Act is one of the sources of property law, but not the only source.
Option (2) is incorrect (true) since Helen, as the registered owner, is no longer living in the Vancouver property, she is not eligible for the basic home owner grant.
Option (3) is incorrect (true); if a property has been incorrectly assessed, anyone, including a municipal council, can file an appeal to the Property Assessment Review Panels under the Assessment Act.
Option (4) is incorrect (true); Helen is qualified for a special assessment on her property because she has lived continuously in that home for more than 10 years, and the property was zoned for a higher use. [Chapter 19]
In a single-storey house, joists are horizontal framing members that support which of the following?
- Rafters
- The foundation only
- Floors
- The foundation and ceilings
Option (3) is correct because joists are the horizontal framing members that support the floors.
Option (1) is incorrect because joists do not support rafters.
Options (2) and (4) are incorrect as the foundation is the poured concrete footprint that supports the superstructure above. [Chapter 20]
What is an assessment notice?
- A demand for payment of a specified amount of property taxes
- A notice issued by the municipality stating the date on which the assessor will appraise your property
- A notice that informs the property owner of the actual value of their property
- A notice of the cost to the property owner of a local improvement project
Option (3) is correct because an assessment notice is a notice informing a property owner of the value of the property as of July 1 of the previous year.
Option (1) is incorrect because a separate statement called a “tax notice” is sent to property owners requesting payment of taxes.
Option (2) is incorrect because notice is not issued prior to an appraisal.
Option (4) is incorrect because an assessment notice does not deal with costs of local improvement projects to property owners. [Chapter 19]
Tina had a listing on a house that she wanted to sell to Tom. Tom didn’t want to make an offer on Tina’s listing because his own house had not sold. Tina offered to buy Tom’s present house if it did not sell in time to close on her listing. Tina signed a statement containing the details of her promise and gave it to Tom. Tom then signed an offer on Tina’s listing, which was accepted. Tom, now suffering from buyer’s remorse, is unhappy with the arrangement, and has reported Tina to the British Columbia Financial Services Authority (BCFSA) Which of the following statements is/are TRUE?
- Tina did nothing wrong in making this promise because she provided all the terms of the promise in writing, to Tom, prior to his entering the contract of purchase and sale.
- Tina is in breach of the Real Estate Services Act, because it prohibits licensees from promising to purchase property in order to induce a buyer to enter a contract.
- Tina is liable to be disciplined by BCFSA since her behaviour qualifies as misconduct as a licensee.
- Both (2) and (3) are true.
Option (1) is correct because although section 49 of the Real Estate Services Rules places limitations on when licensees can make promises to purchase property to induce a buyer to enter a contract, Tina complied with these limitations because she provided all the terms of the promise in writing to Tom before he entered into the contract of purchase and sale.
Option (2) is incorrect because Tina did not breach the Real Estate Services Act.
Option (3) is incorrect because Tina did not engage in misconduct and is not liable to be disciplined by the British Columbia Financial Services Authority.
Option (4) is incorrect because neither Options (2) nor (3) are correct. [Chapter 5]
Where a principal adopts a contract that their agent entered into without any authority:
- the third party is not obligated to honour the contract if they do not wish to.
- the principal can sue the agent for breach of warranty of authority.
- the agent is given authority retroactively to enter into that contract.
- the agent becomes a party to that contract.
Option (3) is correct because a principal can retroactively ratify a contract which was entered into by his agent without the necessary authority. Ratification expresses the principal’s consent to be bound just as if the agent had been authorized to make the contract in the first place.
Option (1) is incorrect because, if the principal ratifies the contract, the contract is valid and the third party is obligated to honour the contract.
Option (2) is incorrect because a warranty of authority is an agent’s promise to third parties (not the principal) that his or her actions fall within the scope of authority given by the principal. Therefore, only third parties to whom the warranty of authority is made can sue the agent for breaching the warranty.
Option (4) is incorrect because, where a principal adopts a contract which his agent entered into without any authority, the principal (not the agent) becomes a party to that contract. [Chapter 12]
Which of the following is NOT one of the obligations imposed on a strata corporation under the Strata Property Act?
