Terms of a Contract Flashcards
Importance of the term
Bannerman v White
Timing
Routledge v McKay
Reduction of contract into writing
Routledge v McKay
Exclusion of oral statement in written contract is not decisive in itself, consider other factors
Birch v Paramount
Special skill or knowledge
Oscar Chess v Williams
Dick Bentley v Harold Smith
Checks - vendor discouraged further checks - term
Schawel v Reade
Checks - vendor encouraged further checks - representation
Ecay v Godfrey
Parole Evidence Rule
extrinsic evidence, oral or otherwise, may not be adduced which seeks to add, vary or contradict terms of a written contract
Jacobs v Batavia
Circumvention of parole evidence rule - part written part oral contract
J Evans v Andrea Merzario
Circumvention of parole evidence rule - collateral contracts
Helibut Symons v Buckleton
A collateral contract may be found even where it contradicts the main contract
City & Westminster Properties v Mudd
Collateral contract may be with a third party
Shanklin Pier v Detel
Where a term is particularly onerous, the party seeking to enforce it must show it was reasonably and fairly brought to the attention of the other
Interfoto v Stiletto
Terms will only be implied where there is a binding contract
Scancarriers
Terms implied in fact - trade customs
British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant
Course of dealing must be consistent
McCutcheon v MacBrayne
Course of dealing must be regular
Hollier v Rambler Motors - 3/4 times over 5 years
Henry Kendall v William Lillico - 3/4 times a month for 3 years
Terms implied in fact - business efficacy
The Moorcock
Shirlaw v Southern Foundaries - officious bystander
Buyer of car discovered it was stolen - breach of s12(1) SGA 1979
Rowland v Divall
s13 - correspondence with description applies to private sales
Beale v Taylor
Hot water bottle burst - not fit for purpose
Priest v Last
Woollen underpants caused dermatitis - not fit for purpose
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills
Product must continue to be fit/stay in reasonable condition for a reasonable time after delivery
Lambert v Lewis
Product must be suitable for specific purpose made known, unless unreasonable to rely on skill and judgement of seller
Balmoral group v Borealis