Test 1 Flashcards

1
Q

List the various sources US receives it laws from?

A

Constitutions, Statutes & Treaties, Administrative Laws & Executive Orders, and Court Decisions/Legal Precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does the Constitution shape laws? 4 pts

A

(1) Set forth the fundamental powers of government and

(2) identify individual rights.

(3) Is supreme over other forms of law.

(4) Under principles of judicial review, the U.S. Supreme has the ultimate authority to
interpret the U.S. Constitution. The highest courts in each state have the ultimate
authority to interpret state constitutions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do Statutes shape laws?

A

“Written law passed by a legislative body.”

Legislative power to enact statutes cannot exceed the authority granted by the
U.S. and state constitutions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do Administrative Regulations shape laws?

A

Administrative regulations are promulgated to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy but their power cannot exceed what is granted under a federal or state statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do Executive Orders shape laws?

A

It’s an executive delcaration by the president or a governor which has the force of law, usually based on existing statutory powers but this power to issue an
executive order must derive directly from the Constitution or a legislative delegation of power from Congress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Legal Hierarchy

A

Constitutions –> Statutes & Treaties –> Administrative Laws & Executive Orders –> Court Decisions/Legal Precedent (Sometimes court decisions can change Constitutional interpretations which is above Constitution on hierarchy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where does most criminal law come from?

A

Statues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is most criminal law based on federal or state law?

A

Mostly state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is criminal law viewed? 3 points

A

Referred to as “public law”

Punishment for wrongdoing against society

Prosecution by the state (as opposed to private individuals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is civil law often referred to as?

A

“private law”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does civil law mostly deal with?

A

Primarily involves resolution of disputes between private parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where do most civil laws come from?

A

State

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List 4 types of civil law

A

Tort Law, Contract Law, Property Law, and Family Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s tort law? 4 pts

A
  • “a civil wrong.”
  • Usually involves injury to
    person or property.
  • Involves various mental
    states.
  • Overlaps with criminal
    law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are Statutory Rights in Civil Law?

A

Private Right of Action: “When a private person (as opposed to the state) is legally
entitled to enforce rights established under a statute.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What’s common law?

A

Precedent-setting court decisions issued by judges.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What’s Precedent?

A

A court decision that serves as authority for deciding a similar
question of law in a later case with similar facts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what’s Stare Decisis

A

“let the decision stand” – synonymous with precedent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What’s Matter of first impression?

A

A legal issue decided by a precedent-setting court
for the first time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are attributes of U.S. Common Law? 3 points

A

In the U.S. legal system, a considerable portion of law has been developed by
judges through court rulings, rather than through written statutes, regulations,
etc.

Courts interpret and apply other sources of law when deciding cases. These
interpretations of statutes, regulations, etc. become binding precedent for other
courts follow.

Legislative bodies can displace these court rulings by amending statutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What’s the Basic Court Structure?

A

Supreme Courts, Appeals Courts, and Trial Courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are 4 attributes of the Supreme Court?

A
  • Courts of Last Resort
  • Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Discretionary Jurisdiction
  • Review the Law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What’s the Appeals Courts? 4 points

A
  • Intermediate Courts
  • Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Appeal as a Matter of Right
  • Review the Law
24
Q

What’s the Trial Courts?

A
  • Courts of First Instance
  • Original Jurisdiction
  • Review both Facts and Law
25
Q

What qualifications must cases have to go to Federal court?

A

A case must be considered justiciable, which means that it satisfies the following conditions:

Involves a real case and controversy.

and

Plaintiff has standing.

and

Case is ripe and not moot.

26
Q

Define the Terms for Justiciability 4 points

A
  1. Case and Controversy: Must involve a real dispute between/among parties.
    * No advisory opinions.
  2. Standing: Plaintiff must have suffered a ”particularized harm.”
    * Harm must be existing or imminent to the plaintiff.
  3. Ripeness: Case is not ripe if it is contingent upon future events that are too
    speculative.
  4. Mootness: Legal ruling will have no impact on the plaintiff.
27
Q

What’s needed for subject matter jurisdiction?

A

The United States/federal government is a party to the case

or

The case involves a matter of federal law

or

There is diversity of citizenship

28
Q

Can a U.S. District Court Decide the Case? EX: Patricia sues her company Dumb Enterprises for employment discrimination.
She files a private right of action in federal court under both federal and state laws that bar
discrimination. Dumb Enterprises is incorporated in California and Patricia resides in
California.

A

Both – can litigate both federal and state claims in federal court (Ancillary jurisdiction)

29
Q

Can a U.S. District Court Decide the Case? EX: Dumb Enterprises has fired all its women employees in violation of federal
employment law. Petice gets fired and tells her friend Phillip, who has never worked for the
company. Phillip gets mad and sues Dumb Enterprises in federal court.

A

No standing to sue from Phillip. No harm to Phillip our girl Petice has to step up

30
Q

Can a U.S. District Court Decide the Case? EX: Paige will open a construction company soon in Alabama and will hire contractors to work for her. She wants to know if certain provisions of her proposed
contracts are legal under Alabama law. She files an action to ask the federal courts.

A

Not justiciable; asking for an advisory opinion

31
Q

Can a U.S. District Court Decide the Case? EX: Priscilla wants people to pay their student loans. She has never been in student
loan debt and has no loan obligations, but she hates that Biden will forgive loans for some
borrowers. She files a lawsuit against Biden in federal court claiming his actions to be illegal.

A

like the climate change ex, she has no standing but just doesn’t like the policy

32
Q

Can a U.S. District Court Decide the Case? EX: Sarah’s state has instituted an almost total ban on abortion. She wants to
terminate her pregnancy and seeks to challenge the law in court under the U.S.
Constitution. Prior to the federal courts hearing her case, she gave birth to the baby.