- The obligation to keep the common property in a state of good and serviceable repair
- The obligation to maintain liability insurance of no less than $5,000,000 on the strata project
- The obligation to establish a contingency reserve fund for unusual or extraordinary expenses
- The obligation to establish a fund for payment of administrative expenses of the strata corporation
Option (2) is correct because the Strata Property Act does not require a minimum of $5,000,000 liability insurance on the strata project.
Option (1) is incorrect because the Strata Property Act imposes an obligation on the strata corporation to repair and maintain the common property and common assets.
Option (3) is incorrect because the Strata Property Act requires a contingency reserve fund to be established for unusual or extraordinary expenses.
Option (4) is incorrect because the Strata Property Act requires the strata corporation to maintain an operating fund for common expenses. [Chapter 7]
Which of the following items would appear on the buyer’s statement of adjustments as debits?
- Purchase price, conveyancing fees, and balance due to complete
- Deposit paid, buyer’s share of taxes paid, and cash proceeds of sale
- Assumption of first mortgage, deposit paid, and balance due to complete
- Buyer’s share of taxes paid, purchase price, and conveyancing fees
Option (4) is correct because these are all amounts owed by the buyer.
Option (1) is incorrect because the balance due to complete is a credit on the buyer’s statement of adjustments.
Option (2) is incorrect because the deposit paid and the balance due to complete are credits on the buyer’s statement of adjustments.
Option (3) is incorrect because these are all credits on the buyer’s statement of adjustments. [Chapter 24]
Misleading advertising is a criminal offence, prohibited by section 52 of the Competition Act. Which of the following statements concerning this offence is FALSE?
- A person or company can be found guilty under section 52 when the general impression conveyed by an advertisement is misleading, even though every part of their advertisement is true in a literal sense.
- To constitute an offence under this section, the representation must be false or misleading in a material respect.
- The standard applicable in determining whether a statement is misleading or not is whether a consumer was actually mislead or deceived.
- Someone accused under section 52 can avoid conviction if they show that they honestly believed that the representation was not false or misleading and that they exercised due diligence in making sure that was the case.
Option (3) is correct because the courts will consider whether the representation would have a real effect upon an ordinary consumer’s buying decision. There is no need to prove that an individual consumer or group of consumers was actually misled.
Option (1) is incorrect because the general impression test is considered where the oral or written statements in the representation are literally true but the visual portion may create a false impression.
Option (2) is incorrect because the representation must be false or misleading in a material respect to constitute an offence under section 52.
Option (4) is incorrect because the accused may escape liability under section 52 if they honestly believed that the representations or advertisements were not false or misleading and that they exercised due diligence in making sure that was the case. [Chapter 11]
Velma has just accepted Patricia’s written offer to purchase Velma’s home, which contains the following clause: “This offer is subject to the buyer selling her home at (address) by December 31”. Which one of the following statements is TRUE?
- If Patricia cannot sell her home by December 31, there is no contract and Velma retains the deposit.
- Patricia must complete even if she cannot sell her home.
- Patricia may waive this requirement at any time before completion.
- This requirement may be waived by Patricia on or before December 31.
Option (4) is correct because the party benefiting from the subject clause (in this case, Patricia) may remove the clause by declaring it fulfilled by written notice or by waiving it on or before the specified date for the condition.
Option (1) is incorrect because in a standard form contract of purchase and sale, unless each condition is waived or declared fulfilled, the contract will be terminated and the deposit would be returned (i.e., Velma would not retain the deposit).
Option (2) is incorrect because the contract will be cancelled if Patricia does not fulfill the subject clause by selling her home and she does not waive it, so Patricia will not be forced to complete.
Option (3) is incorrect because Patricia must waive the requirement on or before the date specified in the clause (December 31) rather than any time before completion. [Chapter 11]
In addition to carrying out the functions of a trading services representative, a validly licensed representative is entitled to:
- carry out trading services for an unlicensed real estate brokerage.
- be the managing broker of their own proprietorship.
- carry out trading services for close personal friends and business associates although not employed by a brokerage.
- Do none of the above.
