Terrorism legislations Flashcards

1
Q

Public perceptions

A

The public is increasingly willing to give up its civil liberties in the name of counter-terrorism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The nature of threat has evolved

A

The threat posed by violent extremists has ‘evolved’ and is no longer a problem solely stemming from countries like Iraq and Afghanistan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Human Rights Act 1998

• Power to judges

A

The HRA gives judges the power to declare legislation to be ‘incompatible’, which forces politicians to either revise or ‘derogate’ laws; especially when legislation cannot be reconciled with the ECHR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the aim of the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures 2011

A

Aimed to allow the authorities to force suspects to move to another part of the country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Human Rights Act 1998

• Example of derogation

A

the UK is derogated from Article 5 of the ECHR during 2001-2005 in order to pass ‘tougher’ anti-terrorism legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Human Rights Act 1998

• Judges in protecting civil liberties

A

The HRA substantially widened the capacity of judiciary to protect civil liberties and check the exercise of executive power and legislative power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Human Rights Act 1998

• Declaration of incompatibility

A

Since the Human Rights Act came into force in 2000, UK courts have made 29 declarations of incompatibility, of which 20 have become final.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What’s wrong with the HRA

• Sovereignty

A

Sovereignty lies in Parliament and it has supreme legislative power. This means that parliament has the absolute and unlimited legal authority, as they have the ability to make, amend or repeal any law it wishes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Problems stemming from the HRA in relation to terrorism

A

The government failed to hold the nine terrorist suspects who were held in Belmarsh Prison after the Law Lords ruled that their the human rights of were being abused and should be released in December 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the key elements of the Counter-Terrorism 2008?

A

1) Enables post-charge questioning of terrorist suspects
2) Amends the definition of terrorism by inserting a racial cause
3) A constable can take fingerprints and DNA samples from individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why was the Counter-Terrorism 2008 introduced?

A

To gather and share information for counter-terrorism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the disadvantage of the Counter-Terrorism 2008?

A

Amnesty International was concerned that the power included no effective safeguards against arbitrary detention
* It could lead to other abusive detention practices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Failure of the Counter-Terrorism 2008

• Cross-party consensus

A

Failed to achieve cross-party consensus on a range of proposals, especially over pre-charge detention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Failure of the Counter-Terrorism 2008

• Labour vote

A

Only a third of Labour MPs backed extending pre-charge detention beyond 28 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was in TPIM 2011

A

It abolishes control orders through the repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What can the state do under TPIMs 2011

A

Impose specified terrorism prevention and investigation measures on an individual where there is reasonable belief that individual is or has been involved in terrorism-related activity. For example, tagging and tougher powers to stop people going abroad to fight.

17
Q

What did the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 introduce?

• Control orders

A

introduced control orders, allowing the government to restrict the activities of individuals if suspects of ‘involvement in terrorist-related activity.

18
Q

How does control order erode civil liberties?

• Innocence

A

The restrictions imposed by control orders are undermining the presumption of innocence, which is a vital part of the UDHR.

19
Q

How does control order erode civil liberties?

• Proof

A

control orders under this terrorism legislation require a lower standard of proof and proceedings can be held in closed session