A

Likely mooting but exceptions are made bc she prego for 9 months and cases take a lot longer to reach upper courts :/

33
Q

Can a U.S. District Court Decide the Case? EX: Paul is a resident of New York and claims that Devon breached a contract with
him in violation of New York state law. Devon is a resident of Tennessee.

A

Devon can go to the court in NY and ask to bring it to the Federal court if it 75k>

34
Q

What is a Circuit Split?

A

A circuit split occurs when two or
more U.S. Circuit Courts decide similar
cases in contradictory ways (i.e.
conflicting rulings).

  • If the Supreme Court does not resolve
    a circuit split, U.S. District Courts are
    bound to follow precedent in their
    own Circuit.
35
Q

What are the Roles of Federal Courts?

A

U.S. Districts Courts: Determine Law and Facts
U.S. Circuit Courts: Legal Correction
U.S. Supreme Court: Legal Correction; Unify National Law and Policy

36
Q

What are Litigants in the Courts?

A

U.S. Districts Courts: Plaintiff v. Defendant
U.S. Circuit Courts: Appellant v. Appellee
U.S. Supreme Court: Petitioner v. Respondent

37
Q

What is Court Curbing?

A

“Legislative efforts to restrict, remove, or otherwise limit court power”

38
Q

What is legitimacy?

A

The belief that a rule, institution, or leader has the right to govern.

39
Q

How did courts gain the power of judicial review?

A

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

40
Q

Marbury v. Madison simplified timeline of events

A

Federalist John Marshall becomes Chief Justice of Supreme Court.

Congress Passes the Judiciary Act of 1801, adding 16 new Circuit judges and decreasing Supreme Court to 5. President Adams begins to fill positions with Federalist judges.

Democrat-Republican Thomas Jefferson wins Presidency in House Election.

Congress passes DC Organic Act. Allowed Adams to appoint Justices of the Peace for the District of Columbia. Adams nominates judges.

After Congress approves, Adams signs commissions for Marbury and others.

Jefferson inaugurated as President. He refuses to deliver Commissions.

41
Q

Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court ruling (3 pts)

A
  1. Courts have the power of judicial review and can strike down congressional statutes
  2. The portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which grants original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court to issue writs of mandamus violates the Constitution. It is struck down.
  3. The Court thus has no power to mandate that Marbury’s commission be delivered
42
Q

Marbury v. Madison - who won?

A
  • technically, the Court ruled that Marbury had the right to the commission, but that the Court couldn’t command it be delivered
  • Madison won because Marbury did not receive his commission
  • the Court won in spirit because it gave itself the power of judicial review
43
Q

can the courts bring about significant social reform?

A

it depends on your view, Gerald Rosenberg is skeptical

44
Q

dynamic court view

A
  • federal courts are free from electoral constraints to act independently
  • judicial independence creates respect for courts as a neutral arbitrator
  • courts can “point the way” to change by dramatizing issues
  • threats of lawsuits can alter behavior
45
Q

constrained court view

A
  • limited nature of constitutional rights
  • principles of justiciability limit access to the courts
  • judges are not truly independent; they don’t stray far from public opinion
  • judicial decisions are not self-enforcing (“least dangerous branch”)
46
Q

judicial enforcement mechanisms

A

lateral enforcement and vertical enforcement

47
Q

lateral enforcement

A
  • courts rely upon other actors to enforce their decisions
  • ex: Brown v. Board
48
Q

vertical enforcement

A
  • courts have their own enforcement mechanisms
  • ex: Roe v. Wade
49
Q

What’s the legitimacy argument for the courts?

A

Because courts lack the power of the purse and sword and have weak enforcement powers, they heavily rely upon legitimacy to ensure obedience

50
Q

diffuse support

A
  • the generalized level of public support for the courts as institutions
  • ex: I respect the courts and support their power of judicial review
  • lower levels of diffuse support = lower levels of perceived legitimacy
51
Q

specific support

A
  • the level of support for individual court decisions
  • ex: I agree with the court’s decision in Roe v. Wade
  • lower levels of specific support may or may not translate into lower levels of diffuse support
52
Q

does legitimacy rest upon satisfaction with court performance?

A
  • democratic values and fundamental support for democratic institutions serves as the best predictors of diffuse support
  • the effect of specific support upon diffuse support is often short-lived (ex: Bush v. Gore)
  • changes in diffuse support may be gradual or incremental
  • some groups, such as African-Americans, exhibit lower levels of diffuse support
53
Q

does legitimacy reflect the polarization in society?

A
  • historically, support for the Supreme Court has not differed much along partisan lines
  • when surveyed, both Ds and Rs support core democratic values that underlie the courts
  • the Court didn’t used to be as polarized as it is today (used to be more moderates)
54
Q

does legitimacy rest upon the so-called “legal myth”?

A
  • “to know the courts is to love them” -> people with greater knowledge of courts tend to exhibit more diffuse support
  • people who “know” the courts can appreciate that judges have discretion and that ideology has influence, but they expect judges to engage in “principled decision making” that respects the law
  • symbols of law and justice can reinforce supremacy
55
Q

can judicial decisions change public opinion?

A
  • research has produced mixed findings as to the ability of the courts to alter public opinion
  • some studies show no effect or a backlash effect
  • other studies and experiments suggest that SCOTUS opinions can legitimize and build acceptance for policy decisions, at least in certain contexts (ex: marriage equality)
  • the effect of court rulings upon public opinion may be conditioned upon the nature and level of media coverage and the extent to which members of the public listen to media
56
Q

List all SCOTUS justices

A

Neil Gorsuch, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, John Roberts (CHIEF), Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas

57
Q

What’s Case and Controversy?

A

Must involve a real dispute between/among parties.* No advisory opinions.