Option (4) is correct because, under the Real Estate Services Act, a licensed representative is not entitled to carry out trading services for an unlicensed brokerage, to be the managing broker of their own proprietorship, or to carry out trading services without being employed by a brokerage. [Chapter 2]
An owner would have to live in the property as a principal residence for ____ months in order to avoid the Empty Homes Tax
An owner would have to live in the property as a principal residence for 6 months in order to avoid the Empty Homes Tax
Properties which are rented for at least ___ days in a row for a minimum of ____ months in aggregate over the course of a year are exempt from the EHT.
An owner would have to live in the property as a principal residence for 6 months in order to avoid the Empty Homes Tax
A seller refuses to acknowledge the waiver of a condition precedent from a contract of purchase and sale. Assuming that the condition was made exclusively for the benefit of the buyer and the waiver was made prior to the expiry of the condition precedent, the agreement is:
- one that is not binding on either party.
- voidable at the option of the seller.
- binding.
- voidable at the option of the buyer.
Option (3) is correct because section 54 of the Law and Equity Act provides that where a condition precedent is for the sole benefit of the buyer, the buyer is allowed to unilaterally waive the condition prior to its expiration. Section 54 overrides the common law rule preventing the unilateral waiver of a true condition precedent.
Option (1) is incorrect because the agreement remains valid and enforceable in this situation.
Options (2) and (4) are incorrect because, in this situation, the agreement does not become voidable at either the option of the seller or the buyer.
[Chapter 11]
Which appraisal approach/method would be MOST suitable to appraise a new pulp mill in Squamish?
- Market comparison
- Residual
- Income
- Cost
Option (4) is correct because a pulp mill in Squamish is likely very unique without any comparable properties, so the cost approach must be used.
Options (1), (2), and (3) are incorrect because these are likely inappropriate methods to appraise such a property, given its unique character. [Chapter 21]
The transfer by the borrower of the equity of redemption to a subsequent buyer does not always relieve the borrower of the covenant to repay the debt. However, there are circumstances where the borrower may be relieved of liability on the personal covenant. Which one of the following events would NOT relieve the borrower from this liability?
- The borrower has received a release from the lender.
- The borrower has sold the property with the knowledge of the lender.
- The Property Law Act releases the borrower.
- The original contract between the lender and the vendor is replaced by a new contract between a lender and the purchaser.
Option (2) is correct because the lender’s knowledge that the property has been sold will not relieve the borrower from liability on his or her personal covenant.
Options (1), (3), and (4) are incorrect because these events will relieve the borrower from this liability. [Chapter 15]
Vanna has agreed to sell her cottage to Pat. Vanna and Pat used a standard contract of purchase and sale, in which they agreed to the following dates:
Completion Date: August 31, 2018
Adjustment Date: January 1, 2019
Based on this information, which of the following statements is TRUE?
- There will be no adjustment for property taxes on the buyer’s statement of adjustments.
- The property taxes will appear as a credit on the buyer’s statement of adjustments.
- The property taxes will appear as a credit on the seller’s statement of adjustments.
- The property taxes will appear as a debit on the seller’s statement of adjustments.
Option (1) is correct because the buyer in a real estate transaction assumes responsibility for the taxes from the adjustment date onwards. Since Pat is assuming responsibility for the taxes on January 1, the first day of the year, no adjustment is necessary. Remember that property taxes are paid for a calendar year, even though they are usually due on July 1.
Options (2), (3), and (4) are incorrect, because no adjustment is necessary for property taxes in this scenario, and therefore property taxes will not appear as a debit or credit on either the buyer’s or seller’s statement of adjustments. [Chapter 24]
A owes B $1,000. B assigns the debt to C. For this to be a statutory assignment, three requirements are necessary. Which one of the following is NOT one of them?
- The assignment from B to C must be for the entire amount.
- The assignment from B to C must be in writing.
- The notification from C to A must be in writing.
- The notification from A to B must be in writing.
Option (4) is correct and Options (1), (2), and (3) are incorrect because the three requirements for a statutory assignment are that it is in writing, it is absolute and unconditional, and notice of the assignment is given to the original promisor. [Chapter 10]
“A contract respecting land or a disposition of land is not enforceable unless there is, in writing signed by the party to be charged or by his agent, both an indication that it has been made and a reasonable indication of the subject matter…” The preceding is an extract from which statute?
- Real Estate Services Act
- Statute of Frauds
- Land Title Act
- Law and Equity Act
Option (4) is correct because this extract is taken from section 59(3)(a) of the Law and Equity Act. Therefore, Options (1), (2), and (3) are incorrect. [Chapter 11]
In which of the following circumstances will an agent NOT be personally liable for their actions?
- The agent, identified as such, is mistakenly believed by a third party to be contracting as a principal.
- The agent has no authority to act as an agent.
- The agent commits a tort.
- The agent fails to disclose that they are an agent.
Option (1) is correct because an agent is not personally liable if they are mistakenly believed by a third party to be contracting as a principal.
Options (2), (3), and (4) are incorrect because these are the three situations at common law in which an agent is personally liable to a third party. [Chapter 12]
Under the Canadian Electrical Code, houses of more than 80 m2 must have an electrical service capacity of not less than which of the following options?
- 100 amps
- 125 amps
- 150 amps
- There is no minimum requirement of electrical service capacity; it is up to the discretion of the builder
Option (1) is correct; the Canadian Electrical Code requires minimum electrical service capacity of 100 amps for houses at least 80 square meters. Most houses of this size will have greater electrical service capacity of 125, 150, or 200 amps.
Options (2), (3), and (4) are therefore incorrect. [Chapter 20]
Jake has owned an industrial toxic waste disposal plant in Vancouver for a number of years. The area in which the plant is located was rezoned one year ago and the applicable zoning bylaws do not permit a waste disposal land use. The residents of Vancouver are lobbying the city council to close down the plant.
Which of the following statements is TRUE?
- The plant is a legal non-conforming use of the land that may continue indefinitely.
- The plant is a legal non-conforming use of the land that may continue until Jake sells the property.
- The Planning Act establishes the circumstances under which non-conforming uses may continue.
- If Jake wants to sell the plant, most buyers will require him to take steps to make the use a legal one by obtaining a bylaw amendment called a land use contract for the site.
Option (1) is correct because the plant was conforming to the bylaw prior to the rezoning, and so it will be “grandfathered” as a legal non-conforming use.
Option (2) is incorrect because a non-conforming use may continue through successive changes of ownership.
Option (3) is incorrect because the Local Government Act, not the Planning Act, establishes the circumstances under which non-conforming uses may continue.
Option (4) is incorrect because land use contracts can no longer be created; rather, the use could continue as a legal non-conforming use or the property owner could apply to have the area rezoned. [Chapter 18]
RE/LAX Realty Inc. has ended the current year with a net income of $234,000. During the year, RE/LAX issued $14,000 in dividends, incurred $112,000 of operating expenses, and paid $15,000 in taxes. Which of the following MOST likely occurred on RE/LAX’s balance sheet?
- Owners’ equity increased by $234,000.
- Revenue decreased by $14,000.
- Net income increased by $234,000.
- Retained earnings increased by $220,000.
Option (4) is correct because changes to retained earnings are calculated by taking the amount of net income less any dividends paid to shareholders. RE/LAX earned a net income of $234,000 and paid $14,000 in dividends; therefore, the retained earnings account on their balance sheet should increase by $220,000.
Option (1) is therefore incorrect.
Options (2) and (3) are also incorrect because net income and revenue comes from the income statement rather than the balance sheet. [Chapter 8]
There are many reasons why a property might sell for a price that is different from its current appraised value. Which of the following could be a reason?
- The property is in a state of long-term disrepair.
- The property is located beside a fertilizer plant.
- The appraisal was done by the cost approach.
- The property is located next to a school.
Option (3) is the correct answer as the cost approach is most likely to result in an appraisal value that is significantly different from the price a property might sell for. The reason for this is because the replacement cost of a property may not be representative of the value in the market.
Options (1), (2), and (4) are incorrect because these factors would likely be accounted for in the appraised value. [Chapter 22]
An acquaintance of yours is about to purchase an income-producing property and asks your opinion of the property value. You wisely recommend that she have an appraisal done, but she counters by saying: “since appraisers in British Columbia are not required to be licensed, it must be a straight-forward process that could be done by anyone. Why should I pay someone for an appraisal?”
Which of the following is NOT a reason for hiring a professional appraiser?
- Income-producing properties have low turnover rates.
- The heterogeneity of property means that knowledge concerning one property cannot necessarily be applied to another property.
- Real property markets are local.
- Real property is short-lived; it is easy to account for changes over time.
Option (4) is correct because it is the only option listed that is not a valid reason to hire a professional appraiser. Real property typically has relatively long physical and economic lifespans, and it is not very easy to account for changes over these long time frames.
Options (1), (2), and (3) are incorrect because they are all reasons to hire a professional appraiser. [Chapter 21]
Which of the following statements regarding the income approach of appraisal is TRUE?
- Net operating income is a measure of return on the equity portion of a property’s value.
- Items specific to an owner or investor are included in the calculation of net operating income.
- Net operating income does not consider depreciation, income tax, or debt service.
- The income approach is only used for apartment buildings.
Option (3) is correct because it is true. Option (1) is incorrect because the net operating income represents a return on the entire value of the property; it is not a return only on the equity portion of the property’s value.
Option (2) is incorrect because items specific to an owner or investor are NOT included in the calculation of net operating income.
Option (4) is incorrect because the income approach can be used in appraising most types of property, although it is more appropriate for properties that produce rental income, e.g., apartment buildings, office buildings, industrial space. [Chapter 23]
The flow of information concerning real property is limited and difficult to collect because:
- the turnover rate for real property is high.
- every parcel of real property is homogeneous.
- real property is short-lived and quick to respond to market pressures.
- real property markets are local, with real estate fixed in location.
Option (4) is correct because it is true.
Option (1) is incorrect because the turnover rate for real property is low, meaning there are limited data sources and information available upon which to base an opinion of an value.
Option (2) is incorrect because every parcel of real property is distinct, unique, and heterogenous, meaning property values cannot be easily standardized or generalized.
Option (3) is incorrect because real property is durable and long-lasting, meaning it may not be quick to respond to market pressures. [Chapter 21]
A tenancy agreement, as statutorily defined:
- entitles a landlord to exercise the right to distrain a tenant’s goods for arrears of rent.
- requires a tenant to carry out all repairs and maintenance of the leased premises.
- must always be registered in the Land Title Office to secure a tenant’s rights against subsequent owners of the leased premises.
- will be terminated if a residential tenant abandons the rental unit.
Option (4) is correct because section 44 of the Residential Tenancy Act states that a tenant vacating or abandoning the rental unit will result in the end of a tenancy agreement.
Option (1) is incorrect because a residential landlord cannot distrain a tenant’s goods for arrears of rent.
Option (2) is incorrect because section 32 of the Residential Tenancy Act imposes an obligation on the landlord to repair all types of residential premises.
Option (3) is incorrect because there is no obligation to register a lease of three years or less to secure a tenant’s rights against subsequent owners of the leased premises. [Chapter 6]
Which of the following is NOT subject to the provisions of the Residential Tenancy Act?
- A residential condominium rented out by the offshore owner
- An apartment attached to a warehouse rented under a separate lease
- A basement suite in a private residence
- A house leased for a 29-year term
Option (4) is correct because leases dealing with residential property for a period of over 20 years are not “residential tenancies” and must be dealt with as commercial tenancies. Commercial tenancies are not subject to the provisions of the Residential Tenancy Act.
Options (1), (2), and (3) are incorrect because they are all situations that are subject to the provision of the Residential Tenancy Act. [Chapter 6]
On January 1, Abdul placed an advertisement on CQXR radio station offering squash lessons for $30 per hour. Lois heard the ad and phoned Abdul on January 3 and said “I want to take squash lessons but I’m a student, do you give a lower rate to students?” Abdul said that he only had one rate of $30 per hour. Lois said she would phone back. On January 5, Lois phoned Abdul and said she accepted Abdul’s offer. Which of the following statements concerning Abdul and Lois is true?
- The January 1 advertisement was an offer, which Lois accepted on January 5.
- The January 1 advertisement was an offer and Lois’ telephone call on January 3 was a counter-offer.
- Lois’ January 3 call was a request for information and Abdul’s response on January 3 was an offer.
- Lois’ January 3 call was a counter-offer and Abdul’s response on January 3 was a second counter-offer.
Option (3) is correct because, in the context of Lois’ inquiry regarding the possibility of a lower rate, Abdul statement that his rate was $30 per hour was an offer. This was a valid offer because it contained the necessary terms for a contract to be entered into; in this case, price ($30 per hour) and subject matter (squash lessons).
Option (1) is incorrect because the advertisement was most likely an invitation to treat, used by Abdul to induce radio listeners to pursue a contract for tennis lessons with him.
Option (2) is incorrect for the same reason, and for the reason that Lois’ call was merely an inquiry regarding the possibility of a lower rate for students. Lois did not propose a new rate, therefore, he did not make a counter-offer. Option (4) is incorrect for the same reason. [Chapter 10]
In residential building construction, the term “truss” refers to which of the following options?
- Roof extensions used to provide extra floor area and windows for the upper level
- The structural member, usually wood, placed at the top of window openings
- A prefabricated frame component supporting the roof
- Part of a septic tank water disposal field
Option (3) is correct because a truss is a prefabricated frame component that supports the roof.
Option (1) refers to a dormer, Option (2) refers to a header, and Option (4) refers to one of the many components of a septic tank. [Chapter 20]
(i) is a document evidencing a debt owed by the mortgagor to the mortgagee, which carries with it the (ii) equitable right to redeem the property on payment of the debt, even after default.
- (i) A mortgage; (ii) mortgagee’s
- (i) An agreement for sale; (ii) buyer’s
- (i) A mortgage; (ii) mortgagor’s
- (i) A deposit of the duplicate certificate of title; (ii) borrower’s
Option (3) is correct because a mortgage is a document evidencing a debt, which carries with the mortgagor’s (or borrower’s) equitable right to redeem the property on payment of the debt. Options (1), (2), and (4) are therefore incorrect. [Chapter 15]
Adel is a trading services licensee acting for a developer who is purchasing large blocks of land in Vancouver for a large development. Adel purchases some lots in the area for himself and discloses his identity to the sellers as required by the Real Estate Services Act on those purchases. He does not mention the purchases to his principal, the developer. Shortly thereafter, Adel makes a profit on the resale of his lots due to the effects of his principal’s development on the real estate market. What is this an example of?
- A good business deal that is perfectly acceptable at law
- A use of information that will always, even with disclosure to the principal, be prohibited
- A profit for which Adel must account to his principal
- Adel’s activities are examples of both (2) and (3)
Option (3) is correct because there is a duty on the real estate licensee to tell his or her client everything relevant to the transaction within the agent’s knowledge. In this case, because the licensee has a personal interest in the transaction, he must disclose it to the client, but the transaction is not automatically prohibited.
Options (1), (2), and (4) are therefore incorrect. [Chapter 12]
Which of the following is NOT a power or duty of the British Columbia Financial Services Authority?
- Issuance of real estate services licences
- Conduct formal disciplinary processes
- Require the licensees to pay part or all of the expenses incurred in relation to an investigation to which an order relates
- Undertaking and carrying out real estate law reform
Option (4) is correct because the undertaking and carrying out of real estate law reform is a purpose of the Real Estate Foundation, not the British Columbia Financial Services Authority (BCFSA).
Option (1) is incorrect because the Real Estate Services Act (“RESA”) states that BCFSA is responsible for issuing real estate licences.
Option (2) is incorrect because BCFSA may conduct investigations and hold formal disciplinary processes.
Option (3) is incorrect because according to section 44 of RESA, BCFSA may require the licensee to pay the expenses, or part of the expenses, incurred in relation to either or both of the investigation and the discipline hearing to which the order relates. [Chapter 2]
Which of the following most correctly completes the phrase: “A mortgage is …?
- a contract, evidence of a loan, and required to be registered to be effective between the parties.
- a contract, evidence of a loan, and security for a loan.
- a contract, and a loan.
- a contract, evidence of a loan, security for a loan, and required to be registered to be effective between the parties.
Option (2) is correct as it describes a mortgage.
Options (1) and (4) are incorrect because a mortgage does not necessarily need to be registered to be effective between the parties. This principle is embodied in section 20(1) of the Land Title Act.
Option (3) is incorrect because a mortgage is not a loan. It is an interest in land created by contract as security for a loan made by a lender to the borrower. [Chapter 15]
Which of the following will NOT serve to discharge a contract?
- An agreement between the parties
- The concept of frustration
- Performance of the parties’ mutual obligations
- A patent defect
Option (4) is correct because a patent defect will not discharge a contract as the principle of “caveat emptor” (let the buyer beware) applies, and so the purchaser must take the risk of these patent defects.
Option (1) is incorrect because a contract can be discharged by an agreement between the parties to waive full compliance with the terms of the contract.
Option (2) is incorrect because a contract can be discharged by frustration.
Option (3) is incorrect because once the final act of performance occurs, the contract is discharged. [Chapter 10]
In which of the following scenarios would the City of Vancouver’s Empty Homes Tax MOST likely apply?
- The owner spends the summer (from June to August) living in the property as a principal residence. For the remainder of the year, she lists the property on Airbnb, exclusively for weekend trips. She does not have a hotel or B&B licence.
- The owner lives abroad, but he rents the property for six 30-day terms throughout the year in order to avoid paying the Empty Homes Tax.
- The owner uses the property as a principal residence, but spends up to six months of the year abroad on business trips.
- The owners initially purchased the property as an investment, but now that their daughter has started attending university in Vancouver, she uses the property as a principal residence from September to April of the same year.
Option (1) is correct because the owner would have to live in the property as a principal residence for 6 months in order to avoid the Empty Homes Tax; 3 months is not sufficient. In addition, investors who use their property as a short term rental without a hotel or B&B license are subject to the EHT where the rental periods are shorter than 30 days.
Option (2) is incorrect because properties which are rented for at least 30 days in a row for a minimum of six months in aggregate over the course of a year are exempt from the EHT.
Options (3) and (4) are incorrect because the EHT does not apply to properties being used as a principal residence by the owner, a family member, or a friend for at least six months of the year. [Chapter 19]
What is the purpose of restating many of the common law fiduciary duties owed by a licensee to a client in the Real Estate Services Rules?
- In the case of a breach of fiduciary duty, the client will be able to receive twice the amount of damages.
- It allows a client to also bring action against the licensee for a breach of the Rules.
- A breach of a fiduciary duty may also result in disciplinary proceedings by the British Columbia Financial Services Authority.
- It tends to be easier to prove a violation of the Rules, allowing judges to rule in favour of the client more often with the Rules than with the common law fiduciary duties.
Option (3) is correct because the Real Estate Services Rules (the “Rules”) restate these duties so that the British Columbia Financial Services Authority can initiate disciplinary proceedings against the licensee independently of any common law action that a client may bring against the licensee.
Option (1) is incorrect because the client will not be able to receive additional damages under the Rules.
Option (2) is incorrect because a client can only bring action against a licensee for breaching his or her common law duties, not for a breach of the Rules.
Option (4) is incorrect because when the Rules simply restate a common law fiduciary duty, it will not be easier (or more difficult) to prove a breach of either. [Chapter 12]
A licensee is representing a client who is not wanting to put their name on any document that would connect them with the property. In addition, the client is continually over-justifying and over-explaining the purchase. Which of the following with respect to this transaction is TRUE?
- These facts would result in errors in the draft of an agreement.
- These facts are known as ML/TF indicators.
- These facts would indicate a business relationship.
- These facts would raise a simple suspicion.
Option (2) is correct because these facts are ML/TF indicators, or potential red flags that money laundering is being attempted.
Option (1) is incorrect because there is no indication that an error is being made.
Option (3) is incorrect because while the client may be in a business relationship, their attempted use of another party in the transaction is best described as an ML/TF indicator.
Option (4) is incorrect because a simple suspicion is a “hunch” or intuition without much more, whereas in this case, the licensee could identify multiple ML/TF indicators, which would likely raise a reasonable suspicion. [Chapter 5]
“A contract respecting land or a disposition of land is not enforceable unless there is, in writing signed by the party to be charged or by his agent, both an indication that it has been made and a reasonable indication of the subject matter…” The preceding is an extract from which statute?
- Real Estate Services Act
- Statute of Frauds
- Land Title Act
- Law and Equity Act
Option (4) is correct because this extract is taken from section 59(3)(a) of the Law and Equity Act.
Therefore, Options (1), (2), and (3) are incorrect. [Chapter 11]